Post the Ivy Standings

Started by nyc94, January 22, 2003, 02:42:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

nyc94

Could we get the standings posted on this site,  particularly the Ivy standings?  The only place I know to find them is the official Ivy League site which takes an eternity to load on dial up.  Make eLynah one stop shopping.

CowbellGuy

Well, CHDB doesn't keep track of any games that Cornell's not in. Option 1 is to manually update the standings. It'll never get done. Option 2 is to attempt to extract the information from ivyleaguesports.com's page. The minute I get it working, they'll be sure to change their formatting and hose it. Option 3 is to compile scores based on the complete results from collegehockeystats.com. It's the most involved on my end, but it should, hopefully, stay consistent. But Option 3 won't be getting done any time soon.

"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy

rhovorka

In addition, it doesn't even seem that the standings the Ivy League website has up are correct.  I count 3 Harvard Ivy losses (Brown, Cornell, Prince-bwhahaha-ton), and their standings list HU's Ivy record as 4-2.  I don't feel like going through to verify the other records.
http://ivyleaguesports.com/sports/standings.asp?intSID=8
Rich H '96

Keith K

Jonh Whelan has the Ivy standings updated every night at his web site:
http://slack.net/hockey .  They're listed in conjunction with the ECAC stats, so they're not in the right order though.

nyc94

I just thought since it only involved six teams and 30 games over four months that someone could do it manually.  I don't mean a huge compilation of statisitics.  I just want to know the W-L-T pts GF GA of each team.  I know it's out there.  I just want it closer to "home".

CowbellGuy

Nothing done manually ever gets done. I'm almost done with option 3 anyway. Damn you. ::rolleyes::

"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy

gwm3

So "won't be getting done anytime soon" means done within 3 hours? ;-)

jy3

from john whelan's site:

Standings including games of 2003 January 21
# Team ECAC Ivy
               W-L-T PF-PA-PR GB Pct                W-L-T PF-PA-PR Pct

1 Cornell 9-1-0 18-2-24 -- .900                 4-1-0 8-2-10 .800

2 Harvard 11-3-0 22-6-16 -- .786              4-3-0 8-6-6 .571

3 Yale 7-5-0 14-10-20 3 .583                     3-5-0 6-10-4 .375

4 Brown 7-5-1 15-11-18 3 .577                  5-2-0 10-4-6 .714

5 Clarkson 5-4-1 11-9-24 3½ .550

6 Dartmouth 5-5-0 10-10-24 4 .500           3-2-0 6-4-10 .600

7 Union 4-5-2 10-12-22 4½ .455

8 Vermont 4-6-0 8-12-24 5 .400

9 Colgate 3-6-1 7-13-24 5½ .350

St. Lawrence 3-6-1 7-13-24 5½ .350

11 RPI 2-6-2 6-14-24 6 .300

12 Princeton 2-10-0 4-20-20 8 .167           1-7-0 2-14-4 .125

so that is that.
so  CU, Brown, DC, Hahvahd, Yale, PU in win% order

LGR!!!!!!!!!!
jy3 '00

Greg Berge


nyc94

                    W-L-T   Pts    GF   GA
Brown           5-2-0   10     26   17
Cornell          4-1-0     8     21     9
Harvard        4-3-0     8     26    21
Dartmouth   3-2-0     6      17   17
Yale             3-5-0     6       32   34
Princeton     1-7-0     2       11   36


I may have made math errors in my haste but this is what I had in mind.  I used Greg's results.  The Ivy League web site is slow to load and slow to be updated with results.

CowbellGuy

CHDB now has ECAC and Ivy Standings. Click on the "Standings" link at the top, or the Standings link which will appear on the menubar here momentarily. You can sort each by anything listed by clicking on the column name.

"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy

jtwcornell91

Cool.  I was going to make a wisecrack about breaking ties by the ECAC tiebreaking procedure, but you might take it as a challenge and waste more time. ;-)


CowbellGuy

Enough time wasted. Alphabetical it is =P

"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy

DeltaOne81

Well, there also is no tie breaking. Ivy League awards co-champions when it works out that way (right?).

Greg Berge