PWR volatile, Cornell -> #8t

[Chris \'03]

Why is it that when you apply a reasonable RPI bonues Union ceases to be a TUC? I can't totally figure that out.

[ben03]

what are the agreed upon bonus weights?

[nyc94]

[Q]Chris '03 Wrote:

 
Why is it that when you apply a reasonable RPI bonues Union ceases to be a TUC? I can't totally figure that out. [/q]

Not quite sure what you mean but Union's loss tonight dropped their RPI below .500 so they are not a TUC.  I don't know if bonus points can raise you to be a TUC or if you have to be one before the bonus is applied.  Either way, without the win over Union in our record against TUCs we lose the comparison with Nebraska-Omaha.  For a few minutes we were winning that one.

[ben03]

With 12 of 22 scores in:
WCHA has #'s 1, 3, 4
HEA has #'s 2, 6, 10
ECACHL has #'s 7, 8, 9
CCHA has # 5

[Al DeFlorio]

[Q]ben03 Wrote:

 With 12 of 22 scores in:
WCHA has #'s 1, 3, 4
HEA has #'s 2, 6, 10
ECACHL has #'s 7, 8, 9
CCHA has # 5[/q]
#3 losing to Michigan Tech 4-2 with 7:30 to go.

[ben03]

EDIT:

With 16 of 22 scores in:

WCHA has #'s 1, 3, 4
HEA has #'s 2, 6t, 10
ECACHL has #'s 6t, 8, 9
CCHA has # 5

[Al DeFlorio]

[Q]Al DeFlorio Wrote:

 [Q2]ben03 Wrote:

 With 12 of 22 scores in:
WCHA has #'s 1, 3, 4
HEA has #'s 2, 6, 10
ECACHL has #'s 7, 8, 9
CCHA has # 5[/Q]
#3 losing to Michigan Tech 4-2 with 7:30 to go.[/q]
Minny gets a PPG but Tech comes right back, 5-3.

Go Jamie Russell.

[ben03]

let's go tech!!!

[holy $hit did i just say that ... ?!? ::screwy::]

[Al DeFlorio]

[Q]ben03 Wrote:

 let's go tech!!![/q]

6-3 with an ENG

[jtwcornell91]

[Q]Chris '03 Wrote:

 
Why is it that when you apply a reasonable RPI bonues Union ceases to be a TUC? I can't totally figure that out. [/q]

I suspect you caught the static page before it had been re-run with the Union result included; when you applied any bonus (even all zeros) you used all the current scores.

[ben03]

[Q]Al DeFlorio Wrote:

 [Q2]ben03 Wrote:

 let's go tech!!![/Q]
6-3 with an ENG[/q]
they haven't posted the score yet ... maybe if they don't put it up, it didn't happen ::nut:: ;-)

[Al DeFlorio]

[Q]ben03 Wrote:

 [Q2]Al DeFlorio Wrote:

 [Q2]ben03 Wrote:

 let's go tech!!![/Q]
6-3 with an ENG[/Q]
they haven't posted the score yet ... maybe if they don't put it up, it didn't happen[/q]

Musta cut the wires outa the Twin Cities. :-P

[jy3]

 Rk Team PWR Record RPI 
Rk W-L-T Win % Rk RPI 
1 Colorado College 28 1 20-3-2 .8400 1 .6247 
2 Boston College 27 2 15-3-3 .7857 4 .5862 
3 Minnesota 26 10 18-8-0 .6923 2 .6136 
4 Denver 24 8 15-6-1 .7045 5 .5807 
5 Michigan 23 4t 18-6-1 .7400 6 .5712 
6t Boston University 22 16t 13-9-1 .5870 3 .5869 
6t Colgate 22 3 18-5-0 .7826 8 .5623 
8 Harvard 21 13 10-5-2 .6471 7 .5638 
9 Cornell 20 7 12-4-2 .7222 10 .5610 
10 New Hampshire 19 6 16-5-2 .7391 12 .5574 
11t Mass.-Lowell 17 11 13-5-3 .6905 11 .5575 
11t Ohio State 17 9 16-6-3 .7000 15 .5468 
13 North Dakota 15 20 14-10-2 .5769 13 .5555 
14t Nebraska-Omaha 14 21 12-9-2 .5652 20 .5190 
14t Wisconsin 14 4t 18-6-1 .7400 9 .5618 
16t Northern Michigan 13 16t 11-7-5 .5870 21 .5157 
16t Michigan State 13 26 13-11-1 .5400 14 .5492 
18t Maine 12 18 12-8-5 .5800 16 .5394 
18t Vermont 12 15 13-8-3 .6042 18 .5270 
20 Dartmouth 10 28 8-8-2 .5000 22 .5133 
21 Northeastern 8 37 8-12-3 .4130 17 .5295 
22 Minnesota State 7 42t 8-13-4 .4000 19 .5252 
23t Bemidji State 5 12 14-7-0 .6667 23 .5115 
23t Brown 5 22 8-6-3 .5588 24 .5113 
25t St. Lawrence 4 25 12-10-1 .5435 25 .5103 
25t Western Michigan 4 30 10-11-1 .4773 26 .5065 
27 Bowling Green 3 23 10-8-3 .5476 27 .5063 
28 Ferris State 1 36 9-13-3 .4200 28 .5063 
29 Massachusetts 0 32 10-12-2 .4583 29 .5017 

in case no one saw
ECACHL 6, 8, 9, 18,20,23,25
onion not a TUC

[KP '06]

Anybody remember over the last few years, how many ECAC teams have usually been TUC's at the end of the season? I want to say 4 or 5 seems more average (though I could wrong). There's plenty of hockey left this season, but we're looking at a potential for 6 or 7. Rock on, ECACHL.

[DeltaOne81]

[Q]KP '06 Wrote:

 Anybody remember over the last few years, how many ECAC teams have usually been TUC's at the end of the season? I want to say 4 or 5 seems more average (though I could wrong). There's plenty of hockey left this season, but we're looking at a potential for 6 or 7. Rock on, ECACHL.[/q]
The number of TUCs is nice. But what really matters is the # of teams in the NCAA tournament. With a definite chance to send 3, and 4 with a tourney upset (or a Vermont charge, which hopefuly won't start tonight), the ECAC could be making a serious impression, with a number of chances to improve ourselves on the national stage.

Anyone want to say when the last time the ECAC had 3 teams in the tourney was? or 4? I can't remember more than 2 since my freshman year (confired, 1 or 2 every year since '00)