Quinnipiac QF Game 2

Started by Beeeej, March 10, 2018, 05:52:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

jtwcornell91

I was under the impression that the only thing that counted as a tie like that for selection purposes was if the game were decided by a shootout.

jtwcornell91

Quote from: jtwcornell91I was under the impression that the only thing that counted as a tie like that for selection purposes was if the game were decided by a shootout.
But it's possible it changed and I've been too out of it to realize.

RichH

Quote from: Chris '03Result seems to have moved cornell to 2nd or a complete tie with notre dame at the moment.

Denver's comeback win moves ND ahead 0.5822 to 0.5821 since ND and Denver played h2h.

French Rage

Quote from: TrotskyPrinceton's advance to the ECAC Final Four breaks the 3rd longest drought in the conference (9 seasons).  Clarkson, as hard as this is for we Olds to comprehend, has the second-longest (11), and can break that tomorrow.  RPI is the longest (16).  They aint breaking anything.

I was going to ask if there was a page with the F4 appearance counts by team, but I already found it.  Tip of the hat.
03/23/02: Maine 4, Harvard 3
03/28/03: BU 6, Harvard 4
03/26/04: Maine 5, Harvard 4
03/26/05: UNH 3, Harvard 2
03/25/06: Maine 6, Harvard 1

French Rage

Quote from: TrotskyOur 8th 25-win season, reached 6th fastest.

2005 has the weird fate of occurring only 2 years after 2003.  I think perhaps the 2005 team may have even been better, but occurring so soon after and not reaching the Frozen 4 puts in a bit in 2003's shadow.
03/23/02: Maine 4, Harvard 3
03/28/03: BU 6, Harvard 4
03/26/04: Maine 5, Harvard 4
03/26/05: UNH 3, Harvard 2
03/25/06: Maine 6, Harvard 1

billhoward

Quote from: adamw
Quote from: billhowardBe nice to play Dartmouth Friday or maybe Colgate. But Princeton is okay and the Tigers took out a team who could be trouble for us were we both to reach the final.

Meanwhile, I was checking scores on ECAC site not USCHO. And ECAC has Union getting that third goal in the final minute. Oops, final minute of the second period and never changed it. Had me thinking series was going to 3 games

Use College Hockey News, Bill.
Heh. Who'd know the score better than the people controlling the playoffs? You'd think.

But, yeah, I got burned there and caused some confusion in the eLynah chat. My bad.

Trotsky


Trotsky

Galajda vs Quinnipiac:
  W  2-1  60:00 28 1
  W  1-0  59:58 28 0
  W  9-1  46:10 12 1
  W  2-0  58:28 21 0[hr]4-0 14-2 224:36 89 2 0.53 .978

BMac

Didn't see the '03 team, only heard legends. Was freshman for 04-05, and that's still the best team I've seen. Being undefeated at Lyman will make an impressionable young freshman:
A) a fan for life, and
B) believe that team got robbed by being sent to MN. We shoulda won.

BMac

Phenoooooomenal game. Losing by two, but you could feel they had something special left in them. Barlow went coast to coast, then the two best players score the tying and winning goals.

Too bad they were so gassed the next day :-(

adamw

If it goes past 5:00 of conference tournament OT (or Beanpot, or anything), it's still a win/loss for NCAA purposes.  I think that has always been the case.  But the idea that it counts as a tie is a myth that seems to never die.
College Hockey News: http://www.collegehockeynews.com

marty

Quote from: jtwcornell91I was under the impression that the only thing that counted as a tie like that for selection purposes was if the game were decided by a shootout.

Also the second OT which is played 3 x 3 in the NCHC (I think or is it 4 x 4) would not count as a win if a GWG is scored.  This is followed by a shootout and is accompanied by an annoying point system which I can't begin to pretend to remember - the way that I am pretending to remember what I just typed....
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

Robb

Quote from: TrotskyGalajda vs Quinnipiac:
  W  2-1  60:00 28 1
  W  1-0  59:58 28 0
  W  9-1  46:10 12 1
  W  2-0  58:28 21 0[hr]4-0 14-2 224:36 89 2 0.53 .978
Unreal.  Gave up 1 even strength goal in 4 games and that was all the way back on Nov 3 - our 3rd game of the season, their 6th.  We also went 14/15 on the kill, including 3 majors.   That's 1 ppg against in 39 minutes of PK, so it's really like going 18/19.5 (95%).  Quinnipiac just had no answer for Galajda and the rest of our team defense (it's The System).
Let's Go RED!

JasonN95

Quote from: adamwIf it goes past 5:00 of conference tournament OT (or Beanpot, or anything), it's still a win/loss for NCAA purposes.  I think that has always been the case.  But the idea that it counts as a tie is a myth that seems to never die.

Maybe my memory is playing tricks on me but I recall being at the tournament that Cornell participated in a few times that was played at the Syracuse War Memorial and a game going to OT and they put up five minutes, presumably to be like a "regular" OT game and then putting up the remaining 15 minutes to continue OT when there was still no winner. I guess that wasn't necessary but maybe the coaches wanted it?

marty

Quote from: JasonN95
Quote from: adamwIf it goes past 5:00 of conference tournament OT (or Beanpot, or anything), it's still a win/loss for NCAA purposes.  I think that has always been the case.  But the idea that it counts as a tie is a myth that seems to never die.

Maybe my memory is playing tricks on me but I recall being at the tournament that Cornell participated in a few times that was played at the Syracuse War Memorial and a game going to OT and they put up five minutes, presumably to be like a "regular" OT game and then putting up the remaining 15 minutes to continue OT when there was still no winner. I guess that wasn't necessary but maybe the coaches wanted it?

I've heard of this but never witnessed it.  Was this in the 60s?
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."