ECAC Playoff Possibilities Stuff

Started by jtwcornell91, February 15, 2015, 05:21:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

TimV

We can finish fourth.  We need to sweep B and Y.  Q needs to sweep @D and @H. Col has to lose to Y and B.  That's all.::banana::::banana::
"Yo Paulie - I don't see no crowd gathering 'round you neither."

upprdeck

dont we win a tie breaker with harvard and Colgate? is the first tie broken on head to head so even if they both split and we sweep we would beat them both?

even getting to 5th means princeton round 1 so some value there

BearLover

Quote from: TimVWe can finish fourth.  We need to sweep B and Y.  Q needs to sweep @D and @H. Col has to lose to Y and B.  That's all.::banana::::banana::
We don't need to have Colgate lose to either of them, if the tiebreaker is head-to-head.

Trotsky

Quote from: TimVWe can finish fourth.  We need to sweep B and Y.  Q needs to sweep @D and @H. Col has to lose to Y and B.  That's all.::banana::::banana::
We can even finish 3rd.

jtwcornell91

Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: TimVWe can finish fourth.  We need to sweep B and Y.  Q needs to sweep @D and @H. Col has to lose to Y and B.  That's all.::banana::::banana::
We don't need to have Colgate lose to either of them, if the tiebreaker is head-to-head.
http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2015/ecac.tiebreakers.shtml

BearLover

Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: TimVWe can finish fourth.  We need to sweep B and Y.  Q needs to sweep @D and @H. Col has to lose to Y and B.  That's all.::banana::::banana::
We don't need to have Colgate lose to either of them, if the tiebreaker is head-to-head.
http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2015/ecac.tiebreakers.shtml
So correct me if I'm wrong, but if Q and us win out, we get a bye, right?

Dafatone

Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: TimVWe can finish fourth.  We need to sweep B and Y.  Q needs to sweep @D and @H. Col has to lose to Y and B.  That's all.::banana::::banana::
We don't need to have Colgate lose to either of them, if the tiebreaker is head-to-head.
http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2015/ecac.tiebreakers.shtml
So correct me if I'm wrong, but if Q and us win out, we get a bye, right?

I think if Colgate beats Brown and ties Yale, we'd wind up behind both Colgate and Yale.

So we need to sweep, for Q to sweep, and for Colgate and Yale to not tie.  That's... actually somewhat doable.

BearLover

Quote from: Dafatone
Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: TimVWe can finish fourth.  We need to sweep B and Y.  Q needs to sweep @D and @H. Col has to lose to Y and B.  That's all.::banana::::banana::
We don't need to have Colgate lose to either of them, if the tiebreaker is head-to-head.
http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2015/ecac.tiebreakers.shtml
So correct me if I'm wrong, but if Q and us win out, we get a bye, right?

I think if Colgate beats Brown and ties Yale, we'd wind up behind both Colgate and Yale.

So we need to sweep, for Q to sweep, and for Colgate and Yale to not tie.  That's... actually somewhat doable.
Ah, yes, didn't consider the tie--good call.

jtwcornell91


Trotsky

Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: Dafatone
Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: jtwcornell91
Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: TimVWe can finish fourth.  We need to sweep B and Y.  Q needs to sweep @D and @H. Col has to lose to Y and B.  That's all.::banana::::banana::
We don't need to have Colgate lose to either of them, if the tiebreaker is head-to-head.
http://www.elynah.com/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2015/ecac.tiebreakers.shtml
So correct me if I'm wrong, but if Q and us win out, we get a bye, right?

I think if Colgate beats Brown and ties Yale, we'd wind up behind both Colgate and Yale.

So we need to sweep, for Q to sweep, and for Colgate and Yale to not tie.  That's... actually somewhat doable.
Ah, yes, didn't consider the tie--good call.

Quoted just for the bananas.


Scersk '97

If one follows the current KRACH in filling in the winners of the final games, the only "un-KRACH-y" thing that needs to happen for us to end up in 4th is for us to beat Yale.

Of course, that means two nights of 4 road winners and 2 home winners, which seems a bit unlikely to me... but... eh... still... it's oddly comforting. It could happen!

PS Ah-ha! Glad for that postponed Beanpot! Hope BC and Harvard play a long, bruising consie; can always hope for a DQ for Vesey.

jtwcornell91

Quote from: Scersk '97If one follows the current KRACH in filling in the winners of the final games, the only "un-KRACH-y" thing that needs to happen for us to end up in 4th is for us to beat Yale.

Of course, that means two nights of 4 road winners and 2 home winners, which seems a bit unlikely to me... but... eh... still... it's oddly comforting. It could happen!

PS Ah-ha! Glad for that postponed Beanpot! Hope BC and Harvard play a long, bruising consie; can always hope for a DQ for Vesey.

I was going to suggest using KASA but it looks like the CHN page isn't there, and I don't think I ever got around to adding it to my geek scripts although I do now have gone and away data.

Give My Regards

Quote from: jtwcornell91Paging Bill Fenwick...

Here you go, have at it...
http://elf.elynah.com/read.php?1,197490
If you lead a good life, go to Sunday school and church, and say your prayers every night, when you die, you'll go to LYNAH!