Cornell 6 Quinnipiac 0

Trotsky · January 13, 2006, 08:48:17 PM

One CU player back. 5x4. SOG are 19-19.

Trotsky · January 13, 2006, 08:49:12 PM

Cornell kills off the 5x3 and is 6x6 on pk with under 9 mins to go in the game.

Trotsky · January 13, 2006, 08:54:26 PM

Final, in hoops:

Penn 84 Cornell 44

Trotsky · January 13, 2006, 08:59:26 PM

< 3 mins.

Trotsky · January 13, 2006, 09:01:05 PM

< 1 min.

Trotsky · January 13, 2006, 09:02:54 PM

Q takes a penalty, so Cornell ought to be able to preserve McKee's 17th shutout.

Larry72 · January 13, 2006, 09:04:45 PM

CU 6-0 FINAL!!! LGR

jtwcornell91 · January 13, 2006, 09:07:46 PM

[quote Trotsky]Mark McCutcheon, his 2nd shg of the year, and his 5th goal of the year after having zero through his first two season. Not to spoil anything, but this guy is my odds-on favorite for the TBRW "Career Improvement" Award. He's come out of tall-thin-no-body nowhere to become this year's Iggulden. Incredible.[/quote]

Between McCutcheon and Carefoot, I really like having one SH threat on each PK unit.

Trotsky · January 13, 2006, 09:26:45 PM

[quote jtwcornell]
Between McCutcheon and Carefoot, I really like having one SH threat on each PK unit.[/quote]Yep-per. Hard to overstate how much this particular squad, especially the "middies" (So-Jr), have improved over the course of the season, and in surprising ways. Tightening up the system and taking pressure off the G while also opening up the offense... hey now, I thought only the diamond-encrusted WCHA teams could do that! ::laugh::

This is starting to rival the 95-96 team, as a pleasant surprise. Maybe McKee's soft start was a blessing in disguise, since the rest of the team has responded so well.

Of course, "you're never as good as you look when you win," and P.U. played a great game against 'Gate tonight. A 4-point road weekend would go a long way towards re-establishing Cornell as the premier ECAC program.

ugarte · January 14, 2006, 12:26:05 AM

[quote Trotsky]1 16:14 Cor Moulson 12 (Bitz 11)[/quote]I'm checking in late and didn't listen to the game, so I just need to make sure: shouldn't this have said "PP" or "EN"?

Trotsky · January 14, 2006, 11:58:11 AM

Nope.

jtwcornell91 · January 14, 2006, 12:04:16 PM

[quote Trotsky]Nope.[/quote]

Hi, remember how you get complaints sometimes that you neither reply to the message nor quote it, so that those of us who prefer threaded view have no idea what the hell you're talking about? Well, this is one of those times. :-P

Trotsky · January 14, 2006, 06:38:27 PM

No, the Moulson goal has neither a pp nor an en.

Threaded view is a failed technology. Join us in flat view. Join us...

Al DeFlorio · January 14, 2006, 06:40:28 PM

[quote Trotsky]No, the Moulson goal has neither a pp nor an en.

Threaded view is a failed technology. Join us in flat view. Join us...[/quote]
Some day the flat-view society will be viewed in the same light as the flat-earth society.

ugarte · January 15, 2006, 02:38:11 AM

[quote Al DeFlorio][quote Trotsky]No, the Moulson goal has neither a pp nor an en.

Threaded view is a failed technology. Join us in flat view. Join us...[/quote]
Some day the flat-view society will be viewed in the same light as the flat-earth society.[/quote]Just because you use flat view doesn't mean you can't help out the threaders - all you have to do is hit the quote button.