Final Four (all games)
Posted by ugarte
Final Four (all games)
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: April 08, 2010 10:01PM
Yawn.
Wisconsin 8, RIT 1 (Final)
BC 3, Miami 0 (Mid 2d)
Wisconsin 8, RIT 1 (Final)
BC 3, Miami 0 (Mid 2d)
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/10/2010 09:46PM by ugarte.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: scoop85 (---.hvc.res.rr.com)
Date: April 08, 2010 10:16PM
ugarte
Yawn.
Wisconsin 8, RIT 1 (Final)
BC 3, Miami 0 (Mid 2d)
Yeah, two brutal games. I thought BC-Miami would be entertaining, but no luck with that
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: April 08, 2010 11:15PM
BC now up 7-1 late.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: scoop85 (173.84.100.---)
Date: April 09, 2010 07:45AM
It was mentioned during the Wisconsin game that the Badgers have something like two number one and three number two draft picks (or vice-versa) among their defensive corps. Food for thought when discussing our ability to compete with the very top programs.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: judy (---.att-inc.com)
Date: April 09, 2010 11:17AM
scoop85
ugarte
Yawn.
Wisconsin 8, RIT 1 (Final)
BC 3, Miami 0 (Mid 2d)
Yeah, two brutal games. I thought BC-Miami would be entertaining, but no luck with that
It was very entertaining to see the mass exodus of fans by the time BC got to goal 5, 6, and 7.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: April 09, 2010 11:34AM
I mentioned on Chat that anyone who wanted to criticize Coach Schafer's style, just had to watch re-runs of the RIT game. Aside from no time, I was going to look up how many draft choices, and their ranking, each league has. Does anyone know if that's easily available somewhere?scoop85
It was mentioned during the Wisconsin game that the Badgers have something like two number one and three number two draft picks (or vice-versa) among their defensive corps. Food for thought when discussing our ability to compete with the very top programs.
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: ursusminor (---.res.east.verizon.net)
Date: April 09, 2010 08:38PM
I have not seen a list, but it wouldn't be hard to click on each roster here [www.collegehockeystats.net] and then just count how many players on each team have NHL abbreviations by their name.Jim Hyla
I mentioned on Chat that anyone who wanted to criticize Coach Schafer's style, just had to watch re-runs of the RIT game. Aside from no time, I was going to look up how many draft choices, and their ranking, each league has. Does anyone know if that's easily available somewhere?scoop85
It was mentioned during the Wisconsin game that the Badgers have something like two number one and three number two draft picks (or vice-versa) among their defensive corps. Food for thought when discussing our ability to compete with the very top programs.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: French Rage (---.packetdesign.com)
Date: April 09, 2010 08:39PM
So we lost 6-2, to a team that lost 6-2, to a team that lost 8-1. If BC beats Wisconsin does that make us the worst team ever?
___________________________
03/23/02: Maine 4, Harvard 3
03/28/03: BU 6, Harvard 4
03/26/04: Maine 5, Harvard 4
03/26/05: UNH 3, Harvard 2
03/25/06: Maine 6, Harvard 1
03/23/02: Maine 4, Harvard 3
03/28/03: BU 6, Harvard 4
03/26/04: Maine 5, Harvard 4
03/26/05: UNH 3, Harvard 2
03/25/06: Maine 6, Harvard 1
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/09/2010 08:40PM by French Rage.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: Tom Lento (---.corp.tfbnw.net)
Date: April 09, 2010 09:40PM
French Rage
So we lost 6-2, to a team that lost 6-2, to a team that lost 8-1. If BC beats Wisconsin does that make us the worst team ever?
I don't know about worst team ever, but it does mean Cornell would lose to BC by at least 16 goals. This is clearly because defensive systems are inferior, and run-and-gun teams like BC are built for national success.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: Jordan 04 (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: April 09, 2010 11:49PM
Tom Lento
French Rage
So we lost 6-2, to a team that lost 6-2, to a team that lost 8-1. If BC beats Wisconsin does that make us the worst team ever?
I don't know about worst team ever, but it does mean Cornell would lose to BC by at least 16 goals. This is clearly because defensive systems are inferior, and run-and-gun teams like BC are built for national success.
We'd probably be able to clutch and grab enough to make it more on the order of a 10 or 12 goal deficit.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: RatushnyFan (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: April 10, 2010 12:01AM
The transitive property can be a real bitch.
Re: Final Four semis
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: April 10, 2010 09:42PM
Well, it doesn't reflect well...French Rage
So we lost 6-2, to a team that lost 6-2, to a team that lost 8-1. If BCbeatshumiliates Wisconsin does that make us the worst team ever?
