2019 ECAC 1R

[andyw2100]

Brown possible winning goal under review, likely for a possible offsides; last replay they showed seems to be offsides.

I also thought it looked offside, even though the announcers thought it wasn't. I'd like to see a still image of that one.

[scoop85]

So if SLU wins tomorrow we play Brown, if Dartmouth wins we play Union.

Hard to see SLU winning 2 straight in Hanover, but you never know.

Dartmouth only won the first game 3-2.  SLU's taking the whole "second season" thing literally.

True, but Dartmouth did outshoot them tonight something like 64-20

[BearLover]

So if SLU wins tomorrow we play Brown, if Dartmouth wins we play Union.

Hard to see SLU winning 2 straight in Hanover, but you never know.

Well at this point they only need to win one straight.

[andyw2100]

Brown possible winning goal under review, likely for a possible offsides; last replay they showed seems to be offsides.

I also thought it looked offside, even though the announcers thought it wasn't. I'd like to see a still image of that one.

Check out the attached image. You can just see part of the puck, still not completely across the line. (It's the black dot just below where the player's jersey ends.) The other player is clearly across the line. Very close, but I think Princeton got robbed!

[andyw2100]

Check out the attached image. You can just see part of the puck, still not completely across the line. (It's the black dot just below where the player's jersey ends.) The other player is clearly across the line. Very close, but I think Princeton got robbed!

OK. Now I've made a video:

https://youtu.be/fR9sr5bYs5c

[CU2007]

Brown possible winning goal under review, likely for a possible offsides; last replay they showed seems to be offsides.

I also thought it looked offside, even though the announcers thought it wasn't. I'd like to see a still image of that one.

Check out the attached image. You can just see part of the puck, still not completely across the line. (It's the black dot just below where the player's jersey ends.) The other player is clearly across the line. Very close, but I think Princeton got robbed!

Wow really? Looks very offside. Was this reviewed by the linesman on an iPhone 3?

[imafrshmn]

Although neither camera angle is definitive, the video does prove it's offside when you piece together the two angles. But alas, referees are not expected or supposed to be doing this, right?

[andyw2100]

Although neither camera angle is definitive, the video does prove it's offside when you piece together the two angles. But alas, referees are not expected or supposed to be doing this, right?

It was definitely close. I'm not sure what they are supposed to do, but all four officials spent a good amount of time looking at it. Both Scoop85 and I thought it looked offside from the first replay they showed, and we had only looked at it once at that point, from the first angle.

[imafrshmn]

Sad fact of the day: a reported 585 people witnessed the historically long Princeton-Brown Game 2, which was fewer than attended 4 of the D-III women's games and 2 of the D-III men's games yesterday (NCAA round of . Only 484 attended the women's Hockey East semi of Northeastern at Providence (the host). I guess Providence ain't a hockey town.

[ursusminor]

Sad fact of the day: a reported 585 people witnessed the historically long Princeton-Brown Game 2, which was fewer than attended 4 of the D-III women's games and 2 of the D-III men's games yesterday (NCAA round of . Only 484 attended the women's Hockey East semi of Northeastern at Providence (the host). I guess Providence ain't a hockey town.

Undoubtedly there were even a lot fewer by the end.

[RichH]

Sad fact of the day: a reported 585 people witnessed the historically long Princeton-Brown Game 2, which was fewer than attended 4 of the D-III women's games and 2 of the D-III men's games yesterday (NCAA round of . Only 484 attended the women's Hockey East semi of Northeastern at Providence (the host). I guess Providence ain't a hockey town.

Also, Minnesota ain't a hockey state. :-P

https://bringmethenews.com/minnesota-sports/gopher-hockey-tops-michigan-in-overtime-in-front-of-1800-fans

Check out the panoramic photos contained in that story. For decades now, the attendance for the on-campus sites for the ECAC tournament has been dreadful, Cornell included. I guess the Big Ten is similar?

[upprdeck]

it really depends on the replay system..  if they have multiple camera setups most of them you dont really have to do much since the pictures all stay in step.  now if they have to watch each replay by themselves then they have to use time stamps.  but even in slow mo it looked offsides let alone 2 views at once.

[scoop85]

Although neither camera angle is definitive, the video does prove it's offside when you piece together the two angles. But alas, referees are not expected or supposed to be doing this, right?

It was definitely close. I'm not sure what they are supposed to do, but all four officials spent a good amount of time looking at it. Both Scoop85 and I thought it looked offside from the first replay they showed, and we had only looked at it once at that point, from the first angle.

Personally, I'm not a fan of offsides being reviewable. But since it is, I think the officials missed this one.

[Scersk '97]

Personally, I'm not a fan of offsides being reviewable. But since it is, I think the officials missed this one.

I'd like to think that I'd have the fortitude to continue in such a situation, but I wonder if they just wanted to go home...

[imafrshmn]

Sad fact of the day: a reported 585 people witnessed the historically long Princeton-Brown Game 2, which was fewer than attended 4 of the D-III women's games and 2 of the D-III men's games yesterday (NCAA round of . Only 484 attended the women's Hockey East semi of Northeastern at Providence (the host). I guess Providence ain't a hockey town.

Also, Minnesota ain't a hockey state. :-P

https://bringmethenews.com/minnesota-sports/gopher-hockey-tops-michigan-in-overtime-in-front-of-1800-fans

Check out the panoramic photos contained in that story. For decades now, the attendance for the on-campus sites for the ECAC tournament has been dreadful, Cornell included. I guess the Big Ten is similar?

Wow @ that pic of Mariucci. No doubt that attendance, especially during the conference playoffs, has been waning for years. Do other college sports have this problem? Is it a problem, in terms of financial sustainability? I have no clue about these sort of things. It does suck for the players and the fans who show up—a definite buzz killer. Probably a number of factors (that have no doubt been talked about on ELF ad nauseum).