Bracketology 2016-17 Style

Started by Jim Hyla, December 22, 2016, 06:54:56 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

David Harding

This is as good a place as any to call attention to this recent study of the effect of jet lag on baseball players.  The Chicago Tribune reports on a Northwestern University press release regarding a study published in the   Procedings of the National Academy of Science.  (abstract)
Quote from: Article abstractLaboratory studies have demonstrated that circadian clocks align physiology and behavior to 24-h environmental cycles. Examination of athletic performance has been used to discern the functions of these clocks in humans outside of controlled settings. Here, we examined the effects of jet lag, that is, travel that shifts the alignment of 24-h environmental cycles relative to the endogenous circadian clock, on specific performance metrics in Major League Baseball. Accounting for potential differences in home and away performance, travel direction, and team confounding variables, we observed that jet-lag effects were largely evident after eastward travel with very limited effects after westward travel, consistent with the >24-h period length of the human circadian clock. Surprisingly, we found that jet lag impaired major parameters of home-team offensive performance, for example, slugging percentage, but did not similarly affect away-team offensive performance. On the other hand, jet lag impacted both home and away defensive performance. Remarkably, the vast majority of these effects for both home and away teams could be explained by a single measure, home runs allowed. Rather than uniform effects, these results reveal surprisingly specific effects of circadian misalignment on athletic performance under natural conditions.
I don't have the energy to do thorough review, but my gut reaction is that they have looked at enough different measures that you might expect statistical fluctuations to push a few of the measures into the range they have declared to be statistically significant.

marty

Quote from: marty
Quote from: upprdeckthats an issue for the bracket at large but this is a conversation about where cornell will go. the top 4 seeds have different bracket integrity rules than the other seeds

Cornell is not a host. If we land 3 or 4 behind two other eastern teams we could be on a plane traveling west! This is all a wonderful dream.

Last night the Deerticks lost to ASU which will hurt the ECAC. OTOH Princeton shocked Penn State which should help us if we get back to winning.

And to further Adam's point, as of this morning Western Michigan as the 4 seed would be traveling east for the regionals.
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

CU2007

I have a feeling we'll be watching championship weekends praying that a team in the top 14 of PWR wins the Hockey East, Big 10 and NCHC tourneys

ugarte

Quote from: CU2007I have a feeling we'll be watching championship weekends praying that a team in the top 14 of PWR wins the Hockey East, Big 10 and NCHC tourneys
Oh cool, an optimist.

Jim Hyla

Okay here it is. Obviously we're out.


This week's brackets

[b][u]East Regional (Providence):[/u][/b]
16 Canisius vs. 2 Denver
11 Providence vs. [b][u]6 Union[/u][/b]

[b][u]Northeast Regional (Manchester):[/u][/b]
14 Wisconsin vs. 3 Boston University
10 Boston College vs. [b][u]8 Harvard[/u][/b]

[b][u]Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):[/u][/b]
13 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 4 Western Michigan
12 Vermont vs. 5 Penn State

[b][u]West Regional (Fargo):[/u][/b]
15 Bemidji State vs. 1 Minnesota-Duluth
9 North Dakota vs. 7 Minnesota

[b][u]Conference breakdowns[/u][/b]

Hockey East — 5
NCHC — 4
Big Ten — 3
[b][u]ECAC Hockey — 2[/u][/b]
WCHA — 1
Atlantic Hockey – 1
Movement

In: Wisconsin, Providence
Out: Ohio State, [b][u]Cornell[/u][/b]

Read more: http://www.uscho.com/bracketology/2017/02/01/start-of-february-sees-more-tweaks-to-pairwise-rankings/#ixzz4XSpN4hq0

If it were to stay like this, Manchester would be fun to watch.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

marty

Quote from: marty
Quote from: marty
Quote from: upprdeckthats an issue for the bracket at large but this is a conversation about where cornell will go. the top 4 seeds have different bracket integrity rules than the other seeds

Cornell is not a host. If we land 3 or 4 behind two other eastern teams we could be on a plane traveling west! This is all a wonderful dream.

