Polls 1/12

Started by sah67, January 12, 2009, 01:22:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Beeeej

My understanding is that that's not what "bracket integrity" means - it means maintaining the #1 through #4 teams as the top seeds, #5 through #8 as the second seeds, etc.  It's so that nobody is unfairly advantaged or disadvantaged by their matchup just because it would help prevent first-round intraconference games.  So they consider #1 vs. #14 to be proper by this standard (which is what happened to us in 2003), and #4 vs. #16 also would be - but e.g., #1 vs. #12 would not be acceptable, even if #s 13-16 are all in #1's conference.
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

Trotsky

Finish in the top 2 in PWR and it won't matter.

Robb

[quote Beeeej]My understanding is that that's not what "bracket integrity" means - it means maintaining the #1 through #4 teams as the top seeds, #5 through #8 as the second seeds, etc.[/quote]
I think people refer to maintaining the "sum of 17" (1+16, 2+15, etc) as "competitive equity" or something like that.
Let's Go RED!

KeithK

[quote Trotsky]Finish in the top 2 in PWR and it won't matter.[/quote]Amen. Or, as I like to say, just win the next 22 in a row...

Swampy

[quote sah67]http://www.uscho.com/rankings/

We move up to #5 with two first-place votes, and we now have 4 ECAC teams ranked nationally, with Yale cracking the list at #19, Princeton sliding to #10, and Dartmouth falling to #18.

And for those of you who care, we're up to #3 in the oh-so-crucial INCH Power Rankings:
http://insidecollegehockey.com/5Polls/0809/polls_0716.htm[/quote]

It's interesting that the comments for the top 3 teams on INCH all reflect their strong defensive performance.

sah67

[quote Swampy]

It's interesting that the comments for the top 3 teams on INCH all reflect their strong defensive performance.[/quote]

In contrast to USCHO, who, over the weekend, posted a front page headline about Notre Dame being "boring" despite their ridiculous winning streak.  Almost like they had some WCHA-fanboy webmaster for a day or something.

Al DeFlorio

If UHN is host team in Manchester and they make the tournament (almost a given), they will play in Manchester.
Al DeFlorio '65

Josh '99

[quote KeithK][quote Trotsky]Finish in the top 2 in PWR and it won't matter.[/quote]Amen. Or, as I like to say, just win the next 22 in a row...[/quote]Al Davis had the right idea.  Just win, baby.
"They do all kind of just blend together into one giant dildo."
-Ben Rocky 04

Jeff Hopkins '82

[quote Josh '99][quote KeithK][quote Trotsky]Finish in the top 2 in PWR and it won't matter.[/quote]Amen. Or, as I like to say, just win the next 22 in a row...[/quote]Al Davis had the right idea.  Just win, baby.[/quote]

As much as I dislike Al Davis, that saying goes through my head every time we start talking about "What does Cornell have to do to..."::doh::

jnachod

We should make a cheer loosely based on Sarah Palin's rhetoric (drill, baby, drill) .... Win baby Win !

ftyuv

[quote jnachod]We should make a cheer loosely based on Sarah Palin's rhetoric (drill, baby, drill) .... Win baby Win ![/quote]Or show up early enough for the warmup drills, and then you can just chant "drill baby drill" straight up.

mnagowski

QuoteOr show up early enough for the warmup drills, and then you can just chant "drill baby drill" straight up.

Now that's a great idea.
The moniker formally know as metaezra.
http://www.metaezra.com

nyc94

[quote KeithK]Here's my favorite PWR/tournament nightmare.  Cornell finishes strong, returns to the tournament and captures a #1 regional seed. But only being ranked #3 or #4 in the PWR behind a couple of other eastern teams they get shipped to Marriucci against a regional field that includes big ice teams UNH and home team Minnesota.[/quote]

The first bracketology column is up and Cornell ends up in Grand Rapids even as the number two in PWR.  Cornell v. Maine and BC v. Michigan.

Beeeej

[quote nyc94]The first bracketology column is up and Cornell ends up in Grand Rapids even as the number two in PWR.  Cornell v. Maine and BC v. Michigan.[/quote]

[quote USCHO]To be honest, I think Cornell is happier with this arrangement, rather than getting switched with BU, resulting in a UNH-Cornell matchup in Manchester. So we'll stick with this.[/quote]

Really?  We'd be so hell-bent on playing the presumably "weaker" #14 instead of #13 that we'd rather go the 533 miles to Grand Rapids, Michigan instead of 380 miles to the far more Cornell-northeast-alumni-and-student-base-friendly Manchester, NH?!?  Even with Manchester as a de facto home game for UNH?
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

KeithK

[quote nyc94][quote KeithK]Here's my favorite PWR/tournament nightmare.  Cornell finishes strong, returns to the tournament and captures a #1 regional seed. But only being ranked #3 or #4 in the PWR behind a couple of other eastern teams they get shipped to Marriucci against a regional field that includes big ice teams UNH and home team Minnesota.[/quote]

The first bracketology column is up and Cornell ends up in Grand Rapids even as the number two in PWR.  Cornell v. Maine and BC v. Michigan.[/quote]
I'd scream bloody murder if they shipped us west in violation of their "highest seeds closest to home" rule.  But there's a lot moer hockey to be played before we could claim a #2 PWR ranking, so it's not worth worrying about now.