Cornell 3 Quinnipiac 2 (ot)

Started by Trotsky, January 20, 2024, 06:29:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Trotsky

Revenge!

Most GA, Schafer:

0 - at Colorado College ... 11  1995-12-27  
0 - at Yale ............... 11  1998-02-08
0 - at Quinnipiac ......... 10  2013-03-16  ECAC QF Game 2
0 - vs Ohio State .........  8  2015-12-29  
1 - at St. Lawrence .......  8  2009-01-30  
[b]4 - at Quinnipiac .........  8  2023-11-17[/b]

Trotsky

Suda out, Mosko moves up, Donaldson the extra skater.  4 of 6 D-men are freshmen.

Trotsky


BearLover

Section A almost completely empty. Will BigDingus try to claim it was full?

dag14

We scored, but I didn't actually see the goal....

dag14


Dunc

Quote from: BearLoverSection A almost completely empty. Will BigDingus try to claim it was full?

Big Dingus is section A didn't u know?
Cornell '24

GO BIG RED

Trotsky

Quote from: dag14We scored, but I didn't actually see the goal....
I finally cracked the code.  I just have to leave the room to pee.

I mean, I'm not sure I have to leave the room...

Trotsky

Updating after the Clarkson loss, winning percentage of derp points in conference:

1. .848 Qpc
 2. .667 Clk
 3. .556 Cgt
    [color=#b31313].556 Cor[/color]
 5. .545 Uni
 6. .487 Brn
 7. .481 SLU
 8. .417 Yal
 9. .394 Hvd
10. .389 Prn
11. .364 RPI
12. .333 Drt

ugarte

This probably correlates strongly with how much we hate Q but... Pecknold coaches them to play with confidence and purpose. Their positioning in the defensive zone is clean, they are aggressive on the forecheck and they don't idly knock the puck back and forth when they have possession. We're holding our own but something about what I'm watching got my typing fingers going.

ugarte

Thank god Fegaras let that one go (and good on Psenicka for calling for it and getting the tip). I was getting mad as hell about two more minutes of the umbrella bullshit on the PP.

Iceberg

The umbrella PP needs to go. Occasionally it works such as on the 2nd goal, but no movement below the faceoff dots makes it too easy for PKers


BearLover

Quote from: IcebergThe umbrella PP needs to go. Occasionally it works such as on the 2nd goal, but no movement below the faceoff dots makes it too easy for PKers
I don't think it "worked" on the 2nd goal. The second goal was a shot from the point that was deflected and didn't have anything to do with the fact the D passed it around at the point repeatedly. The Cornell PP sucks. If the D isn't giving you anything down low and is blocking the passing lanes, shoot it on net for a deflection or rebound. That's how the 2nd goal was scored. Not from endless passing at the blue line.

ugarte

Quote from: BearLover
Quote from: IcebergThe umbrella PP needs to go. Occasionally it works such as on the 2nd goal, but no movement below the faceoff dots makes it too easy for PKers
I don't think it "worked" on the 2nd goal. The second goal was a shot from the point that was deflected and didn't have anything to do with the fact the D passed it around at the point repeatedly. The Cornell PP sucks. If the D isn't giving you anything down low and is blocking the passing lanes, shoot it on net for a deflection or rebound. That's how the 2nd goal was scored. Not from endless passing at the blue line.
I think he's saying the same thing. Ondrej made the play by stepping in front of the defender bodying him and calling for the puck. Possible that he gets benched by Schafer for moving his skates on the interior.