Lynah Attendance

Started by BearLover, December 08, 2025, 12:02:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

RichH

Quote from: Trotsky on December 09, 2025, 03:21:15 PM
Quote from: BearLover on December 09, 2025, 03:16:07 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on December 09, 2025, 01:38:43 PM
Quote from: BearLover on December 09, 2025, 01:13:50 PMI think maximizing revenue is at odds with maximizing atmosphere.

Ding ding ding.
I think this can be fixed. Cornell athletics isn't a for-profit company.

If only this was still true.  We have the same disease as the rest of the world.  I am sure the time is coming when we will have to pay an annual subscription to keep our degrees.

The last banker strangled with the entrails of the last realtor.  It's the only way.

Charlie Moore literally called himself the "CEO of Athletics" when he was AD.

FD2024

When my son went to Clarkson University from 2016 - 2020 the hockey tickets were free for students with their ID. I think without student ID they were like $6.00

Trotsky

Quote from: Al DeFlorio on December 09, 2025, 08:09:01 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on December 09, 2025, 05:09:32 PMDidn't Ned have a private jet called "Above It All"?
Back in the 60s, Cornell had a DC3 named "The Far Above."
That was it.

Trotsky

#48
Quote from: adamw on December 09, 2025, 11:45:01 PMThis has been an evergreen topic in all of college hockey for 20 years. Steady decline everywhere, except for a handful of places. And even those places are subject to decline when their team falls out of the top 20. Even Western Michigan - known for its "lunatics" and fresh off a national championship, had extremely meh attendance this past weekend against a good Duluth team.

I don't like it either - but it's not a Cornell problem - and there's likely very little anyone can do about it. Cornell has to be a consistent top 5 team for like half a season in order to fill Lynah like it used to.

Is top 5 significantly different from top 20?  I don't know that the greater Cornell community is looking at USCHO.

Don't they just need to win, and in particular at home?  I believe Bear's laudable goal of +500 per game is doable with an improvement of word of mouth and an improvement of marketing and atmosphere.  This will however require the university to stop treating students like farm animals to slaughter for revenue.  The sport has its own beautiful grassroots traditions.  It doesn't need geegaws and gimmicks.  Just let it bloom.  Take everybody with a bright idea for monetizing it and throw them bodily off the roof of Bradfield.  Monetize that.  I would pay good money to watch Flight of the Provosts.

ugarte

Quote from: Trotsky on December 10, 2025, 01:54:52 PM
Quote from: adamw on December 09, 2025, 11:45:01 PMThis has been an evergreen topic in all of college hockey for 20 years. Steady decline everywhere, except for a handful of places. And even those places are subject to decline when their team falls out of the top 20. Even Western Michigan - known for its "lunatics" and fresh off a national championship, had extremely meh attendance this past weekend against a good Duluth team.

I don't like it either - but it's not a Cornell problem - and there's likely very little anyone can do about it. Cornell has to be a consistent top 5 team for like half a season in order to fill Lynah like it used to.

Is top 5 significantly different from top 20?  I don't know that the greater Cornell community is looking at USCHO.
Top 5 means the campus is buzzing about a possible national championship. Top 20 means we're 7-4 in December.

BearLover

Quote from: ugarte on December 10, 2025, 03:14:17 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on December 10, 2025, 01:54:52 PM
Quote from: adamw on December 09, 2025, 11:45:01 PMThis has been an evergreen topic in all of college hockey for 20 years. Steady decline everywhere, except for a handful of places. And even those places are subject to decline when their team falls out of the top 20. Even Western Michigan - known for its "lunatics" and fresh off a national championship, had extremely meh attendance this past weekend against a good Duluth team.

I don't like it either - but it's not a Cornell problem - and there's likely very little anyone can do about it. Cornell has to be a consistent top 5 team for like half a season in order to fill Lynah like it used to.

Is top 5 significantly different from top 20?  I don't know that the greater Cornell community is looking at USCHO.
Top 5 means the campus is buzzing about a possible national championship. Top 20 means we're 7-4 in December.
I honestly don't think it really matters. Sure, if we totally suck and are noncompetitive in most home games then that will hurt attendance. But the missing fans are the casuals who have absolutely no idea what our national ranking is. We're in a period of incredible sustained success, back to back ECAC champs, 7 NCAA appearances in the last 8 seasons, multiple 1-seeds, and  yet in that time the slow decline of Lynah has continued unabated.

500 people per game is a small number so even if winning motivates a few more people to show up, then that's something. But I just haven't seen any correlation in practice.

Once again I want to clarify that despite the decline, we still have by far the best atmosphere in the league and one of the best in the country. It's just way worse than we had before.

ugarte

Quote from: BearLover on December 10, 2025, 03:29:20 PM500 people per game is a small number so even if winning motivates a few more people to show up, then that's something. But I just haven't seen any correlation in practice.
Everybody loves a winner but, like, a WINNER. When I was in college, basketball games were a ghost town (within a couple of years of an Ivy title) but it was buzzing during the 2008-10 Ivy title years. *Columbia* has been selling out (or nearly so) some basketball games because they came close to an ivy title. But the general fact is true: students don't arrive on campus and get inducted into a cult the way most of us probably did.

