Q Game Thread

[George64]

lets get coach back behind the bench as well soon.

And Andreev and Stienburg back on the ice.
.

[Scersk '97]

But I am known (see Elliott, Jason) not to be an astute predictor of goalie development.

Don't feel bad. I liked Davenport over Scrivens. Mistakes happen.

In my defense, Skazyk did backstop us to victory over Harvard early in the '95–'96 season.

That being said, the depths of my error were later completely exposed by Elliott's masterpiece: the 3–0 semifinal win over an absolutely stacked (including Todd White) Clarkson, which was perhaps the most satisfying game of my undergrad years.

[upprdeck]

lets get coach back behind the bench as well soon.

And Andreev and Stienburg back on the ice.
.

anyone know which one is walking around with the arm in a sling this weekend?   with masks on no idea who is who.

[Swampy]

lets get coach back behind the bench as well soon.

And Andreev and Stienburg back on the ice.
.

anyone know which one is walking around with the arm in a sling this weekend?   with masks on no idea who is who.

Let's hope it's Mike Schafer (rather than any on-ice players). ::cry::

[Trotsky]

Fans like outcomes that have a W or L.

Citation needed.

[Trotsky]

That being said, the depths of my error were later completely exposed by Elliott's masterpiece: the 3–0 semifinal win over an absolutely stacked (including Todd White) Clarkson, which was perhaps the most satisfying game of my undergrad years.

This, for me, will always be Elliott's masterpiece.  He was so badly banged up that he could barely move, but he willed himself to survive.  One of the most amazing goaltending performances I've ever seen.

[Scersk '97]

That being said, the depths of my error were later completely exposed by Elliott's masterpiece: the 3–0 semifinal win over an absolutely stacked (including Todd White) Clarkson, which was perhaps the most satisfying game of my undergrad years.

This, for me, will always be Elliott's masterpiece.  He was so badly banged up that he could barely move, but he willed himself to survive.  One of the most amazing goaltending performances I've ever seen.

Certainly a great performance, but it's difficult to separate the road win at RPI from what happened in the PIG afterward, when we barely stood in the way of the first of Princeton's decadal charges. Of course, when your alternative is the wonderfully pugnacious but diminutive Ian Burt, you do what you have to do.

[Trotsky]

when your alternative is the wonderfully pugnacious but diminutive Ian Burt, you do what you have to do.

Was he "We gonna go?"  "Um.  No?  "Wrong."  "Oh.  I guess so then."

And who was that?  Yacey's Mom?

[Weder]

when your alternative is the wonderfully pugnacious but diminutive Ian Burt, you do what you have to do.

Was he "We gonna go?"  "Um.  No?  "Wrong."  "Oh.  I guess so then."

And who was that?  Yacey's Mom?

This was by far the best player quote from that era.

[RichH]

when your alternative is the wonderfully pugnacious but diminutive Ian Burt, you do what you have to do.

Was he "We gonna go?"  "Um.  No?  "Wrong."  "Oh.  I guess so then."

And who was that?  Yacey's Mom?

Leeor Shtrom, I believe.

[Trotsky]

when your alternative is the wonderfully pugnacious but diminutive Ian Burt, you do what you have to do.

Was he "We gonna go?"  "Um.  No?  "Wrong."  "Oh.  I guess so then."

And who was that?  Yacey's Mom?

Leeor Shtrom, I believe.

God, that's right.  Now he's going to be my neighbor.

[Trotsky]

when your alternative is the wonderfully pugnacious but diminutive Ian Burt, you do what you have to do.

Was he "We gonna go?"  "Um.  No?  "Wrong."  "Oh.  I guess so then."

And who was that?  Yacey's Mom?

This was by far the best player quote from that era.

This was the exact wording from Ian's recounting:

"We were just having a conversation, I just asked him how the game was," Burt said. "I asked him why he didn't jump me and he was like, 'Oh, your back was turned.' He was like, 'You want to go with me?' and I [said], 'Not really, you'll probably beat me up.' He said, 'Well, let's go then,' and throws his gloves off."

[Scersk '97]

"We were just having a conversation, I just asked him how the game was," Burt said.

It was 5–2 with less than two minutes to go in the third, and Shtrom had been getting absolutely shelled. Burt's clearly trying to make himself sound very innocent, and how he reports that conversation surely doesn't convey the acidic nature of his seemingly innocent query.

I have always imagined it was more, "So, how's the game going, eh?!" The goalie to goalie equivalent of "scoreboard, scoreboard." Kind of, "So, you've been seeing a lot of pucks tonight, eh? Too bad they keep going in the back of the net."

For a great discussion, see Give My Regard's wonderful hockey-l posting and Beeej's report of the conversation.

[cbuckser]

When Ian Burt told the story the following day, the acid was not lost on the listeners. It was Canadian humour, eh?

"We were just having a conversation, I just asked him how the game was," Burt said.

It was 5–2 with less than two minutes to go in the third, and Shtrom had been getting absolutely shelled. Burt's clearly trying to make himself sound very innocent, and how he reports that conversation surely doesn't convey the acidic nature of his seemingly innocent query.

I have always imagined it was more, "So, how's the game going, eh?!" The goalie to goalie equivalent of "scoreboard, scoreboard." Kind of, "So, you've been seeing a lot of pucks tonight, eh? Too bad they keep going in the back of the net."

For a great discussion, see Give My Regard's wonderful hockey-l posting and Beeej's report of the conversation.

[osorojo]

"Power Rankings" is how fanatical statisticians enjoy following college hockey. It takes a whole lot of intricate computations to explain the bizarre swings in the performance of the Cornell Men's Hockey Team. This year has been very, very good for statisticians, not so hot for coaches.