ECAC 2025

[BearLover]

Ian Shane will be on Hockey on Campus on SiriusXM

https://x.com/HockeyonCampus/status/1854692393171231016

Is there a way to listen online?

[upprdeck]

sure if you have xm

[RichH]

Bruno get their first win at Cheel, scoring with under 1 second on the clock. Clarkson took icing with under 10 seconds to set it up. Worth a watch for the schadenfreude.

[Trotsky]

Bruno get their first win at Cheel, scoring with under 1 second on the clock. Clarkson took icing with under 10 seconds to set it up. Worth a watch for the schadenfreude.

The clip.

[Scersk '97]

Bruno get their first win at Cheel, scoring with under 1 second on the clock. Clarkson took icing with under 10 seconds to set it up. Worth a watch for the schadenfreude.

The clip.

And of course the inevitable, interminable review afterwards when it was obviously a good goal.

[RichH]

Bruno get their first win at Cheel, scoring with under 1 second on the clock. Clarkson took icing with under 10 seconds to set it up. Worth a watch for the schadenfreude.

The clip.

And of course the inevitable, interminable review afterwards when it was obviously a good goal.

Two reviews. One, I guess, was an official's review for interference and then Clarkson challenged for a high stick. The end result was that Brown got a 0.5 second power play and failed to score, adding to their 0% PP.

[Scersk '97]

And of course the inevitable, interminable review afterwards when it was obviously a good goal.

Two reviews. One, I guess, was an official's review for interference and then Clarkson challenged for a high stick. The end result was that Brown got a 0.5 second power play and failed to score, adding to their 0% PP.

I know that I'm an old fuddy-duddy, but maybe all these reviews aren't a good thing?

Saps the joy out of things. I kind of wish that officials would say, more often, "Nah, we're good."

[RichH]

And of course the inevitable, interminable review afterwards when it was obviously a good goal.

Two reviews. One, I guess, was an official's review for interference and then Clarkson challenged for a high stick. The end result was that Brown got a 0.5 second power play and failed to score, adding to their 0% PP.

I know that I'm an old fuddy-duddy, but maybe all these reviews aren't a good thing?

Saps the joy out of things. I kind of wish that officials would say, more often, "Nah, we're good."

Like an 8-minute stoppage in the national semifinal to see if any angle revealed the precise height of a stick thus sapping one team of any gathering momentum?

[Scersk '97]

And of course the inevitable, interminable review afterwards when it was obviously a good goal.

Two reviews. One, I guess, was an official's review for interference and then Clarkson challenged for a high stick. The end result was that Brown got a 0.5 second power play and failed to score, adding to their 0% PP.

I know that I'm an old fuddy-duddy, but maybe all these reviews aren't a good thing?

Saps the joy out of things. I kind of wish that officials would say, more often, "Nah, we're good."

Like an 8-minute stoppage in the national semifinal to see if any angle revealed the precise height of a stick thus sapping one team of any gathering momentum?

That never happened.

[Trotsky]

And of course the inevitable, interminable review afterwards when it was obviously a good goal.

Two reviews. One, I guess, was an official's review for interference and then Clarkson challenged for a high stick. The end result was that Brown got a 0.5 second power play and failed to score, adding to their 0% PP.

I know that I'm an old fuddy-duddy, but maybe all these reviews aren't a good thing?

Saps the joy out of things. I kind of wish that officials would say, more often, "Nah, we're good."

Agreed.

I would go further and not show replays during the game.  You saw it or you didn't. Pay attention.  Be in the moment.

And all noises piped into the stadium to punctuate an event should be silenced. They obscure reality and overlay the same boring wrapper.  We don't watch a game anymore.  We watch something being overprocessed by a machine that also lives partially in our heads.

[marty]

Bruno get their first win at Cheel, scoring with under 1 second on the clock. Clarkson took icing with under 10 seconds to set it up. Worth a watch for the schadenfreude.

The clip.

And of course the inevitable, interminable review afterwards when it was obviously a good goal.

Two reviews. One, I guess, was an official's review for interference and then Clarkson challenged for a high stick. The end result was that Brown got a 0.5 second power play and failed to score, adding to their 0% PP.

I'm wondering if Clarkson can challenge twice on the sequence scoring the goal.

Once for goaltender interference.  Losing their time out.

Then for a high stick taking a penalty when they lost that argument.

Didn't the announcers indicate that Clarkson was down a man for the last half second?

Perpetual emotion.

[Iceberg]

Bruno get their first win at Cheel, scoring with under 1 second on the clock. Clarkson took icing with under 10 seconds to set it up. Worth a watch for the schadenfreude.

First win ever at Cheel? That's nuts considering how long and often they've played each other since Cheel opened. Then again, Yale can never seem to win games against Q, so such occurrences are not out of the realm of possibility in the conference I guess

[CU2007]

Bruno get their first win at Cheel, scoring with under 1 second on the clock. Clarkson took icing with under 10 seconds to set it up. Worth a watch for the schadenfreude.

First win ever at Cheel? That's nuts considering how long and often they've played each other since Cheel opened. Then again, Yale can never seem to win games against Q, so such occurrences are not out of the realm of possibility in the conference I guess

Surely not. First win of the season.

[upprdeck]

I thought when you challenged the entire play can be revieweD?

[marty]

I thought when you challenged the entire play can be revieweD?

That would make sense but...