Will

Quote from: Trotsky on December 10, 2025, 01:54:52 PMThe sport has its own beautiful grassroots traditions.  It doesn't need geegaws and gimmicks.  Just let it bloom.
Traditions mean nothing if you can't get new people in the door to help keep those traditions going.  So, maybe a few gimmicks make for a necessary evil.  Something less than what's happening currently, but not zero either.
Is next year here yet?

adamw

Quote from: Trotsky on December 10, 2025, 01:54:52 PMIs top 5 significantly different from top 20?  I don't know that the greater Cornell community is looking at USCHO.

Of course not. Cornellians are smarter than that.
College Hockey News: http://www.collegehockeynews.com

fastforward

#54
Quote from: Trotsky on December 09, 2025, 05:00:41 AM
Quote from: fastforward on December 08, 2025, 07:13:42 PMWhat about a truly random drawing for 2-4 tickets to a future game (excluding Harvard, obviously) at every game?
I bet that would draw more people in
Just my opinion
Fuck it, include Harvard.  That is a great idea.
Looks like they somewhat took my idea and are giving away tickets!

CORNELL ATHLETICS | TIX-MAS 2025
Day 2 of 12 Days of Tix-Mas is almost wrapped, but there's still time to play!

🎁 Today's Prize:
Enter now for your chance to win two balcony tickets to a Cornell Hockey game.

With less than 7 hours remaining, don't miss your shot. It only takes a moment to enter - and remember, you can play every day for a new prize.

Plus, each play brings you one step closer to the Grand Prize - two tickets to the Cornell Men's Ice Hockey vs. Harvard game! Be sure to check back daily as we continue unwrapping new surprises throughout the 12 Days of Big Red Tix-Mas.

Hurry - enter Day 2 of Tix-Mas before the contest closes!

See you tomorrow for a brand-new prize! 🎁

billhoward

Quote from: Weder on December 08, 2025, 08:37:51 AMHonestly, as I've older I am not totally against having any kind of extra room. Lynah is a much better rink to stand in than to sit in. (Are more people buying alcohol since they expanded who can? When it was more limited I never saw more than a couple people in line.)
Yes! There is no shame in comfortable seats. Or less uncomfortable seats.

Trotsky

Quote from: ugarte on December 10, 2025, 03:45:29 PMBut the general fact is true: students don't arrive on campus and get inducted into a cult the way most of us probably did.

< Panhellenic joke here >

BearLover

#57
The problem: Lynah attendance and energy have been in gradual decline for two decades, but this year has been particularly bad, definitely the worst I've seen in 16+ years of attending games. This has a compounding effect where poor attendance and energy makes the games less fun, thus further depressing ticket sales. It also kills our biggest recruiting advantage.

The goal: Increase attendance by 500 tickets sold per game on average. Achieving this goal would result in a sellout or near-sellout most games and is a highly attainable goal given the size of the student body and surrounding population. 

Possible ideas:
-lower ticket prices.
-package Harvard tickets together with Dartmouth (already happening) and two other games. I.e., to buy Harvard tix, you also have to buy ticket vs Dartmouth and two other games of your choice. People who get this package get first dibs on Harvard tix.
-similar package for Colgate game, which I assume is the second biggest ticket. Eg. to buy a Colgate ticket, also have to buy one other ticket.
-reach out to clubs, graduate programs, frats/sororities to promote group ticket sales. Eg. special deal for vet school if they buy 20 tickets together. Reserve parts of poorly attended sections (eg. F) for poorly attended games (which is most of them) for such ticket blocks.
-sell beer at the games. Bonus of creating rowdier atmosphere. Most other schools already do this.
-better coordination with the band. I don't know how this works but I believe there used to be a considerably larger pep band contingent on average. They should be taking up the top half of A. As it is, A is at least half-empty most games.
-more theme nights (Taylor Swift night or whatever they did last year)
-any other ideas?

People will disagree with some of these, or some may be untenable, which is fine. I'm not suggesting we implement all of them; they're just ideas. But I believe
+500 per game is absolutely achievable if they actually tried.

CU2007

Is Colgate really the 2nd biggest game at this point? Do they send a lot of visiting fans? I would have thought Quinnipiac at this point. I guess Colgate has the advantage of being the only home game on that weekend.

BearLover

Quote from: CU2007 on January 17, 2026, 11:07:27 AMIs Colgate really the 2nd biggest game at this point? Do they send a lot of visiting fans? I would have thought Quinnipiac at this point. I guess Colgate has the advantage of being the only home game on that weekend.
I don't think any team sends many visiting fans other than maybe Clarkson (doubtful). But Colgate has the toothpaste throwing thing (and as you said is the only home game that weekend) so I think that attracts fans. The casual fan has pretty much no idea what Quinnipiac even is. In my experience the Ivy League games see better attendance than the non-Ivy games, probably because the casual fans are familiar with those schools.