OT: Goalie masks vs. catcher's masks

Started by Chris 02, March 29, 2004, 01:48:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Chris 02

Anyone else notice that the catcher's mask seems like it's really starting to ressemble a goalie mask?  Are that many catchers getting hurt by errant bats and balls?  I know that they usually wear modified batting helmets in reverse because they frequently get clocked in the hand on some batters' backswings.  The masks look really like hockey masks I think!




Lowell '99

This style of catcher's mask has been around for a number of years.  I believe the first catcher to wear one was Charlie O'Brien (of too many teams to list here).  Some guys don't like them; I know Mike Piazza prefers the face mask/batting helmet combination.  The gimmicky "catcher cam" requires the goalie style mask, so you know Fox loves the new ones.

ugarte

I think Joe Oliver was the first catcher to use a goalie mask.  It isn't an accident.  And catchers get hit in the face with foul tips all the time.  It is a great innovation.

EDIT: Lowell is correct. It was Charlie O'Brien, not Joe Oliver. http://members.tripod.com/bb_catchers/catchers/equip2.htm

RichH

[Q]LowellFrank Wrote:

 This style of catcher's mask has been around for a number of years.  I believe the first catcher to wear one was Charlie O'Brien (of too many teams to list here).  [/Q]

He was playing with Toronto (of course!) when the goalie-style mask made its debut.  September 13, 1996.
http://www.baseballlibrary.com/baseballlibrary/ballplayers/O/OBrien_Charlie.stm


[Q]Some guys don't like them; I know Mike Piazza prefers the face mask/batting helmet combination.  The gimmicky "catcher cam" requires the goalie style mask, so you know Fox loves the new ones. [/Q]
I've seen "catcher cam" used with old-style masks.  Piazza and Ivan Rodriguez have both worn it.  The camera and battery pack get mounted on the "wings" of the iron.  That has to add a substantial amount of weight, so I'm sure they don't like it.

In addition, according to http://www.jacksonsun.com/jaxx/masks20030518.shtml the hockey-style of mask is now required by the National Federation of State High School Associations.

Jeff Hopkins '82

What it comes down to is that the masks are evolving together because of functionality.  Hockey just got there first because the game needs more protection.

JH

KeithK

I don't like the new masks on principle 'cuz I'm a purist!

But seriously, it still looks funny seeing a catcher in a goalie mask, but I guess it's an advance in technology.

One thing that is different about catchers and goalies.  MLB catchers are not allowed to have individualized designs on their masks.  A mask must be painted in team colors and insignia.  When he first got it approved Charlie O'Brien had some sort of design on it but had to have it repainted before he could use it in a game.

Scott Kominkiewicz

The chicken or the egg?  As a kid, I was a baseball catcher and I always wondered why hockey goalies wore those white contoured masks instead of something like a catcher's mask.  Eventually, hockey goalies began using caged masks that resembled catcher's masks instead of those thin pieces of plastic that people now only identify with Jason from the Friday the 13th movies.  Ironically, I think the Soviets were the first to use the catcher-style goalie cages.  What did the goalies wear in "Miracle?"

The following link shows Dryden with a plastic mask.  Meanwhile, baseball catchers were wearing caged masks for nearly 100 years before this.  So, which really came first?

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/si_online/covers/issues/1972/0214.html


David Harding

Remember that  for a long, long time goalies didn't wear any mask.  It was only when they realized that they could stop pucks with their masks and keep playing that they started to become popular.  One of the early ones (who was it?) painted gash with stitches on his contoured mask at each spot he stopped a puck.

ben03

Let's GO Red!!!

dss28

[Q]Scott Kominkiewicz Wrote:
  What did the goalies wear in "Miracle?"
 [/Q]

IIRC, "Jim Craig" was wearing the Jason-style thin piece of plastic mask.

David Harding

[q] I think you are refering to Boston Bruins goalie Gerry Cheevers [/q]

Yes.  Too late at night to dredge it up from my memory and too lazy to dig it up from the web.

Dave \'02

The version that I got from a high school teacher of mine (who, incidentally, used to be a goalie) was that the masks were originally put in place to prevent severity of injury.  For example, if you were hit in the face with a puck it would tear the skin whereas if you were hit while wearing the mask, you would still get a cut, but it would be a straight line type deal that could be easily stitched up as opposed to ripping apart your face

Ack

Some catchers will never give in to the new style (Benito Santiago, for example, who's older than baseball itself) - I probably wouldn't either, being another purist, but I haven't been on that side of the plate in years...guess I could change my mind after a good bruising.

The traditional masks are two-pieces while the hockey-style ones are one piece, that makes a big difference to catchers.

Either way, still part of the tools of ignorance.

Cornell95

It has been a long time since I was in Little League, but from what I remember one of the benefits of the 2 part mask was in being able to remove the mask quickly when chasing down foul tips and pop-ups.  I would imagine that the hockey style mask would be more challenging to remove quickly and also heavier to run with (the old baseball adage was to remove the mask immediately but keep it in your hand until you had moved under the ball, then throw it to the side (if you dropped it right away and the ball tailed or was blown by the wind you might run over it and trip) :-P

Lowell '99

I believe the new catcher's masks are slightly different than goalie masks behind the head making them relatively easier to remove.  When O'Brien debuted his mask, I recall the announcers commenting on how that was an obstacle to be overcome in design.