ECAC 2024 Discussion Thread

Started by Trotsky, October 14, 2023, 11:23:44 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Trotsky

That was, unexpectedly, a good article.  Bravo CHN.

dbilmes

It was written by Jane, the Cornell student who reached out to eLynah about the hockey coverage. Kudos to her.

Weder

She's also on the field hockey team. Props to anyone who can balance classes, a varsity sport and the Sun.
3/8/96

Jeff Hopkins '82

Quote from: TrotskyThere's 14 games to go, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark, and we're wearing sunglasses.

Hit it!

upprdeck

this 3 losses are really the killers to the season.

just winning 2 and we are top 10 in PWR and 2nd in the league with games in hand

BearLover

Quote from: upprdeckthis 3 losses are really the killers to the season.

just winning 2 and we are top 10 in PWR and 2nd in the league with games in hand
Against Harvard and Princeton we had the better of the play, so us not winning was as much bad luck as anything. On the other hand, by far the most inexcusable game this season was the Colgate game at home. Colgate, a poor team in the first place, was so banged up they could only dress 4 defensemen. And yet, play was even. It was the last game before break, in our rink, and we laid an egg. Awful.

chimpfood

Quote from: upprdeckthis 3 losses are really the killers to the season.

just winning 2 and we are top 10 in PWR and 2nd in the league with games in hand
Its not really fair for us to turn around the results of those games without at least getting rid of the BU win. Sure we outplayed Princeton and harvard pretty significantly but the same can be said for BU vs us.

upprdeck

i didnt think BU outplayed us in a big way.. They out shot us for sure in the 3rd period.

chimpfood

Quote from: upprdecki didnt think BU outplayed us in a big way.. They out shot us for sure in the 3rd period.
I remember someone posted the expected goals for each team on the game thread and it was rough.

Trotsky

Quote from: upprdeckthis 3 losses are really the killers to the season.

just winning 2 and we are top 10 in PWR and 2nd in the league with games in hand
One problem with having a lot of bad teams in conference is it increases the likelihood of a stinker severely punishing us in PWR.

All we can do is play our game the next 14.  As Schafer says in the article: play a faceless opponent. Take care of what we can control and que sera sera.

upprdeck

Quote from: chimpfood
Quote from: upprdecki didnt think BU outplayed us in a big way.. They out shot us for sure in the 3rd period.
I remember someone posted the expected goals for each team on the game thread and it was rough.

I bet if you did that for the ASU game we scored about half the expected goals..  Breakaways and off man rushes and high quality shots are not our strength.

The other reality is that we have really only given up goals a couple games so may expected goals allowed vs us is lower and our expected goals for is lower because we cant shoot.

BearLover

Quote from: chimpfood
Quote from: upprdecki didnt think BU outplayed us in a big way.. They out shot us for sure in the 3rd period.
I remember someone posted the expected goals for each team on the game thread and it was rough.
That was me. It was like 5 for BU to 2 for Cornell, and tbh I thought that was pretty evident from watching the game.

adamw

Quote from: TrotskyThat was, unexpectedly, a good article.  Bravo CHN.

no one accepts kudos, when you preface with "unexpectedly"
College Hockey News: http://www.collegehockeynews.com

Trotsky

Quote from: adamw
Quote from: TrotskyThat was, unexpectedly, a good article.  Bravo CHN.

no one accepts kudos, when you preface with "unexpectedly"



In retrospect, it being by Jane, I am not surprised at all.  She is a fine writer which, in sports journalism, may make her the first ever.