NCAA Tournament

Started by Jim Hyla, March 24, 2013, 09:49:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Trotsky

Quote from: marty
Quote from: gomestarthis two weeks between regionals and frozen 4 BS is annoying.  total buzzkill from the excitement of last weekend.

What is the reasoning behind the week off?

Let the Super Bowl like media hype rise to a crescendo?   ;)

I thought it was to avoid "competing" with the F4, which is pretty silly.

Scersk '97

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: marty
Quote from: gomestarthis two weeks between regionals and frozen 4 BS is annoying.  total buzzkill from the excitement of last weekend.

What is the reasoning behind the week off?

Let the Super Bowl like media hype rise to a crescendo?   ;)

I thought it was to avoid "competing" with the F4, which is pretty silly.

Makes the tournament a marathon, but it would be pretty easy to slip a best-of-three quarterfinal round into that off week, wouldn't it?

Trotsky

Quote from: Scersk '97
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: marty
Quote from: gomestarthis two weeks between regionals and frozen 4 BS is annoying.  total buzzkill from the excitement of last weekend.

What is the reasoning behind the week off?

Let the Super Bowl like media hype rise to a crescendo?   ;)

I thought it was to avoid "competing" with the F4, which is pretty silly.

Makes the tournament a marathon, but it would be pretty easy to slip a best-of-three quarterfinal round into that off week, wouldn't it?

That would be onerous for the student-athletes.

(Pause for laughter.)

ugarte

Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: martyWhat is the reasoning behind the week off?

I thought it was to avoid "competing" with the F4, which is pretty silly.
This. It is less silly when you consider the NCAA doesn't want to cannibalize itself. It has two high-profile events. There is not-insignificant overlap between the potential audiences, the antipathy to basketball here notwithstanding.

Trotsky

Quote from: ugarte
Quote from: Trotsky
Quote from: martyWhat is the reasoning behind the week off?

I thought it was to avoid "competing" with the F4, which is pretty silly.
This. It is less silly when you consider the NCAA doesn't want to cannibalize itself. It has two high-profile events. There is not-insignificant overlap between the potential audiences, the antipathy to basketball here notwithstanding.
As long as we're never called an "appetizer" to the F4 ever again...