Cornell 4 Brown 1, 11/14/25

Started by Trotsky, November 12, 2025, 01:11:45 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

chimpfood

We should maul both Brown and Yale on the dot this weekend, both have been bad faceoff teams so far. And, as usual, both look like bad teams. A sweep would be a great result to give us some wiggle room for next week and red hot hockey.

stereax

Quote from: Trotsky on November 13, 2025, 03:26:06 PMIt's so weird that Casey's game notes are written in exactly the same voice as Mike's...




I never got Mike's. Point to Casey.
Law '27, Section C denizen, liveblogging from Lynah!

Trotsky

#17
CHN has TOI.  Our leaders:

25:10 Veilleux
22:46 Stanley
21:10 Fegaras
19:50 Ashton
14:49 Fisher
13:36 O'Brien

21:12 Walsh
19:29 Castagna
17:17 Long
16:49 Kraft
15:12 Ryan
14:43 Major
14:29 Devlin
14:09 DeSantis
13:50 DiGiulian

Veilleux is 8th in all of college hockey; Stanley is 36th. 

Trotsky

CHN has CHIP.  Our leaders:

8.4 Castagna
6.3 DiGiulian
6.0 Veilleux
5.6 Major
4.0 Stanley
3.8 Walsh
3.6 O'Brien
2.9 Fisher
2.7 Ryan
2.7 Ashton

ugarte

Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

Beeeej

Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

Trotsky

Quote from: Beeeej on November 14, 2025, 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)

We're about to piss away Pete's 23.3 career WAR.  Relevance.

Dafatone

Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:58:43 AM
Quote from: Beeeej on November 14, 2025, 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)

We're about to piss away Pete's 23.3 career WAR.  Relevance.

There's a miserable, miserable part of me that says let Pete walk, let Edwin walk, and try to have an under the luxury tax threshold reset year.

ugarte

Quote from: Dafatone on November 14, 2025, 12:01:59 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:58:43 AM
Quote from: Beeeej on November 14, 2025, 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)

We're about to piss away Pete's 23.3 career WAR.  Relevance.

There's a miserable, miserable part of me that says let Pete walk, let Edwin walk, and try to have an under the luxury tax threshold reset year.
mets thread drift... the worst kind

Trotsky

Quote from: Dafatone on November 14, 2025, 12:01:59 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:58:43 AM
Quote from: Beeeej on November 14, 2025, 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)

We're about to piss away Pete's 23.3 career WAR.  Relevance.

There's a miserable, miserable part of me that says let Pete walk, let Edwin walk, and try to have an under the luxury tax threshold reset year.
Learned helplessness.  You and Senate Dems.

I say to your Depression Kitty what I say to them: you never win by losing.

Trotsky

Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 12:14:57 PM
Quote from: Dafatone on November 14, 2025, 12:01:59 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:58:43 AM
Quote from: Beeeej on November 14, 2025, 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)

We're about to piss away Pete's 23.3 career WAR.  Relevance.

There's a miserable, miserable part of me that says let Pete walk, let Edwin walk, and try to have an under the luxury tax threshold reset year.
mets thread drift... the worst kind

You can put up with 6.5 hours.  I have put up with 55 seasons.

RichH

Quote from: Dafatone on November 14, 2025, 12:01:59 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:58:43 AM
Quote from: Beeeej on November 14, 2025, 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)

We're about to piss away Pete's 23.3 career WAR.  Relevance.

There's a miserable, miserable part of me that says let Pete walk, let Edwin walk, and try to have an under the luxury tax threshold reset year.

When/if baseball returns from the 2027 labor stoppage, there will be a different system with different rules.

Dafatone

Quote from: RichH on November 14, 2025, 01:59:24 PM
Quote from: Dafatone on November 14, 2025, 12:01:59 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:58:43 AM
Quote from: Beeeej on November 14, 2025, 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)

We're about to piss away Pete's 23.3 career WAR.  Relevance.

There's a miserable, miserable part of me that says let Pete walk, let Edwin walk, and try to have an under the luxury tax threshold reset year.

When/if baseball returns from the 2027 labor stoppage, there will be a different system with different rules.

This is a fair point.

Dafatone

Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 12:28:34 PM
Quote from: Dafatone on November 14, 2025, 12:01:59 PM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:58:43 AM
Quote from: Beeeej on November 14, 2025, 11:37:11 AM
Quote from: ugarte on November 14, 2025, 11:31:16 AM
Quote from: Trotsky on November 14, 2025, 11:17:00 AMCHN has CHIP. 
I looked it up so you* don't have to: CHIP is a comprehensive-quality stat comparable to baseball's WAR.

* person like me

I still had to look up WAR, though.

(It's not all that relevant to the Mets, you see.)

We're about to piss away Pete's 23.3 career WAR.  Relevance.

There's a miserable, miserable part of me that says let Pete walk, let Edwin walk, and try to have an under the luxury tax threshold reset year.
Learned helplessness.  You and Senate Dems.

I say to your Depression Kitty what I say to them: you never win by losing.

Lol ouch. There is a pretty significant draft and tax penalty benefit to a reset year.

But as Rich H pointed out, who knows what the next CBA looks like.

BearLover

Quote from: chimpfood on November 14, 2025, 12:15:46 AMWe should maul both Brown and Yale on the dot this weekend, both have been bad faceoff teams so far. And, as usual, both look like bad teams. A sweep would be a great result to give us some wiggle room for next week and red hot hockey.
Cornell has looked offensively challenged so far this year (while the defense and goaltending have been solid). Not surprising given we lost 7 of our top 10 scorers from last season. Maybe we can break out offensively this weekend, but Brown and Yale won't be taking any chances defensively. Yale in particular seems to play for a 0-0 tie every time we face them, though maybe their strategy will change with their new coach.