Scandal at Penn State

Started by scoop85, November 05, 2011, 01:00:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ugarte

Quote from: jtn27
Quote from: ugarteGuilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.

Soon to be joined by Spanier, Curley and Schultz and eternally by the sainted Joe Paterno. What a disgrace.

Unless I counted wrong, you have 3 extra "guilty"s.
It's true. I was just copying and pasting, so... 1, 2, 4, 8, 16+16+16. Close enough. And we'll get three more "guilty"s soon enough.

jtn27

Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: jtn27
Quote from: ugarteGuilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.

Soon to be joined by Spanier, Curley and Schultz and eternally by the sainted Joe Paterno. What a disgrace.

Unless I counted wrong, you have 3 extra "guilty"s.
It's true. I was just copying and pasting, so... 1, 2, 4, 8, 16+16+16. Close enough. And we'll get three more "guilty"s soon enough.

Are they really still pursuing those last 3 charges? That seems like a waste of time and money. The 45 counts he's already been convicted on are enough to ensure that he'll spend the rest of his life behind bars as it is.

(Also, I can't believe I took the time to count out all the of "guilty"s you wrote. Twice.)
Class of 2013

ugarte

Quote from: jtn27
Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: jtn27
Quote from: ugarteGuilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty. Guilty.

Soon to be joined by Spanier, Curley and Schultz and eternally by the sainted Joe Paterno. What a disgrace.

Unless I counted wrong, you have 3 extra "guilty"s.
It's true. I was just copying and pasting, so... 1, 2, 4, 8, 16+16+16. Close enough. And we'll get three more "guilty"s soon enough.

Are they really still pursuing those last 3 charges? That seems like a waste of time and money. The 45 counts he's already been convicted on are enough to ensure that he'll spend the rest of his life behind bars as it is.

(Also, I can't believe I took the time to count out all the of "guilty"s you wrote. Twice.)
If you hadn't counted, it would have been someone else. 100% sure.

They can't try Sandusky on those three charges: double jeopardy. They can, if they choose, indict him for crimes against other victims, like his son, but they are unlikely to do so as the MINIMUM sentence for these 45 counts is far longer than he will live. That isn't what I meant - I was referring to Curley, Schultz and Spanier.

ugarte

Quote from: ugarte... I was referring to Curley, Schultz and Spanier.
Who are going to go down HARD. And finally, FINALLY there is something that connects Joe Paterno - the man who knew everything that happened in Happy Valley - to more knowledge than he admitted to.

Was it really that hard to see how obvious this was from day one?

George64


Ronald '09

Article on InsideLacrosse has some of Tambroni's reactions to the sanctions.  Considering this scandal was way bigger than the football program and went to the top level of the athletic department and university, I'm not exactly sure I understand why the sanctions were limited to the football program.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/07/23/wake-ncaa-sanctions-penn-state-football-tambroni-assured-nittany-lions-future

KeithK

Quote from: Ronald '09Article on InsideLacrosse has some of Tambroni's reactions to the sanctions.  Considering this scandal was way bigger than the football program and went to the top level of the athletic department and university, I'm not exactly sure I understand why the sanctions were limited to the football program.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/07/23/wake-ncaa-sanctions-penn-state-football-tambroni-assured-nittany-lions-future
While the AD and University officials may be implicated in the scandal is there any evidence that coaches and staff from other sports had any involvement or knowledge of the Sandusky affair? If not then why punish those involved with these other sports?

KeithK

Does anyone else think it's stupid to force Penn State to vacate victories from '98 to '10?  What happened was horrible but  didn't really have anything to do with the results on the field (as a scandal involving cheating, ineligible players or such would). Paterno is still the winningest D1 coach even if the NCAA wants to pretend that he's not on top of the list anymore. Of all the well deserved sanctions this one seems petty.

ftyuv

I dunno, it makes sense to me. His wins came, in part, from having established an environment in which winning came above all else -- or at least above child molestation, which I'd argue is a pretty damn high bar. I have to admit I don't know a whole lot about Penn State's football team, but I'd guess the assistant coach had something to do with the team's success. If he shouldn't have been there, the wins he helped get are tainted. The message it sends is that if wins mean so much to you that you're willing to cover for a guy like Sandusky, then you don't get the wins.

Anyway, these records are all about the legacy a person leaves behind. I think it's fair of the NCAA to say they don't feel he deserves that legacy, and this is about the only way they can take it away from him. The alternatives I can think of are to put an asterisk by his name on all NCAA material, with the footnote reading "also helped cover up a huge child molestation scandal," or to publish records for Winningest Coaches Who Weren't Implicated In Huge Child Molestation Scandals.

Beeeej

Quote from: KeithKDoes anyone else think it's stupid to force Penn State to vacate victories from '98 to '10?  What happened was horrible but  didn't really have anything to do with the results on the field (as a scandal involving cheating, ineligible players or such would). Paterno is still the winningest D1 coach even if the NCAA wants to pretend that he's not on top of the list anymore. Of all the well deserved sanctions this one seems petty.

Can you say with certainty that they would have won those games if there had been arrests and news of child sexual abuse involving the Penn State football program in 1998?  Recruiting, hiring, funding, all of that could have been and likely would have been affected.

