scrivens

[hiphopapotomus]

coach should put in scrivens. He is a solid netminder. He rivals davenport easily. If he were played they would find they have two amazing goaltenders. To bad the coach is an ignorant fool.

[Jim Hyla]

[quote hiphopapotomus]coach should put in scrivens. He is a solid netminder. He rivals davenport easily. If he were played they would find they have two amazing goaltenders. To bad the coach is an ignorant fool.[/quote]Hopefully no one, but I, replies to this.

[las224]

Are you the guy who was standing in front of me yelling "go Scrivens" the entire game? Even when the puck was in the offensive zone?

[ugarte]

The rhymenocerous isn't as controversial a commentator.

[Killer]

Excuse my naiveté, but can anyone explain the rationale behind why Scrivens got the loss for the Saturday game against WSU?  I know he played the vast majority of the game (about 45 minutes), but he came in with a 3-goal deficit, and we never got ahead or even tied it.  In baseball, that loss would have gone to the starter.

[Beeeej]

[quote Killer]Excuse my naiveté, but can anyone explain the rationale behind why Scrivens got the loss for the Saturday game against WSU?  I know he played the vast majority of the game (about 45 minutes), but he came in with a 3-goal deficit, and we never got ahead or even tied it.  In baseball, that loss would have gone to the starter.[/quote]

The goalie to whom the win or loss isn't determined by number of minutes or whether a deficit was overcome or not; it's very simply determined by who was in net when the winning goal was scored.

[jtwcornell91]

[quote Beeeej][quote Killer]Excuse my naiveté, but can anyone explain the rationale behind why Scrivens got the loss for the Saturday game against WSU?  I know he played the vast majority of the game (about 45 minutes), but he came in with a 3-goal deficit, and we never got ahead or even tied it.  In baseball, that loss would have gone to the starter.[/quote]

The goalie to whom the win or loss isn't determined by number of minutes or whether a deficit was overcome or not; it's very simply determined by who was in net when the winning goal was scored.[/quote]

Yeah, it basically comes down to game-winning (GW) vs last lead (LL).  If we lose 5-4, the fifth goal is the game-winner, which is what counts for goalie stats.  In baseball, last lead is the determining factor.

This also means that the GWG for Dartmouth against us was the empty-netter. ::uhoh::

[Beeeej]

[quote jtwcornell91]This also means that the GWG for Dartmouth against us was the empty-netter. ::uhoh::[/quote]

For which Davenport still gets the "credit" for the loss, since there was no goalie substitution.

[nyc94]

[quote jtwcornell91]This also means that the GWG for Dartmouth against us was the empty-netter. ::uhoh::[/quote]

[DeltaOne81]

[quote hiphopapotomus]coach should put in scrivens. He is a solid netminder. He rivals davenport easily. If he were played they would find they have two amazing goaltenders. To bad the coach is an ignorant fool.[/quote]

Thanks for your input, Mrs. Scrivens!

[French Rage]

That freshman really needs to clean up his grammar for his Writing Seminar class.

[ebilmes]

[quote French Rage]That freshman really needs to clean up his grammar for his Writing Seminar class.[/quote]

I take offense to that! Seems more likely to be an IHS student.

[Trigger]

Is no one else dismayed at this person's disrespect toward one of the best coaches in all of college hockey? Schafer recruited Scrivens, so if he is really a bad coach, what does that say about Scrivens' abilities?

[DeltaOne81]

[quote Trigger]Is no one else dismayed at this person's disrespect toward one of the best coaches in all of college hockey? Schafer recruited Scrivens, so if he is really a bad coach, what does that say about Scrivens' abilities?[/quote]

Yeah, its called a troll. Move along.

[French Rage]

This thread already reached it's peak with ugarte's rhymenocerous comment.