Uniom 2/2/18

Started by Trotsky, January 30, 2018, 07:13:25 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

French Rage

03/23/02: Maine 4, Harvard 3
03/28/03: BU 6, Harvard 4
03/26/04: Maine 5, Harvard 4
03/26/05: UNH 3, Harvard 2
03/25/06: Maine 6, Harvard 1

scoop85

Quote from: French RageWhew!

Definite whew. Now I can obsess about Donaldson's injury

DL

What was the deal with the waved off 4th goal?

ugarte

Quote from: DLWhat was the deal with the waved off 4th goal?
no idea. i've watched the replay like three times and unless cornell entered the zone offsides (i was listening on the radio for the first two periods) i'm at a loss.

Trotsky

Quote from: DLWhat was the deal with the waved off 4th goal?
Traffic in the crease was what I assumed at the time.

ugarte

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: DLWhat was the deal with the waved off 4th goal?
Traffic in the crease was what I assumed at the time.
here are the highlights. only traffic i see is wearing union sweaters https://twitter.com/CornellOnILN/status/959615174289141761

BearLover

Looked great for much of the game but a ton of unforced turnovers. Is the team still sick? What did people make of the Donaldson injury?

DL

Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: DLWhat was the deal with the waved off 4th goal?
Traffic in the crease was what I assumed at the time.
here are the highlights. only traffic i see is wearing union sweaters https://twitter.com/CornellOnILN/status/959615174289141761
Right? Or was it illegal for Locke to basically push the puck-plus-goalie-leg over the line?

JasonN95

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: DLWhat was the deal with the waved off 4th goal?
Traffic in the crease was what I assumed at the time.

I was afraid that the GWG was going to get overturned as it looked like a Cornell player was in the crease as the puck came out and then was shot in.

Is this the best offensive talent a Schafer team has had or am I falling victim to what is new/recent and forgetting a more potent team offensively?

Trotsky

Quote from: JasonN95Is this the best offensive talent a Schafer team has had or am I falling victim to what is new/recent and forgetting a more potent team offensively?
It's up there.

The 2003 and 2010 teams had some real O quality but the system did the "only man to hold Michael Jordan under 30 a night" thing.

The players inherited from Brian in 1996 and 1997 could score.

Here is the ECAC GPG line.  We're running at 3.13 this year.

I'd still say 2010 was a more powerful cast.

upprdeck

crazy game.  as dominant first period as you will ever see..  Union stepped it the 2nd and won all the stick battles, caused some turnovers and got 3 2nd chance goals as Cornell had a tough time clearing the puck out..  yet at the same time Cornell when it got it deep had multiple long extended periods with control and tons of shot and actually outshot Union in the 2nd.  the 3rd was much more Cornells way, Union had a few chances,  Cornell again had extended cycle time missed 3-4 open nets,, and then the last 2 min with the goalie pulled it seemed like union won every draw and had the nice play to a cross ice pass and tough to tell if we made the save or it was shot high.

im not sure that union had more than 1-2 odd man entries into the zone all night, cornell must have had 10-12.

Whatever the waved off goal was Coach was not happy with the answer.

Donaldson looked like Collarbone the way he went off.

upprdeck

Forgot to add, that was a great crowd for non Harvard/Clarkson game, place was full like the old days.. I heard several people who were at their only game of the year talking about going on the road if Cornell gets some place

BearLover

Quote from: JasonN95
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: DLWhat was the deal with the waved off 4th goal?
Traffic in the crease was what I assumed at the time.

I was afraid that the GWG was going to get overturned as it looked like a Cornell player was in the crease as the puck came out and then was shot in.

Is this the best offensive talent a Schafer team has had or am I falling victim to what is new/recent and forgetting a more potent team offensively?
I had the same thought on the GWG.

Re: offensive talent, the 2005 team scored 112 goals and the 2003 team scored 123 [EDIT: tbrw says 133]. The 2010 team had 107 goals against a bit tougher competition. This year's team has 75 goals in 22 games. That's 119 goals over 35 games. Outside of the numbers, it's hard to say from just eyeballing it. Ryan Vesce, Matt Moulson, and Riley Nash probably haven't met their match in the past seven years though.

Trotsky

Quote from: upprdeckForgot to add, that was a great crowd for non Harvard/Clarkson game, place was full like the old days.. I heard several people who were at their only game of the year talking about going on the road if Cornell gets some place
This is how it used to be.  We had so much fun at Lynah that we decided to make the Harvard trip one year, then the next year we figured maybe Colgate was doable... that's how the Faithful was built.  It's the product of hundreds of spontaneous decisions all within the context of having a really fun time watching up tempo (and winning) hockey.

I for one welcome the coming bandwagon.

BearLover

Quote from: upprdeckForgot to add, that was a great crowd for non Harvard/Clarkson game, place was full like the old days.. I heard several people who were at their only game of the year talking about going on the road if Cornell gets some place
That was probably the fullest I've seen Lynah over ILDN in the past few years for a non-Harvard game. Hope the fans had fun