HARVARD SUCKS

[Trotsky]

Charette's having a good night, too.  It is hard to exaggerate how much of an ass-whupping this is so far.

JFC Cantabs you had one job.

[stereax]

Charette's having a good night, too.  It is hard to exaggerate how much of an ass-whupping this is so far.

JFC Cantabs you had one job.

Put this on from the beginning when I get home to huff that sweet sweet Harvard Sucks energy?

[marty]

3-zip, 16 mins in.

It's not as close as the score.

Didn't realize NESN sold the exclusive rights. ESPN owns so much.

Also,  very nice video. 

[ugarte]

4-1 now. Either someone's got a hat trick or got reverse-Castagna'd but I wasn't paying enough attention.

[stereax]

"Fuck BU" chants. Bless

[imafrshmn]

"Fuck BU" chants. Bless

Good heavens! Send the mouthwash! Send the earmuffs! Unbecoming, unrefined, and boorish behavior from the Harvard and Radcliffe coeds.

[Trotsky]

We stay 7 in NPI despite Harvard's entirely foreseeable humiliation.

[TimV]

"Fuck BU" chants. Bless

Good heavens! Send the mouthwash! Send the earmuffs! Unbecoming, unrefined, and boorish behavior from the Harvard and Radcliffe coeds.

Northeastern was the perp, not Harvard.  No Ivy League fans would do that.

[stereax]

"Fuck BU" chants. Bless

Good heavens! Send the mouthwash! Send the earmuffs! Unbecoming, unrefined, and boorish behavior from the Harvard and Radcliffe coeds.

Northeastern was the perp, not Harvard.  No Ivy League fans would do that.

This assumes Harvard even has fans.

[JasonN95]

I'm sure I'm forgetting something but it sure feels that for the last 30 years Harvard, one of the stronger teams intra-conference-wise, has done nothing to elevate the conference's profile. For much of the late 90s/early 00s it was pretty much just Cornell tamping down "EZAC" jabs and Cornell has continued to represent well. More recently Q has also brought a lot of victories for the league and Yale and Union had their glorious runs to NCAA championships. Harvard, zilch.

[Will]

I'm sure I'm forgetting something but it sure feels that for the last 30 years Harvard, one of the stronger teams intra-conference-wise, has done nothing to elevate the conference's profile. For much of the late 90s/early 00s it was pretty much just Cornell tamping down "EZAC" jabs and Cornell has continued to represent well. More recently Q has also brought a lot of victories for the league and Yale and Union had their glorious runs to NCAA championships. Harvard, zilch.

In fairness, as much as it pains me to admit it, Harvard has a Frozen Four appearance more recent than us (2017). It's not a national championship this millennium like Q, Union, and Yale get to brag about, but it's not nothing either.

[Beeeej]

I'm sure I'm forgetting something but it sure feels that for the last 30 years Harvard, one of the stronger teams intra-conference-wise, has done nothing to elevate the conference's profile. For much of the late 90s/early 00s it was pretty much just Cornell tamping down "EZAC" jabs and Cornell has continued to represent well. More recently Q has also brought a lot of victories for the league and Yale and Union had their glorious runs to NCAA championships. Harvard, zilch.

In fairness, as much as it pains me to admit it, Harvard has a Frozen Four appearance more recent than us (2017). It's not a national championship this millennium like Q, Union, and Yale get to brag about, but it's not nothing either.

Yup, I was gonna say... that was at the tail end of an almost absurd run of one-and-dones for Harvard, but they did end the run. In the meantime, we have an even more absurd run of two-and-dones, and that's almost more painful because of what's on the other side of it.

[RichH]

I'm sure I'm forgetting something but it sure feels that for the last 30 years Harvard, one of the stronger teams intra-conference-wise, has done nothing to elevate the conference's profile. For much of the late 90s/early 00s it was pretty much just Cornell tamping down "EZAC" jabs and Cornell has continued to represent well. More recently Q has also brought a lot of victories for the league and Yale and Union had their glorious runs to NCAA championships. Harvard, zilch.

In fairness, as much as it pains me to admit it, Harvard has a Frozen Four appearance more recent than us (2017). It's not a national championship this millennium like Q, Union, and Yale get to brag about, but it's not nothing either.

Still didn't stop me from celebrating like a loon and amusing everyone in my section in Chicago when they lost.

[Jim Hyla]

I'm sure I'm forgetting something but it sure feels that for the last 30 years Harvard, one of the stronger teams intra-conference-wise, has done nothing to elevate the conference's profile. For much of the late 90s/early 00s it was pretty much just Cornell tamping down "EZAC" jabs and Cornell has continued to represent well. More recently Q has also brought a lot of victories for the league and Yale and Union had their glorious runs to NCAA championships. Harvard, zilch.

In fairness, as much as it pains me to admit it, Harvard has a Frozen Four appearance more recent than us (2017). It's not a national championship this millennium like Q, Union, and Yale get to brag about, but it's not nothing either.

Yup, I was gonna say... that was at the tail end of an almost absurd run of one-and-dones for Harvard, but they did end the run. In the meantime, we have an even more absurd run of two-and-dones, and that's almost more painful because of what's on the other side of it.

I'm glad you said almost.

I'd rather go and lose, compared to not going. Last year beating MSU, losing to BU is better than not getting to play BU.

I know people complain about always not making the FF. But I'd take what we've done over any of the ECAC schools that did eventualy win it all. Never Q and would anybody want to be Yale or Union now?

[Beeeej]

I'm sure I'm forgetting something but it sure feels that for the last 30 years Harvard, one of the stronger teams intra-conference-wise, has done nothing to elevate the conference's profile. For much of the late 90s/early 00s it was pretty much just Cornell tamping down "EZAC" jabs and Cornell has continued to represent well. More recently Q has also brought a lot of victories for the league and Yale and Union had their glorious runs to NCAA championships. Harvard, zilch.

In fairness, as much as it pains me to admit it, Harvard has a Frozen Four appearance more recent than us (2017). It's not a national championship this millennium like Q, Union, and Yale get to brag about, but it's not nothing either.

Yup, I was gonna say... that was at the tail end of an almost absurd run of one-and-dones for Harvard, but they did end the run. In the meantime, we have an even more absurd run of two-and-dones, and that's almost more painful because of what's on the other side of it.

I'm glad you said almost.

I'd rather go and lose, compared to not going. Last year beating MSU, losing to BU is better than not getting to play BU.

I know people complain about always not making the FF. But I'd take what we've done over any of the ECAC schools that did eventualy win it all. Never Q and would anybody want to be Yale or Union now?

I don't disagree generally, but last year is also a unique example. Given where we were at the end of the regular season, nobody truly thought we'd make that kind of run, even if we desperately hoped for it. Even to get to MSU in the first place required us beating Yale, upsetting Colgate best two of three away from home, upsetting Q in utterly absurd fashion, and upsetting Clarkson. Then MSU was the biggest upset of them all.  At a certain point we were well past cake and everything else was icing.