Quote from: Trotsky on August 22, 2026, 02:57:37 AMQuote from: stereax on August 22, 2026, 02:22:48 AMDoubled numbers are always acceptable for dmen.
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 22, 2026, 05:16:57 PMQuote from: stereax on August 22, 2026, 02:22:48 AM7 is a dman number which is why I'm annoyed a forward has it.
Two words: Brock Tredway
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 22, 2026, 05:16:57 PMQuote from: stereax on August 22, 2026, 02:22:48 AM7 is a dman number which is why I'm annoyed a forward has it.
Two words: Brock Tredway
Quote from: Trotsky on August 22, 2026, 02:57:37 AMQuote from: stereax on August 22, 2026, 02:22:48 AMDoubled numbers are always acceptable for dmen.
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 06:20:34 PMQuote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 05:57:54 PMQuote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 05:28:42 PMHahahaha. Fair.Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 05:08:28 PMQuote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 04:53:12 PMBro snuck Brady Tkachuk in there 💀Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 01:37:57 PMQuote from: George64 on August 23, 2026, 08:42:36 AM7 is not a forward's number it's a defenseman's number no amount of counterexamples will make me change my mindQuote from: Al DeFlorio on August 23, 2026, 04:51:49 AMQuote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 22, 2026, 05:16:57 PMTwo words: Brock TredwayDoug Ferguson
Doug, Brock - not bad company! But how would a 20-something know?
Let's go pro:
Phil Esposito
Bill Barber
Ted Lindsay
Brady Tkachuk
Rod Gilbert
Rick Martin
Lanny McDonald
Joe Mullen
Red Berenson
I rest my case.
Yep. One for you young bucks.![]()
I still maintain it's a bad look to be under 8 as a forward. And 8 is only acceptable because Ovechkin. I don't particularly like 9 on forwards either ngl. At least it's not 2, like a bunch of the young buck forwards are wearing nowadays. I want to throttle them.
D-men: 2-6, 26-29
Fwds: 7-25
Goalies: 1, 30-35
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 06:20:34 PMQuote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 05:57:54 PMQuote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 05:28:42 PMHahahaha. Fair.Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 05:08:28 PMQuote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 04:53:12 PMBro snuck Brady Tkachuk in there 💀Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 01:37:57 PMQuote from: George64 on August 23, 2026, 08:42:36 AM7 is not a forward's number it's a defenseman's number no amount of counterexamples will make me change my mindQuote from: Al DeFlorio on August 23, 2026, 04:51:49 AMQuote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 22, 2026, 05:16:57 PMTwo words: Brock TredwayDoug Ferguson
Doug, Brock - not bad company! But how would a 20-something know?
Let's go pro:
Phil Esposito
Bill Barber
Ted Lindsay
Brady Tkachuk
Rod Gilbert
Rick Martin
Lanny McDonald
Joe Mullen
Red Berenson
I rest my case.
Yep. One for you young bucks.![]()
I still maintain it's a bad look to be under 8 as a forward. And 8 is only acceptable because Ovechkin. I don't particularly like 9 on forwards either ngl. At least it's not 2, like a bunch of the young buck forwards are wearing nowadays. I want to throttle them.
D-men: 2-6, 26-29
Fwds: 7-25
Goalies: 1, 30-35
Yup. As to 11 for defense, Mr. messier would like a word. As to 7 for defense, see above. The numbers actually have, as in futbol, football, and baseball, historical and positional significance going back to the early days of the game(s). Four for a center-Beleveau, Lecavalier-was shocking. Schaf's approach to uniform numbers was an acknowledgement of and respect for the history.


