2020-02-28: Cornell 5 St. Lawrence 0

Started by Trotsky, February 28, 2020, 09:33:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

ugarte

Quote from: upprdeckcolgate with the last 2nd tie..  but really colgate outplayed clarkson most of the game and really was unlucky to not get the outright win
also lucky not to lose after giving up a breakaway in OT but they definitely had more of the good chances in the extra period

KenP

I'm torn part of me was hoping Cornell would go into tomorrow with more than pride on the line.  I'm really hoping they don't let up against a dangerous Clarkson team.

Trotsky

I don't think there is any danger of letting up.  The guys are still smarting from losing the final in Placid in 2019.

French Rage

03/23/02: Maine 4, Harvard 3
03/28/03: BU 6, Harvard 4
03/26/04: Maine 5, Harvard 4
03/26/05: UNH 3, Harvard 2
03/25/06: Maine 6, Harvard 1

Trotsky

Mankato losing 1-0 in the 3rd.  North Dakota winning 2-0 in the 2nd.

Trotsky


CU2007

It looks like Brown - Colgate is locked in as the 8-9 series next weekend. Maybe? If so, pretty decent chance we'll play the winner

Trotsky

Quote from: CU2007It looks like Brown - Colgate is locked in as the 8-9 series next weekend. Maybe? If so, pretty decent chance we'll play the winner
As of now, SLU  would play Harvard.

Just sayin'.

Trotsky


ice

Quote from: TrotskyI don't think there is any danger of letting up.  The guys are still smarting from losing the final in Placid in 2019.

They got ripped off.  One of the worst missed calls I have ever seen.

Trotsky

Mankato lost and the bald naked guy who stole the ambulance in Philly has been caught.  These are not related facts, at least at this point.

Swampy

Quote from: osorojoAn "upset" only occurs when someone interprets data to select a "favorite" (a good, honest word) but that someone somehow manages to screw up. In a world where data interpretation was hard science there would be no upsets and no sports fans, only data geeks.

You're mistaking "hard science" for science without uncertainty or fallibility. There's no such thing. In fact, it's probably a contradiction in terms. (But I can't be certain.)


ugarte

Quote from: Swampy
Quote from: osorojoAn "upset" only occurs when someone interprets data to select a "favorite" (a good, honest word) but that someone somehow manages to screw up. In a world where data interpretation was hard science there would be no upsets and no sports fans, only data geeks.

You're mistaking "hard science" for science without uncertainty or fallibility. There's no such thing. In fact, it's probably a contradiction in terms. (But I can't be certain.)
you're mistaking "typing bullshit" for engaging in a discussion. you don't have to respond. I thought we were doing pretty well letting that turd just sit there.