Cornell Women 5 Princeton 1
Posted by Towerroad
Cornell Women 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: Towerroad (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: October 31, 2010 10:01AM
On a more positive note the Women are 4-0-0 and take on Mercyhurst on Tues.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/01/2010 07:19PM by Beeeej.
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: nr53 (---.cisco.com)
Date: November 01, 2010 03:11PM
A friend of mine was one of the refs for this game and said Cornell pretty much dominated (though I guess you could see that from the score).
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: Towerroad (---.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
Date: November 01, 2010 04:05PM
With Mercyhurst on Tues and Harvard on Fri we will find out how they fare against ranked competition.
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: KeithK (---.external.lmco.com)
Date: November 01, 2010 05:47PM
Just for clarity, could we get in the habit of putting a tag in the title of threads like this to indicate which team you're talking about? It may be clear to regulars that the women played Princeton and the men played UNH this past weekend, but maybe not to casual fans and certainly not if you're searching through threads a few months from now.
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: ACM (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: November 01, 2010 08:09PM
KeithK
Just for clarity, could we get in the habit of putting a tag in the title of threads like this to indicate which team you're talking about? It may be clear to regulars that the women played Princeton and the men played UNH this past weekend, but maybe not to casual fans and certainly not if you're searching through threads a few months from now.
Maybe it's time to have separate forums for women's hockey and men's hockey.
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: Ronald '09 (---.nwrknj.fios.verizon.net)
Date: November 01, 2010 08:21PM
nr53
A friend of mine was one of the refs for this game and said Cornell pretty much dominated (though I guess you could see that from the score).
I was at the game. I didn't think we played that amazingly. We looked a little sloppy, but we just had so much better ability to skate, stick handle, pass, and shoot than Princeton, we were still able to win 5-1. Rebecca Johnston skated rings around the Princeton players. That said, they'll have to tighten it up a bit in order to win tomorrow. It was really impressive to see Hayley Hughes return after taking a slapshot on her shin and being down on the ice surface for a while.
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.arthritishealthdoctors.com)
Date: November 02, 2010 08:08AM
I like this idea. Age? I thought about a cheerleader smiley, but it didn't seem right.ACM
KeithK
Just for clarity, could we get in the habit of putting a tag in the title of threads like this to indicate which team you're talking about? It may be clear to regulars that the women played Princeton and the men played UNH this past weekend, but maybe not to casual fans and certainly not if you're searching through threads a few months from now.
Maybe it's time to have separate forums for women's hockey and men's hockey.
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: mattj711 (---.jentner.com)
Date: November 02, 2010 08:49AM
Ronald '09
nr53
A friend of mine was one of the refs for this game and said Cornell pretty much dominated (though I guess you could see that from the score).
I was at the game. I didn't think we played that amazingly. We looked a little sloppy, but we just had so much better ability to skate, stick handle, pass, and shoot than Princeton, we were still able to win 5-1. Rebecca Johnston skated rings around the Princeton players. That said, they'll have to tighten it up a bit in order to win tomorrow. It was really impressive to see Hayley Hughes return after taking a slapshot on her shin and being down on the ice surface for a while.
I agree. We have a ton of skill (definitely more than most teams), but there are still some issues that will need to be worked on. I do think we are ahead of where we were at this time last season.
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: Trotsky (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: November 03, 2010 11:52AM
Jim Hyla
I like this idea. Age? I thought about a cheerleader smiley, but it didn't seem right.ACM
KeithK
Just for clarity, could we get in the habit of putting a tag in the title of threads like this to indicate which team you're talking about? It may be clear to regulars that the women played Princeton and the men played UNH this past weekend, but maybe not to casual fans and certainly not if you're searching through threads a few months from now.
Maybe it's time to have separate forums for women's hockey and men's hockey.
for the women
for the men
Pretty simple.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 11/03/2010 11:53AM by Trotsky.
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: Swampy (---.ri.ri.cox.net)
Date: November 05, 2010 12:13AM
Trotsky
Jim Hyla
I like this idea. Age? I thought about a cheerleader smiley, but it didn't seem right.ACM
KeithK
Just for clarity, could we get in the habit of putting a tag in the title of threads like this to indicate which team you're talking about? It may be clear to regulars that the women played Princeton and the men played UNH this past weekend, but maybe not to casual fans and certainly not if you're searching through threads a few months from now.
Maybe it's time to have separate forums for women's hockey and men's hockey.
for the women
for the men
Pretty simple.
Maybe it should be the reverse:
for the women
for the men
Or would that be too heteronormative?
Re: Cornell 5 Princeton 1
Posted by: Trotsky (---.dc.dc.cox.net)
Date: November 05, 2010 10:04AM
Swampy
Trotsky
Jim Hyla
I like this idea. Age? I thought about a cheerleader smiley, but it didn't seem right.ACM
KeithK
Just for clarity, could we get in the habit of putting a tag in the title of threads like this to indicate which team you're talking about? It may be clear to regulars that the women played Princeton and the men played UNH this past weekend, but maybe not to casual fans and certainly not if you're searching through threads a few months from now.
Maybe it's time to have separate forums for women's hockey and men's hockey.
for the women
for the men
Pretty simple.
Maybe it should be the reverse:
for the women
for the men
Or would that be too heteronormative?
Yeah, one is descriptive, the other is prescriptive.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.