Friday 2/18 other scores

[DeltaOne81]

1-0 BU on top of UMass early, at the Mullins Center

[Ken \'70]

Hahvahd 1 Clarkson 0
Brown 0 SLU 1

[Ken \'70]

Princeton 2 Dartmouth 1
end of 1st

[KeithK]

[rant]It's really freaking annoying when folks on the USCHO score threads refuse to actually include the score anywhere in their posts.  The comment that so and so scores for Providence doesn't help me figure out what the score in that game is![/rant]

[KeithK]

UML 3, BC 1
MSU 1, OSU 0 (end 1)

[jy3]

[Q]KeithK Wrote:

 It's really freaking annoying when folks on the USCHO score threads refuse to actually include the score anywhere in their posts.  The comment that so and so scores for Providence doesn't help me figure out what the score in that game is!
[/q]

this is SO true
things going well for ecac teams 2nite (i think)
'gate 2 onion 1
umassL 3 bc 1
bgsu 2 wmu 1
minne d 0 du 0
slu(T) 1 brown 0
princeton 3 dc 1
tosu 0 michigan state 1
maine 1 providence 2
bu 1 umass 0
nebr 0 lssu 0
hahvahd 4 clarkson 0
cornell 3 rpi 0
uvm 4 yale 0
umich notre dame at 0
~conceivably tosu beating mich state might be better and bu losing to umass better and dc winning might be better but wmu losing is good i think and maine losing is good and bc losing would be nice. of course these games arent done

[DeltaOne81]

BU now up 2-0 on UMass
still MSU 1, OSU 0, 4 minutes into the 2nd

[ganderson]

Why is WMU losing good for us?  If BGU wins they're another TUC for the CCHA.

[DeltaOne81]

3-0 MSU, 6 minutes left in the 2nd

ganderson, I don't think jy3 necessarily meant that every single one of those were good, just that mostly its not bad tonight

[billhoward]

Nice idea using a separate thread for that evening's scores rather stuff them into the running game commentary or the postgame which (I thought) ought to be postgame commentary and sniping.

[Trotsky]

Yes, excellent idea.  Maine down 3-1 to Providence would reduce out SOS a tad.

[DeltaOne81]

[Q]billhoward Wrote:

 Nice idea using a separate thread for that evening's scores rather stuff them into the running game commentary or the postgame which (I thought) ought to be postgame commentary and sniping. [/q]
Agreed, thanks, and I remembered your complaint when I did it

[ganderson]

Princetion 6 Dartmouth 1    :-O

That's not going to be good for Darmouth's RPI.  

[jy3]

[Q]ganderson Wrote:

 Why is WMU losing good for us?  If BGU wins they're another TUC for the CCHA.[/q]


didnt look at it myself but the way adam wrote his article for bracketology i had thought that wmu losing would push them below .500 and didnt realize bgsu was at .4999
"Western Michigan at Bowling Green â€" How big of a fan do you think Michigan, Ohio State and NMU are of the Falcons right now? Their RPI is .5001 with the bonus. Two losses by the Falcons and those wins by OSU, NMU and Michigan against BG disappear like the wind..." - guess i thought the falcons were wmu and didnt read the last part of the paragraph
http://www.uscho.com/news/2005/02/15_009961.php

[billhoward]

[Q]ganderson Wrote:

 Princetion 6 Dartmouth 1    

That's not going to be good for Darmouth's RPI.  [/q]

Maybe it will psyche up the men of Dartmouth and get them to take it out on Harvard next week.