Recruits 2026 and Beyond

Started by BearLover, June 05, 2025, 01:34:48 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

arugula

Quote from: Trotsky on August 22, 2026, 02:57:37 AM
Quote from: stereax on August 22, 2026, 02:22:48 AMDoubled numbers are always acceptable for dmen.


Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 22, 2026, 05:16:57 PM
Quote from: stereax on August 22, 2026, 02:22:48 AM7 is a dman number which is why I'm annoyed a forward has it.

Two words:  Brock Tredway
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 22, 2026, 05:16:57 PM
Quote from: stereax on August 22, 2026, 02:22:48 AM7 is a dman number which is why I'm annoyed a forward has it.

Two words:  Brock Tredway
Quote from: Trotsky on August 22, 2026, 02:57:37 AM
Quote from: stereax on August 22, 2026, 02:22:48 AMDoubled numbers are always acceptable for dmen.


Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 06:20:34 PM
Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 05:57:54 PM
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 05:28:42 PM
Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 05:08:28 PM
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 04:53:12 PM
Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 01:37:57 PM
Quote from: George64 on August 23, 2026, 08:42:36 AM
Quote from: Al DeFlorio on August 23, 2026, 04:51:49 AM
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 22, 2026, 05:16:57 PMTwo words:  Brock Tredway
Doug Ferguson

Doug, Brock - not bad company!  But how would a 20-something know?

7 is not a forward's number it's a defenseman's number no amount of counterexamples will make me change my mind

Let's go pro:

Phil Esposito
Bill Barber
Ted Lindsay
Brady Tkachuk
Rod Gilbert
Rick Martin
Lanny McDonald
Joe Mullen
Red Berenson

I rest my case.
Bro snuck Brady Tkachuk in there 💀

Yep.  One for you young bucks.   8)
Hahahaha. Fair.

I still maintain it's a bad look to be under 8 as a forward. And 8 is only acceptable because Ovechkin. I don't particularly like 9 on forwards either ngl. At least it's not 2, like a bunch of the young buck forwards are wearing nowadays. I want to throttle them.

D-men:      2-6, 26-29
Fwds:       7-25
Goalies:    1, 30-35
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 06:20:34 PM
Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 05:57:54 PM
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 05:28:42 PM
Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 05:08:28 PM
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 23, 2026, 04:53:12 PM
Quote from: stereax on August 23, 2026, 01:37:57 PM
Quote from: George64 on August 23, 2026, 08:42:36 AM
Quote from: Al DeFlorio on August 23, 2026, 04:51:49 AM
Quote from: Jeff Hopkins '82 on August 22, 2026, 05:16:57 PMTwo words:  Brock Tredway
Doug Ferguson

Doug, Brock - not bad company!  But how would a 20-something know?

7 is not a forward's number it's a defenseman's number no amount of counterexamples will make me change my mind

Let's go pro:

Phil Esposito
Bill Barber
Ted Lindsay
Brady Tkachuk
Rod Gilbert
Rick Martin
Lanny McDonald
Joe Mullen
Red Berenson

I rest my case.
Bro snuck Brady Tkachuk in there 💀

Yep.  One for you young bucks.   8)
Hahahaha. Fair.

I still maintain it's a bad look to be under 8 as a forward. And 8 is only acceptable because Ovechkin. I don't particularly like 9 on forwards either ngl. At least it's not 2, like a bunch of the young buck forwards are wearing nowadays. I want to throttle them.

D-men:      2-6, 26-29
Fwds:       7-25
Goalies:    1, 30-35

Yup. As to 11 for defense, Mr. messier would like a word.  As to 7 for defense, see above. The numbers actually have, as in futbol, football, and baseball, historical and positional significance going back to the early days of the game(s).  Four for a center-Beleveau, Lecavalier-was shocking. Schaf's approach to uniform numbers was an acknowledgement of and respect for the history.

ugarte

arguing on the internet is in the grand tradition of the internet but actually caring about uniform numbers is sicko behavior