I don't think it seems petty at all, and I agree with the earlier poster who suggested that the message is, "If wins are so precious to you that they're more important than the safety of children, then we will take away what's most precious to you."
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

Ronald '09

Quote from: KeithK
Quote from: Ronald '09Article on InsideLacrosse has some of Tambroni's reactions to the sanctions.  Considering this scandal was way bigger than the football program and went to the top level of the athletic department and university, I'm not exactly sure I understand why the sanctions were limited to the football program.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/07/23/wake-ncaa-sanctions-penn-state-football-tambroni-assured-nittany-lions-future
While the AD and University officials may be implicated in the scandal is there any evidence that coaches and staff from other sports had any involvement or knowledge of the Sandusky affair? If not then why punish those involved with these other sports?

I don't know about involvement but certainly there is at least the appearance that there was some knowledge. There's no proof he knows, but the basketball coach left after a good year by Penn State standards for Navy. I'm not suggesting he was involved but to leave Penn State for Navy there has to be some reason. I'm thinking he knew to the extent that he would think "I won't want to be at this school anymore soon.  It won't be a good place to work."

Josh '99

Quote from: Ronald '09
Quote from: KeithK
Quote from: Ronald '09Article on InsideLacrosse has some of Tambroni's reactions to the sanctions.  Considering this scandal was way bigger than the football program and went to the top level of the athletic department and university, I'm not exactly sure I understand why the sanctions were limited to the football program.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/07/23/wake-ncaa-sanctions-penn-state-football-tambroni-assured-nittany-lions-future
While the AD and University officials may be implicated in the scandal is there any evidence that coaches and staff from other sports had any involvement or knowledge of the Sandusky affair? If not then why punish those involved with these other sports?

I don't know about involvement but certainly there is at least the appearance that there was some knowledge. There's no proof he knows, but the basketball coach left after a good year by Penn State standards for Navy. I'm not suggesting he was involved but to leave Penn State for Navy there has to be some reason. I'm thinking he knew to the extent that he would think "I won't want to be at this school anymore soon.  It won't be a good place to work."
Tambroni left Cornell after making the national semifinals for a much less-established lacrosse program in Penn State, and he had perfectly reasonable non-scandal-related (as far as we know, at least) reasons for doing so.  I don't think there's any cause to assume that the former Penn State basketball coach didn't have equally normal reasons for doing so.
"They do all kind of just blend together into one giant dildo."
-Ben Rocky 04

Jordan 04

Quote from: Josh '99
Quote from: Ronald '09
Quote from: KeithK
Quote from: Ronald '09Article on InsideLacrosse has some of Tambroni's reactions to the sanctions.  Considering this scandal was way bigger than the football program and went to the top level of the athletic department and university, I'm not exactly sure I understand why the sanctions were limited to the football program.

http://insidelacrosse.com/news/2012/07/23/wake-ncaa-sanctions-penn-state-football-tambroni-assured-nittany-lions-future
While the AD and University officials may be implicated in the scandal is there any evidence that coaches and staff from other sports had any involvement or knowledge of the Sandusky affair? If not then why punish those involved with these other sports?

I don't know about involvement but certainly there is at least the appearance that there was some knowledge. There's no proof he knows, but the basketball coach left after a good year by Penn State standards for Navy. I'm not suggesting he was involved but to leave Penn State for Navy there has to be some reason. I'm thinking he knew to the extent that he would think "I won't want to be at this school anymore soon.  It won't be a good place to work."
Tambroni left Cornell after making the national semifinals for a much less-established lacrosse program in Penn State, and he had perfectly reasonable non-scandal-related (as far as we know, at least) reasons for doing so.  I don't think there's any cause to assume that the former Penn State basketball coach didn't have equally normal reasons for doing so.

Tambroni didn't take a huge pay cut, though, did he?

ETA: Not that I think one way or the other on the PSU b-ball coach. It's all just speculation.  Every situation is different.

billhoward

Quote from: KeithKDoes anyone else think it's stupid to force Penn State to vacate victories from '98 to '10?  What happened was horrible but  didn't really have anything to do with the results on the field (as a scandal involving cheating, ineligible players or such would). Paterno is still the winningest D1 coach even if the NCAA wants to pretend that he's not on top of the list anymore. Of all the well deserved sanctions this one seems petty.
It seemed silly at first. Now it makes sense. No one in a barroom or column or TV segment can say "No matter, Paterno was the winningest coach of all time" without having to add a reference to the sanctions. That amplifies and keeps alive the memory of the NCAA's power to crush.

Next time the NCAA cracks down on OSU, one of the penalties should to forbid them from saying The Ohio State University. It's more offensive than whatever North Dakota wore on the front of their jerseys.

Waiting for the final word from Ugarte.

ugarte

Quote from: billhoward
Quote from: KeithKDoes anyone else think it's stupid to force Penn State to vacate victories from '98 to '10?  What happened was horrible but  didn't really have anything to do with the results on the field (as a scandal involving cheating, ineligible players or such would). Paterno is still the winningest D1 coach even if the NCAA wants to pretend that he's not on top of the list anymore. Of all the well deserved sanctions this one seems petty.
It seemed silly at first. Now it makes sense. No one in a barroom or column or TV segment can say "No matter, Paterno was the winningest coach of all time" without having to add a reference to the sanctions. That amplifies and keeps alive the memory of the NCAA's power to crush.

Next time the NCAA cracks down on OSU, one of the penalties should to forbid them from saying The Ohio State University. It's more offensive than whatever North Dakota wore on the front of their jerseys.

Waiting for the final word from Ugarte.
The OSU/Sioux joke should be stricken from the record. Stop trying so hard to be funny and sometimes just say a thing that you mean.