Cornell 6 UQTR 3

Started by Trotsky, October 21, 2010, 08:44:35 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Trotsky

Another Mets-ridden summer survived.  Drop the puck.

Scoring:

1 00:52 Cor Roeszler (Mowrey)
1 14:59 Cor pp J. Devin (Roeszler, Miller)
1 17:34 Cor Roeszler (Esposito, Birch)
1 18:28 Cor sh J. Devin (Ross, Miller)
1 19:12 Cor D'Agostino (de Swardt)
2 08:11 Que Bellevance-Martin (Charland)
3 06:30 Que pp Demers (Charland, Henri-Frechette)
3 07:51 Que Charland (Breton, Lessard)
3 10:58 Cor de Swardt (Birch)

Rosey

Quote from: TrotskyAnother Mets-ridden summer survived.
If it hurts so much to keep punching yourself in the nuts, then why do you do it? ;-)
[ homepage ]

Trotsky

Quote from: Kyle Rose
Quote from: TrotskyAnother Mets-ridden summer survived.
If it hurts so much to keep punching yourself in the nuts, then why do you do it? ;-)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C4p2iZTIDog&feature=related

RobertSchur

Any reason this game is listed on my season tickets schedule (lower right corner of the sheet) as a "scrimmage" instead of exhibition?  Is there some significant difference?  Tomorrow's game is still an exhibition.

Josh '99

Quote from: RobertSchurAny reason this game is listed on my season tickets schedule (lower right corner of the sheet) as a "scrimmage" instead of exhibition?  Is there some significant difference?  Tomorrow's game is still an exhibition.
This is completely just a guess, but maybe an exhibition is a game played under standard rules, whereas a scrimmage can be structured in a more freeform manner (like how they work in breakaways and stuff into the R/W scrimmage)?
"They do all kind of just blend together into one giant dildo."
-Ben Rocky 04

WillCMJr

Some "drivel" for you...  My wife is at the game while I'm stuck at work.  Apparently the team is wearing the "new" jersey's described in the RW game thread.  B.U. style, if you will.

Trotsky

Quote from: Josh '99
Quote from: RobertSchurAny reason this game is listed on my season tickets schedule (lower right corner of the sheet) as a "scrimmage" instead of exhibition?  Is there some significant difference?  Tomorrow's game is still an exhibition.
This is completely just a guess, but maybe an exhibition is a game played under standard rules, whereas a scrimmage can be structured in a more freeform manner (like how they work in breakaways and stuff into the R/W scrimmage)?
Interesting idea.

Video up, as is the gain (off the charts).

WillCMJr

"An exhibition game (also known as an exhibition match, exhibition, demonstration, demo, exhibit or friendly) is a sporting event in which there is no competitive value of any significant kind to any competitor (such as tournament or season rankings, or prize money) regardless of the outcome of the competition. The games can be held between separate teams or between parts of the same team. Quality of play is generally valued over the end result. The term scrimmage is also sometimes used, especially with regard to team sports, but is ambiguous because it has other meanings even in that context. Another synonym is preparation match."

nyc94

Dartmouth beat UQTR 7-6 on Sunday.  Princeton beat them 5-4 last night.

ajh258

Second period looked more like typical big red hockey: lots of blocks and clears, and a lack of offensive organization.

Also, looks like they changed the jersey.

Josh '99

Quote from: ajh258Also, looks like they changed the jersey.
EW.  ::barf::
"They do all kind of just blend together into one giant dildo."
-Ben Rocky 04

ajh258

Facing the first "real" opponent for this season, the men's icers' performed with... you guessed it, "mediocrity" this Thursday.

While the Red had a scoring frenzy in during the first period, it was probably because UQTR had a difficult time adjusting to our more physical style of play, which probably contributed to a lot of their defensive letdowns. Roeszler and J. Devin both had great starts, each scoring two goals that put the Red solidly on top; D'Agostino also had a beautiful solo backhand goal, created from a breakaway pass by Miller.

During the second and most of the third, it was more of the same for the Red, as the team buckled down to their "defensive mode" and played the systematic style of hockey that fans are familiar with.

The most impressive performance was probably from two freshmen - Dustin Mowrey and Kirill Gotovets. Both players were quick on their feet, knew where to position themselves in anticipation of the puck, and demonstrated an ability to maneuver commonly-used defensive tactics. Although they weren't first shift, they were certainly second or third and saw a great deal of ice time.

Mike Garman, apparent starting goalie for this year, gave away 3 goals from 26 SOGs. He moved around the goal a bit and was reminiscent of a less-experience Ben Scrivens, although Garman's technical skills were probably better. Garman made some critical saves and demonstrated some impressive reaction skills as well.

Overall, it was more of the same from last year, with some expected new faces and some old ones getting more ice time. Schafer's system definitely still defines much of the team's strategy, although the freshmen forwards were bringing on a new level of energy that energized our seasoned veterans. If this is the way the Red performs for the rest of the year, we are definitely in the running for a top 4 finish in the ECAC, and perhaps another chance at defending the Whitelaw Trophy. Stay tuned Lynah Faithful, the rebuilding season is off to a better-than-expected groundbreaking.

Towerroad

I agree with most of your analysis. It is important to note that UQTR was playing it's 3rd travel game in 5 days so fatigue might have been a factor in the first period.

I saw the puck skated into the offensive zone much more regularly than in the past where we would dump and chase. Same for the power play.

UQTR did adapt after the first period and arguably won the next 2 periods so I think there is a lot of work to do.

profudge

Couple of observations:
  • We did poorly on face offs  first 2 periods and finally started getting better in 3rd - looks  like an area we need to work on.
  • First period we were hustling and  QTR was not fore-checking hard - In the Second and Third  they pressured us  more in our end and were more successful at holding puck in our zone some.
  • Patrick Kennedy did not play.
  • QTR goal on the PP was a pretty play and a great setup pass - Garman  didn't seem to have much chance on that.  
  • Other 2 QTR goals  seemed to me, that we missed a defensive assignment and someone was left open in close to stuff the puck in the net.

Overall - I am encouraged  by hustle and energy levels.   The Freshman class looks  strong.   Esposito  was flying...   QTR  goalie  played very well, 38 saves.   Jillson had 3 good looks/shots in early part of game and put all 3 a bit high or wide;  goals will be coming there as season rolls on, I am sure.
Game  was  enjoyable.   Lots to improve on  but  not a  bad  first exhibition.
- Lou (Swarthmore MotherPucker 69-74, Stowe Slugs78-82, Hanover Storm Kings 83-85...) Big Red Fan since the 70's

scoop85

I knew Kennedy was out, but I didn't notice Chris Moulson -- did he sit out as well?