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: Final Four (all games)
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: April 10, 2010 09:50PM
Great camera work at the end. It is apparently more important to show the despondent Wisconsin players gathering in the puck as the clock ticks off the final few seconds than to change cameras in time to see BC explode off of the bench in celebration.
Congrats to BC. What an amazing decade they've had.
Congrats to BC. What an amazing decade they've had.
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: April 10, 2010 10:13PM
Kudos to Gary Thorne for dinging the ice conditions and (Thorne not Barry Melrose?) saying a title game belongs in a real rink with real ice that won't go bad on you (but it's okay to do this rink on a football / baaseball field as a regular season gimmick). This was before the Wisconsin breakaway early in the third with the score still 1-0 and the puck hopped over the Wisconsin stick.)
Wnen Barry Melrose he dies, you could give him an enema and bury him in a showbox. But while he's a alive, he is so much fun to listen to. He speaks his mind but he's mostl good natured. Plus he did pick Miami and Cornell for the title game.
Three in a row for Eastern teams. After six in a row for the West and something like 13 of the last 20 for the West.
Even after getting clobbered 8-1, RIT must be pretty happy to be there. And Miami must feel like crap. Last minute choke costs them the 2009 title, then blown out this year in the semis.
I guess Steve Donahue does appreciate a winning hockey tradition.
Wnen Barry Melrose he dies, you could give him an enema and bury him in a showbox. But while he's a alive, he is so much fun to listen to. He speaks his mind but he's mostl good natured. Plus he did pick Miami and Cornell for the title game.
Three in a row for Eastern teams. After six in a row for the West and something like 13 of the last 20 for the West.
Even after getting clobbered 8-1, RIT must be pretty happy to be there. And Miami must feel like crap. Last minute choke costs them the 2009 title, then blown out this year in the semis.
I guess Steve Donahue does appreciate a winning hockey tradition.
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: redice (---.sub-75-195-225.myvzw.com)
Date: April 11, 2010 08:24AM
One small thing that I noticed was the number of players at the Frozen Four who would (& did) take backhand shots on goal.
Our players are very hesitant to do that. I've seen so many situations, over the years, where our players will lose a scoring opportunity because they do whatever it takes to shoot with the forehand. Time lost; scoring opportunity lost.
At least two of BC's goals were scored on the backhand last night. Not hard shots. Just quick shots that caught the goalie unprepared. We need to do more of this!!
These guys need to practice the backhand shot. In practice, give em pucks & tell them that they can only shoot on the back hand. They'll get better at it, if they practice.
I don't want to believe that this year's Frozen Four players are just so much better than Cornell's (that they can score freely on the backhand and we rarely try).
Our players are very hesitant to do that. I've seen so many situations, over the years, where our players will lose a scoring opportunity because they do whatever it takes to shoot with the forehand. Time lost; scoring opportunity lost.
At least two of BC's goals were scored on the backhand last night. Not hard shots. Just quick shots that caught the goalie unprepared. We need to do more of this!!
These guys need to practice the backhand shot. In practice, give em pucks & tell them that they can only shoot on the back hand. They'll get better at it, if they practice.
I don't want to believe that this year's Frozen Four players are just so much better than Cornell's (that they can score freely on the backhand and we rarely try).
___________________________
"If a player won't go in the corners, he might as well take up checkers."
-Ned Harkness
"If a player won't go in the corners, he might as well take up checkers."
-Ned Harkness
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: billhoward (---.sub-75-192-214.myvzw.com)
Date: April 12, 2010 09:39AM
Not only were the BC players taking backhand shots on goal, they were taking shots on goal. Both differ from Cornell's style of play that calls for quality SOG. At BC, Blake Gallagher and Topher Scott would be big enough to be the enforcers. Mike Schafer's style of play works for the way he coaches and the players he recruits and maybe for the players he can't recruit, so he turns to teamwork and defense and if it hasn't gotten us a title yet, it's been better than the rest of the ECAC the last decade.redice
One small thing that I noticed was the number of players at the Frozen Four who would (& did) take backhand shots on goal.
Our players are very hesitant to do that. I've seen so many situations, over the years, where our players will lose a scoring opportunity because they do whatever it takes to shoot with the forehand. Time lost; scoring opportunity lost.
At least two of BC's goals were scored on the backhand last night. Not hard shots. Just quick shots that caught the goalie unprepared. We need to do more of this!!
These guys need to practice the backhand shot. In practice, give em pucks & tell them that they can only shoot on the back hand. They'll get better at it, if they practice.
