ECAC Playoff Possibilities and Race in a Nutshell Thread

[CowbellGuy]

Is the 2013 version available?

Let me make it simple for you: in a nutshell, we do not have a shot at the ECAC title this year.

Your nut's shell has a large hole in it.

[jtn27]

Is the 2013 version available?

Let me make it simple for you: in a nutshell, we do not have a shot at the ECAC title this year.

Your nut's shell has a large hole in it.

If you're saying what I think you're saying, I disagree. Technically, yes, we can still win the ECAC title. But I highly doubt that we can win 6 postseason games, at least one of which will probably have to be against Q.

[Ben]

Is the 2013 version available?

Let me make it simple for you: in a nutshell, we do not have a shot at the ECAC title this year.

Your nut's shell has a large hole in it.

If we win (which we will not), I will do something outrageous. Suggestions welcome.

[CowbellGuy]

Is the 2013 version available?

Let me make it simple for you: in a nutshell, we do not have a shot at the ECAC title this year.

Your nut's shell has a large hole in it.

If you're saying what I think you're saying, I disagree. Technically, yes, we can still win the ECAC title. But I highly doubt that we can win 6 postseason games, at least one of which will probably have to be against Q.

Is it likely? Hell, no. Is it possible? Yes.

[Dafatone]

Is the 2013 version available?

Let me make it simple for you: in a nutshell, we do not have a shot at the ECAC title this year.

Your nut's shell has a large hole in it.

If you're saying what I think you're saying, I disagree. Technically, yes, we can still win the ECAC title. But I highly doubt that we can win 6 postseason games, at least one of which will probably have to be against Q.

Is it likely? Hell, no. Is it possible? Yes.

Call it blind stupid optimism, but I think we'll make a good run.  What does a "good run" entail?  No clue.

[Trotsky]

Is the 2013 version available?

Let me make it simple for you: in a nutshell, we do not have a shot at the ECAC title this year.

Your nut's shell has a large hole in it.

If we win (which we will not), I will do something outrageous. Suggestions welcome.

Dress head to foot in Harvard apparel at the next Fish and Fowl you attend, without indicating in any way it's ironic.

[Trotsky]

BTW, you're fairly safe.  We are now assured of finishing under .500 in the ECAC for the first time in 14 years.  Here are the lowest RS winning percentage teams to ever win the ECAC tourney:

Code Select Expand


[b]Pct Team Year Seed[/b]
.455 Prn 1998 7 / 12
.500 Cor 1980 8 / 17
.500 Hvd 2004 6 / 12
.523 RPI 1995 6 / 12
.523 Hvd 2002 3 / 12
.568 Prv 1981 6 / 17


[BearLover]

I have no doubt in my mind Cornell can beat every team in the conference, except perhaps Q.  They can also lose to each of these teams.  I predict they win until they have to play Q/Yale.

[Jim Hyla]

I have no doubt in my mind Cornell can beat every team in the conference, except perhaps Q.  They can also lose to each of these teams.  I predict they win until they have to play Q/Yale.

That may depend upon which goalie Yale plays.

[jtwcornell91]

Is the 2013 version available?

John and I are in negotiations.

slack.net vanished a few weeks ago, just as I was too happily preoccupied to notice.  The hockey part of the website exists on my laptop; I should release it sometime...

[KeithK]

Is the 2013 version available?

John and I are in negotiations.

slack.net vanished a few weeks ago, just as I was too happily preoccupied to notice.  The hockey part of the website exists on my laptop; I should release it sometime...

Oh I see.  You are holding out, trying to get additional leverage for your negotiations.  Give him whatever he asks!

[Trotsky]

Is the 2013 version available?

John and I are in negotiations.

slack.net vanished a few weeks ago, just as I was too happily preoccupied to notice.  The hockey part of the website exists on my laptop; I should release it sometime...

Oh I see.  You are holding out, trying to get additional leverage for your negotiations.  Give him whatever he asks!

John is being represented by Scott Boras.

[ursusminor]

Is the 2013 version available?

John and I are in negotiations.

slack.net vanished a few weeks ago, just as I was too happily preoccupied to notice.  The hockey part of the website exists on my laptop; I should release it sometime...

Oh I see.  You are holding out, trying to get additional leverage for your negotiations.  Give him whatever he asks!

John is being represented by Scott Boras.

I guessed correctly when I read your post of February 17, 2013 12:57PM. :-D

[Give My Regards]

So, how are those negotiations coming along?  'Cause if we have to go into the last week of the season with Replacement Scripts, I for one will be a little unhappy.

[Trotsky]

So, how are those negotiations coming along?  'Cause if we have to go into the last week of the season with Replacement Scripts, I for one will be a little unhappy.

Every recruit holds out for the perks.