Clarkson vs. Cornell 2/17/23

Started by Iceberg, February 17, 2023, 06:25:15 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Iceberg

Quote from: TrotskyHow???

Poor defensive game. I don't think any of the pairings had a particularly spotless night. And even then, the game was still within reach

Scersk '97

Quote from: TrotskyUgh.  That was on Shane.

Way, way, WAY too many rebounds off the chest.

upprdeck

Not like Clarkson generated a ton of good chances off their shots..

Cornell probably 5+ that really looked they had to go in and stayed out.

Trotsky

Quote from: Iceberg
Quote from: TrotskyHow???

Poor defensive game. I don't think any of the pairings had a particularly spotless night. And even then, the game was still within reach
I didn't mean how did we lose. I watched it, I know how.

I meant how did Bancroft not score.  I watched it, I still don't know how.

Dafatone

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: Iceberg
Quote from: TrotskyHow???

Poor defensive game. I don't think any of the pairings had a particularly spotless night. And even then, the game was still within reach
I didn't mean how did we lose. I watched it, I know how.

I meant how did Bancroft not score.  I watched it, I still don't know how.

I think he got too worried about putting the puck over the goalie's pad (that never even got there) and he basically shot the puck straight up.

Iceberg

Yeah, I'm amazed these rinks don't have overhead cameras. It was damn hard to tell whether or not Bancroft's attempt was actually a goal. It sure looked like the puck hit the top of the net and bounced out.

ugarte

Quote from: IcebergYeah, I'm amazed these rinks don't have overhead cameras. It was damn hard to tell whether or not Bancroft's attempt was actually a goal. It sure looked like the puck hit the top of the net and bounced out.
the net didn't flinch so i have to believe it hit iron. we had a couple that couldn't possibly stay out except they did.

too many rebounds and nobody to clear them. shane is not facing a lot of shots but the shots he faces are high-quality and he's got to smother them, not just stop them. ugly loss.

upprdeck

They do have overhead cameras..  And as we discussed last week where they showed replays that hurt Cornell tonight we didnt see the replays from the over head views.

Maybe it stayed out refs didnt want to go look at a key play in the game, but they wanted to review the .3 on the clock

chimpfood


sah67

Quote from: upprdeckThey do have overhead cameras..  And as we discussed last week where they showed replays that hurt Cornell tonight we didnt see the replays from the over head views.

Maybe it stayed out refs didnt want to go look at a key play in the game, but they wanted to review the .3 on the clock

Schafer didn't even seem that upset/adamant about them reviewing that one, although Andreev was extremely animated, forcing one of the refs to watch the replay on the scoreboard (which they rewound and showed in slow-mo, multiple times) with him during one of the stoppages soon after it happened.

Schafer was more upset about the missed interference call that led directly to the 4th Clarkson goal: he was still on the ref's case about that one during the handshake line.

scoop85

Easy choice as most frustrating loss of the year. Hard to fathom that we didn't get the tying goal on multiple occasions.

And yes, Shane needs to be better.

Trotsky


Trotsky

With all games complete, we stay in 12.

osorojo

Apparently Clarkson has improved a great deal since the beginning of the year.

chimpfood

Well we also lost to them at the beginning of the year so that isn't too comforting