Red-White Post Game

[Ack]

Awesome more than one would be sweet, but not 3? Murray was a year ahead of Hornby.  Couldn't they only have played 3 together?  Or are you counting all games with either Murray or Hornby? '99,'00,'01,'02?

[Jordan 04]

[Q]Ack Wrote:

 How many Murray-Hornby Red/White games have you seen?[/q]

There may have only been three of them, but Murray and Hornby in the '01 game was the first thing I thought about when I read Ari's post about the fight.  It didn't really devolve into an all-out fight between the two, but they definitly went at it a couple of times during the game.

I wouldn't worry too much about Moulson and Gleed.  This is the first chance the guys have had in a while to go out there and knock people around in a real game setting, so things are bound to happen.  That, and I trust Coach to be able to resolve any internal issue on the team.

[Jordan 04]

[Q]calgARI '07 Wrote:

 [Q2]Ack Wrote:

 How many Murray-Hornby Red/White games have you seen?[/Q]
4[/q]

Huh??

[redhair34]

http://cornellbigred.collegesports.com/sports/m-hockey/recaps/101505aaa.html

no mention of the fight

[mjh89]

but a mention of me!

[Give My Regards]

[Q]calgARI '07 Wrote:
Fontas can practice with the team but can't play until next season as far as I know but I believe he'll be a junior then.  My understanding of the rule is that if you transfer to a school out of conference you only lose a semester but when Ben Lovejoy transferred to Dartmouth from BC he sat out the whole year.[/q]

Unless the rule has changed, any player who transfers from one DI school to another must sit out a full year before playing for his new team.  The only eaception I can think of is if a school folds its team, like Fairfield and Iona did a few years ago.  In that instance, players from the disappearing team can transfer to another DI school and play immediately.  A player who goes from a DI school to a DIII can also play at the new school immediately.

[Dpperk29]

hedge made his statement in the shootout... not bad skating for a ref

-Perk

[atb9]

[Q]Oat Wrote:
If you give me a roster, I can probably divide up the players and make the teams more evenly matched than what we saw tonight.[/q]

There is a reason why McKee was on the White team--the teams were not even.

[Trotsky]

[Q]redhair34 Wrote:

 

no mention of the fight[/q]

Not a bad idea.

[KeithK]

I'm sure Schafer divided up the teams the way he did intentionally.  No idea what the rationales were, but I'm sure he had a plan and it wasn't to have the most balanced teams possible.

[sen '08]

mjh-Do you have any more idea of what happened with the fight between Moulson and Gleed, since you were closer to the action?

[Lauren '06]

[Q]Daniel Wrote:

 I think there was mostly shock. The audience wasn't very vocal overall throughout the game, but when the fight occurred, there was a lot of action around the A/O sec. open goal, so I know I was  looking there. Then I followed the  puck back to center ice and saw the guys fighting there. I dont even think the refs noticed until then, either. So basically we were shocked/in disbelief/speechless. I think that is pretty accurate.[/q]
Some people on the N/O side tried starting Let's Go Red to try and overcome the speechlessness, but it was snuffed out pretty quickly.  I imagine the people around them gave them serious looks.  I was certainly in no mood to cheer.

[Doug]

According to one of my residents, a club hockey player who was on the ice, the fight was not staged.  He said that Gleed and Moulson were "cool" with each other afterwords in the locker room.

Also, he said that coach was HAPPY that the players were "finally showing some intensity"

Apparently everyone in the locker room downplayed the fight, including coach.

[mjh89]

Apparently Moulson slept with Gleed's mother last weekend ... Just Kidding. Don't read too much into it. Hockey is a tough game to play competitively against friends; they were playing hard and one or the other of them probably just took offense to some of the things that transpired during the game. It's over, not a big deal.

[David Harding]

[Q]fenwick Wrote:

 [Q2]calgARI '07 Wrote:
Fontas can practice with the team but can't play until next season as far as I know but I believe he'll be a junior then.  My understanding of the rule is that if you transfer to a school out of conference you only lose a semester but when Ben Lovejoy transferred to Dartmouth from BC he sat out the whole year.[/Q]
Unless the rule has changed, any player who transfers from one DI school to another must sit out a full year before playing for his new team.  The only eaception I can think of is if a school folds its team, like Fairfield and Iona did a few years ago.  In that instance, players from the disappearing team can transfer to another DI school and play immediately.  A player who goes from a DI school to a DIII can also play at the new school immediately.[/q]
The Athletics Department recap of the game (http://cornellbigred.collegesports.com/sports/m-hockey/recaps/101505aaa.html) reiterates the rule as practicing but not playing for a full year.  I'm pretty sure that the University can't pay for his travel with the team during that period, either.