I don't want to believe that this year's Frozen Four players are just so much better than Cornell's (that they can score freely on the backhand and we rarely try).
BC sure was fun to watch. Just as they were two years ago when Gerbe was their sparkplug / fire plug (5-foot-5?).
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.arthritishealthdoctors.com)
Date: April 12, 2010 01:08PM
?????billhoward
Not only were the BC players taking backhand shots on goal, they were taking shots on goal. Both differ from Cornell's style of play that calls for quality SOG. At BC, Blake Gallagher and Topher Scott would be big enough to be the enforcers. Mike Schafer's style of play works for the way he coaches and the players he recruits and maybe for the players he can't recruit, so he turns to teamwork and defense and if it hasn't gotten us a title yet, it's been better than the rest of the ECAC the last decade.redice
One small thing that I noticed was the number of players at the Frozen Four who would (& did) take backhand shots on goal.
Our players are very hesitant to do that. I've seen so many situations, over the years, where our players will lose a scoring opportunity because they do whatever it takes to shoot with the forehand. Time lost; scoring opportunity lost.
At least two of BC's goals were scored on the backhand last night. Not hard shots. Just quick shots that caught the goalie unprepared. We need to do more of this!!
These guys need to practice the backhand shot. In practice, give em pucks & tell them that they can only shoot on the back hand. They'll get better at it, if they practice.
I don't want to believe that this year's Frozen Four players are just so much better than Cornell's (that they can score freely on the backhand and we rarely try).
BC sure was fun to watch. Just as they were two years ago when Gerbe was their sparkplug / fire plug (5-foot-5?).
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: redice (---.sub-75-195-254.myvzw.com)
Date: April 12, 2010 03:59PM
billhoward
Not only were the BC players taking backhand shots on goal, they were taking shots on goal. Both differ from Cornell's style of play that calls for quality SOG. At BC, Blake Gallagher and Topher Scott would be big enough to be the enforcers. Mike Schafer's style of play works for the way he coaches and the players he recruits and maybe for the players he can't recruit, so he turns to teamwork and defense and if it hasn't gotten us a title yet, it's been better than the rest of the ECAC the last decade.redice
One small thing that I noticed was the number of players at the Frozen Four who would (& did) take backhand shots on goal.
Our players are very hesitant to do that. I've seen so many situations, over the years, where our players will lose a scoring opportunity because they do whatever it takes to shoot with the forehand. Time lost; scoring opportunity lost.
At least two of BC's goals were scored on the backhand last night. Not hard shots. Just quick shots that caught the goalie unprepared. We need to do more of this!!
These guys need to practice the backhand shot. In practice, give em pucks & tell them that they can only shoot on the back hand. They'll get better at it, if they practice.
I don't want to believe that this year's Frozen Four players are just so much better than Cornell's (that they can score freely on the backhand and we rarely try).
BC sure was fun to watch. Just as they were two years ago when Gerbe was their sparkplug / fire plug (5-foot-5?).
While your points are valid, I still think that encouraging the use of backhand shots (even if only occasionally) could help the offensive output without any change in style and certainly no decrease in our defensive posture. Think of the scoring opportunities that are not even considered because the player can't get the puck onto his forehand and still have a shot. Those are the missed opportunities that I'm lamenting. It's part of a skill set that I think they need to work on....What could it possibly hurt?
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: Jim Hyla (---.arthritishealthdoctors.com)
Date: April 12, 2010 05:08PM
I think that the problem is not so much a backhand/forehand one, although heaven knows Melrose loved the backhand, but that sometimes a quick shot is better than a hard shot. A wrister may be better than a slap shot. You just catch the goalie out of position.redice
billhoward
Not only were the BC players taking backhand shots on goal, they were taking shots on goal. Both differ from Cornell's style of play that calls for quality SOG. At BC, Blake Gallagher and Topher Scott would be big enough to be the enforcers. Mike Schafer's style of play works for the way he coaches and the players he recruits and maybe for the players he can't recruit, so he turns to teamwork and defense and if it hasn't gotten us a title yet, it's been better than the rest of the ECAC the last decade.redice
One small thing that I noticed was the number of players at the Frozen Four who would (& did) take backhand shots on goal.
Our players are very hesitant to do that. I've seen so many situations, over the years, where our players will lose a scoring opportunity because they do whatever it takes to shoot with the forehand. Time lost; scoring opportunity lost.
At least two of BC's goals were scored on the backhand last night. Not hard shots. Just quick shots that caught the goalie unprepared. We need to do more of this!!
