Murray's Penalty/NO GOAL

[HpyGlmore2-05]

1.  What do people think about Dartmouth's goal?  From section B, it looked like 1.  Dartmouth was in the crease.  2. A Darthmouth player's stick was high in the air, and 3. Dartmouth players were obstructing LeNeveu = no goal


2.  What the heck did Doug Murray do to get the 10 min miscondcut?

[Jordan 04]

[q]2. What the heck did Doug Murray do to get the 10 min miscondcut?[/q]

Going a little to far with the argument with Murphy.  Verbal stuff.  Probably said the magic word (more than once...)

[DeltaOne81]

No goal, puck was high in the air, puck was in the net... high sticking all the way. Murphy is blind.

[atb9]

From the fifth row of section E...

High stick.  Forget the interference.  It looked like the puck hit the Dartmouth stick head high.  Ridiculous call and we were chanting "still a shutout" the rest of the game.

[Ben Doyle 03]

IIRC, Murphy's arm was up before the goal so he was intending to call something on us any way. . .it appeared that he was concentrating on that and not on the crap going on in the crease (high stick, crease, and interference). Whatever, a wins a win and Dan Murphy still sucks!

[Dart~Ben]

Wow, and I thought UNH's fans were bitter.

YOU GUYS WON 6 TO FREAKING 1 - you broke an 8 game winless streak. Quit bitching about the damn officials.

[DeltaOne81]

When your goalie's going for a team record number of shutouts, you bitch about the one goal... believe me, if it was the second goal, it'd matter a lot less.

[atb9]

Give me a break, Ben.  Lenny is trying to tie and break Ken Dryden's shutout record.  People in Omaha know who Ken Dryden is, right?

[DeltaOne81]

Okay boys, no need to get feisty... it's a good night :-D.

[Josh '99]

Jordan wrote:

[q]2. What the heck did Doug Murray do to get the 10 min miscondcut?[/q]

Going a little to far with the argument with Murphy.  Verbal stuff.  Probably said the magic word (more than once...)

He also looked like he was about ready to pick Murphy up and break him in half.

[redice]

And how about Trevor Byrne lobbying for a penalty when hats were thrown on the ice for Moulson's hat trick.  At that point in the game, DC was obviously NOT going to win.   Lobbying for a penalty because the home team fans were throwing hats on the ice was pretty poor!   I'm surprised that he wasn't successful.  This officiating crew came on the ice with a bug up their a$$.   Did anyone notice the linesman berating a couple of Dartmouth players for not leaving  the ice fast enough at the conclusion of the pre-game warm-ups?  I think that set the tone for the officials' conduct the whole night.

[Chips \'03]

Err.... Actually, that should have been a penalty. The hats, fine, the bag of skittles, not so fine. That's why it took like, ten minutes to clear 'things' off the ice.

[Ben Doyle 03]

Bill, I too noticed the little conference after warm-ups at the door. . .that linesman was none to pleased with the extra 30-45 seconds of ice time the Dartmouth player took.

[DeltaOne81]

[Q]Err.... Actually, that should have been a penalty. The hats, fine, the bag of skittles, not so fine. That's why it took like, ten minutes to clear 'things' off the ice.[/Q]
The skittles were stupid, and we got a warning for that. Which is why Dmouth thought they could maybe get away with the hats breaking the warning. Luckily, Murphy's been around long enough to realize it's a time honored hockey tradition and competely legit. But, I dunno, if you're DC, you kinda have to try, especially since the warning was issued.

And hey, at least Murphy was better than the RPI ushers ::rolleyes::

[ugarte]

DeltaOne81 '03 wrote:

Luckily, Murphy's been around long enough to realize it's a time honored hockey tradition . . .

So, are you saying that you think that maybe there is a hockey referee who "hasn't been around long enough" to know what a hat trick is?