Last night the Deerticks lost to ASU which will hurt the ECAC. OTOH Princeton shocked Penn State which should help us if we get back to winning.

And to further Adam's point, as of this morning Western Michigan as the 4 seed would be traveling east for the regionals.

I was wrong and Denver might be pissed if the season ended today but here is why Adam is right:

Quote from: BracketsThis week's brackets

East Regional (Providence):
16 Canisius vs. 2 Denver
11 Providence vs. 6 Union

Northeast Regional (Manchester):
14 Wisconsin vs. 3 Boston University
10 Boston College vs. 8 Harvard

Midwest Regional (Cincinnati):
13 Massachusetts-Lowell vs. 4 Western Michigan
12 Vermont vs. 5 Penn State

West Regional (Fargo):
15 Bemidji State vs. 1 Minnesota-Duluth
9 North Dakota vs. 7 Minnesota
[\\QUOTE]
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

CU2007

Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: CU2007I have a feeling we'll be watching championship weekends praying that a team in the top 14 of PWR wins the Hockey East, Big 10 and NCHC tourneys
Oh cool, an optimist.

Well given our current position, it wouldn't matter. So yes, you could easily argue that it is optimistic.

Trotsky

Quote from: CU2007I have a feeling we'll be watching championship weekends praying that a team in the top 14 of PWR wins the Hockey East, Big 10 and NCHC tourneys
We'll see.  We're not in a deep hole and I firmly believe we will make it to Lake Placid where anything can happen.  The question is are they the guys who took care of an excellent SLU squad or the guys who choked last weekend?  

I really want to believe the former.  The thing is we don't have to guess.  They'll show us.

marty

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: CU2007I have a feeling we'll be watching championship weekends praying that a team in the top 14 of PWR wins the Hockey East, Big 10 and NCHC tourneys
We'll see.  We're not in a deep hole and I firmly believe we will make it to Lake Placid where anything can happen.  The question is are they the guys who took care of an excellent SLU squad or the guys who choked last weekend?  

I really want to believe the former.  The thing is we don't have to guess.  They'll show us.

And the up side is that when they "show us" some of us will be watching division one college hockey. I've always enjoyed watching a good hockey game.  ;-)
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

Jim Hyla

"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

CU2007

Is there any benefit (Pairwise speaking) to finishing fifth in the league and picking up two extra (seemingly easy) wins? I understand the benefit of a bye week and home ice in the quarterfinals, just kind of brain storming.

nshapiro

Is there some reason that the RPIs on the USCHO pairwise page are different from the RPIs on the RPI Page?
When Section D was the place to be

ugarte

Quote from: CU2007Is there any benefit (Pairwise speaking) to finishing fifth in the league and picking up two extra (seemingly easy) wins? I understand the benefit of a bye week and home ice in the quarterfinals, just kind of brain storming.
A FEW TOO MANY ASSUMPTIONS BAKED INTO THIS QUESTION FOR MY HEART!

andyw2100

Quote from: CU2007Is there any benefit (Pairwise speaking) to finishing fifth in the league and picking up two extra (seemingly easy) wins? I understand the benefit of a bye week and home ice in the quarterfinals, just kind of brain storming.

There may be "seemingly easy" wins, but there are no "easy wins."

Also finishing high enough to get the bye, vs finishing in 5th place has improved pairwise results built in. I'll take the bye!

ursusminor

Quote from: CU2007Is there any benefit (Pairwise speaking) to finishing fifth in the league and picking up two extra (seemingly easy) wins? I understand the benefit of a bye week and home ice in the quarterfinals, just kind of brain storming.
Considering how bad the records of RPI and Brown, one of which will likely be 12th, are. I doubt that those wins would be worth much.