These guys need to practice the backhand shot. In practice, give em pucks & tell them that they can only shoot on the back hand. They'll get better at it, if they practice.
I don't want to believe that this year's Frozen Four players are just so much better than Cornell's (that they can score freely on the backhand and we rarely try).
BC sure was fun to watch. Just as they were two years ago when Gerbe was their sparkplug / fire plug (5-foot-5?).
While your points are valid, I still think that encouraging the use of backhand shots (even if only occasionally) could help the offensive output without any change in style and certainly no decrease in our defensive posture. Think of the scoring opportunities that are not even considered because the player can't get the puck onto his forehand and still have a shot. Those are the missed opportunities that I'm lamenting. It's part of a skill set that I think they need to work on....What could it possibly hurt?
___________________________
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: redice (---.sub-75-236-226.myvzw.com)
Date: April 12, 2010 09:28PM
Jim Hyla
I think that the problem is not so much a backhand/forehand one, although heaven knows Melrose loved the backhand, but that sometimes a quick shot is better than a hard shot. A wrister may be better than a slap shot. You just catch the goalie out of position.redice
billhoward
Not only were the BC players taking backhand shots on goal, they were taking shots on goal. Both differ from Cornell's style of play that calls for quality SOG. At BC, Blake Gallagher and Topher Scott would be big enough to be the enforcers. Mike Schafer's style of play works for the way he coaches and the players he recruits and maybe for the players he can't recruit, so he turns to teamwork and defense and if it hasn't gotten us a title yet, it's been better than the rest of the ECAC the last decade.redice
One small thing that I noticed was the number of players at the Frozen Four who would (& did) take backhand shots on goal.
Our players are very hesitant to do that. I've seen so many situations, over the years, where our players will lose a scoring opportunity because they do whatever it takes to shoot with the forehand. Time lost; scoring opportunity lost.
At least two of BC's goals were scored on the backhand last night. Not hard shots. Just quick shots that caught the goalie unprepared. We need to do more of this!!
These guys need to practice the backhand shot. In practice, give em pucks & tell them that they can only shoot on the back hand. They'll get better at it, if they practice.
I don't want to believe that this year's Frozen Four players are just so much better than Cornell's (that they can score freely on the backhand and we rarely try).
BC sure was fun to watch. Just as they were two years ago when Gerbe was their sparkplug / fire plug (5-foot-5?).
While your points are valid, I still think that encouraging the use of backhand shots (even if only occasionally) could help the offensive output without any change in style and certainly no decrease in our defensive posture. Think of the scoring opportunities that are not even considered because the player can't get the puck onto his forehand and still have a shot. Those are the missed opportunities that I'm lamenting. It's part of a skill set that I think they need to work on....What could it possibly hurt?
You right, Jim. It's not an issue of forehand/backhand. It's just the fact that, rather than take that quick backhand shot, they make some other move (pass it, bring it to the forehand, etc). If that quick shot is a backhand, take it!! That's not happening now....I think they lack confidence in it. Thus, my feeling that they should practice it.
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: mnagowski (---.bflony.fios.verizon.net)
Date: April 13, 2010 06:51PM
Greening gives a nice shout out to the Lynah Faithful who were cheering for him in Detroit:
[www.cornell.edu]
[www.cornell.edu]
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: judy (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: April 13, 2010 07:41PM
mnagowski
Greening gives a nice shout out to the Lynah Faithful who were cheering for him in Detroit:
[www.cornell.edu]
I am really surprised that he heard us. Sound got swallowed in Ford Field.
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: Rita (---.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
Date: April 13, 2010 09:30PM
judy
mnagowski
Greening gives a nice shout out to the Lynah Faithful who were cheering for him in Detroit:
[www.cornell.edu]
I am really surprised that he heard us. Sound got swallowed in Ford Field.
Wow, that was cool that he heard and saw us. I hope the GM and hockey guys in Ottawa watch this link to see what a fantastic person they have drafted. I really hope Colin lands in a good organization that will use and appreciate his talents.
Have I mentioned how much I am going to miss Greening?
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: RichH (12.189.157.---)
Date: April 13, 2010 10:23PM
judy
mnagowski
Greening gives a nice shout out to the Lynah Faithful who were cheering for him in Detroit:
[www.cornell.edu]
I am really surprised that he heard us. Sound got swallowed in Ford Field.
You forgot who you were sitting with.
And it really wasn't that bad for sound, considering the size. Scersk and I did an echo test, and ruled that it wasn't as sound-sucking as we thought.
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: David Harding (---.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
Date: April 13, 2010 11:06PM
He has class. The only other fans he gives any credit to are, you know, the Clarkson fans. Also, note that he has been impressed with how well in sync the Cornell cheers are.mnagowski
Greening gives a nice shout out to the Lynah Faithful who were cheering for him in Detroit:
[www.cornell.edu]
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: judy (---.washdc.fios.verizon.net)
Date: April 13, 2010 11:19PM
RichH
judy
mnagowski
Greening gives a nice shout out to the Lynah Faithful who were cheering for him in Detroit:
[www.cornell.edu]
I am really surprised that he heard us. Sound got swallowed in Ford Field.
You forgot who you were sitting with.
And it really wasn't that bad for sound, considering the size. Scersk and I did an echo test, and ruled that it wasn't as sound-sucking as we thought.
I know you're loud, but it didn't seem like it carried all that far beyond our section.
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: mnagowski (---.cluster-h.websense.net)
Date: April 14, 2010 10:48AM
judy
RichH
judy
mnagowski
Greening gives a nice shout out to the Lynah Faithful who were cheering for him in Detroit:
[www.cornell.edu]
I am really surprised that he heard us. Sound got swallowed in Ford Field.
You forgot who you were sitting with.
And it really wasn't that bad for sound, considering the size. Scersk and I did an echo test, and ruled that it wasn't as sound-sucking as we thought.
I know you're loud, but it didn't seem like it carried all that far beyond our section.
I think we're all forgetting that Colin Greening has super-human hearing to go along with the rest of his super-human self.
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: Roy 82 (128.18.14.---)
Date: April 14, 2010 05:29PM
mnagowski
I think we're all forgetting that Colin Greening has super-human hearing to go along with the rest of his super-human self.
But he also said that the CU pep band was the best so I am not too sure of his hearing.
Re: Final Four (all games) - title game telecast
Posted by: amerks127 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: April 14, 2010 09:12PM
redice
Jim Hyla
I think that the problem is not so much a backhand/forehand one, although heaven knows Melrose loved the backhand, but that sometimes a quick shot is better than a hard shot. A wrister may be better than a slap shot. You just catch the goalie out of position.redice
billhoward
Not only were the BC players taking backhand shots on goal, they were taking shots on goal. Both differ from Cornell's style of play that calls for quality SOG. At BC, Blake Gallagher and Topher Scott would be big enough to be the enforcers. Mike Schafer's style of play works for the way he coaches and the players he recruits and maybe for the players he can't recruit, so he turns to teamwork and defense and if it hasn't gotten us a title yet, it's been better than the rest of the ECAC the last decade.redice
One small thing that I noticed was the number of players at the Frozen Four who would (& did) take backhand shots on goal.
Our players are very hesitant to do that. I've seen so many situations, over the years, where our players will lose a scoring opportunity because they do whatever it takes to shoot with the forehand. Time lost; scoring opportunity lost.
At least two of BC's goals were scored on the backhand last night. Not hard shots. Just quick shots that caught the goalie unprepared. We need to do more of this!!
These guys need to practice the backhand shot. In practice, give em pucks & tell them that they can only shoot on the back hand. They'll get better at it, if they practice.
I don't want to believe that this year's Frozen Four players are just so much better than Cornell's (that they can score freely on the backhand and we rarely try).
BC sure was fun to watch. Just as they were two years ago when Gerbe was their sparkplug / fire plug (5-foot-5?).
While your points are valid, I still think that encouraging the use of backhand shots (even if only occasionally) could help the offensive output without any change in style and certainly no decrease in our defensive posture. Think of the scoring opportunities that are not even considered because the player can't get the puck onto his forehand and still have a shot. Those are the missed opportunities that I'm lamenting. It's part of a skill set that I think they need to work on....What could it possibly hurt?
You right, Jim. It's not an issue of forehand/backhand. It's just the fact that, rather than take that quick backhand shot, they make some other move (pass it, bring it to the forehand, etc). If that quick shot is a backhand, take it!! That's not happening now....I think they lack confidence in it. Thus, my feeling that they should practice it.
For an example of an excellent backhand, check out Pittsburgh's third goal against Ottawa tonight, scored by Craig Adams.
[video.nhl.com]
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/15/2010 01:11PM by amerks127.
Re: Final Four (all games)
Posted by: Anonymous User (117.195.230.---)
Date: April 15, 2010 11:56AM
ok thanks for posting video
Re: Final Four (all games)
Posted by: amerks127 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: April 15, 2010 01:14PM
Iceman778
ok thanks for posting video
Is this you?
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 04/15/2010 01:15PM by amerks127.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.