Quinnipiac QF

[BearLover]

Could someone please remind me of what would be required for a player (in this case Angello/Vanderlaan) to receive a suspension for a penalty in the prior game?

[ugarte]

Could someone please remind me of what would be required for a player (in this case Angello/Vanderlaan) to receive a suspension for a penalty in the prior game?

throwing a punch, pretty much.

[RichH]

Could someone please remind me of what would be required for a player (in this case Angello/Vanderlaan) to receive a suspension for a penalty in the prior game?

Intent to hurt. Shoving a player on purpose head-first into the boards. Actually, most of the time in this league, if you get a 5-minute major, it's accompanied by a Game DQ, which carries a suspension.  In this game, both majors weren't very malicious in intent.

[Trotsky]

Actually, most of the time in this league, if you get a 5-minute major, it's accompanied by a Game DQ, which carries a suspension.  In this game, both majors weren't very malicious in intent.

I think you mispoke, because the majority (the large majority) of times there is a 5+out the out is a GM not a DQ.  DQs are pretty rare.

Edit: oh unless you mean a 5 major as distinct from a 5 for an infraction which is normally a minor (e.g. boarding).  I haven't detected any pattern in those.

[marty]

Could someone please remind me of what would be required for a player (in this case Angello/Vanderlaan) to receive a suspension for a penalty in the prior game?

Intent to hurt. Shoving a player on purpose head-first into the boards. Actually, most of the time in this league, if you get a 5-minute major, it's accompanied by a Game DQ, which carries a suspension.  In this game, both majors weren't very malicious in intent.

I know this is easy to check stat wise but my memory tells me that there are less 5 minute majors w/ DQs than 5 minute majors w/ game misconduct in the ECAC during recent seasons.

[RichH]

Could someone please remind me of what would be required for a player (in this case Angello/Vanderlaan) to receive a suspension for a penalty in the prior game?

Intent to hurt. Shoving a player on purpose head-first into the boards. Actually, most of the time in this league, if you get a 5-minute major, it's accompanied by a Game DQ, which carries a suspension.  In this game, both majors weren't very malicious in intent.

I know this is easy to check stat wise but my memory tells me that there are less 5 minute majors w/ DQs than 5 minute majors w/ game misconduct in the ECAC during recent seasons.

This could very well be true. During the Saturday game, I proved my time-blindness by thinking the rule where you keep the PP after a delayed-penalty goal went into effect the last two seasons. It was 2011.

Back when the league refs got the directive to crack-down on hits from behind, there were TONS of Game DQs.

I'll go back to thinking that 2000 was "about 10 years ago" now.

[ugarte]

Could someone please remind me of what would be required for a player (in this case Angello/Vanderlaan) to receive a suspension for a penalty in the prior game?

Intent to hurt. Shoving a player on purpose head-first into the boards. Actually, most of the time in this league, if you get a 5-minute major, it's accompanied by a Game DQ, which carries a suspension.  In this game, both majors weren't very malicious in intent.

I know this is easy to check stat wise but my memory tells me that there are less 5 minute majors w/ DQs than 5 minute majors w/ game misconduct in the ECAC during recent seasons.

This could very well be true. During the Saturday game, I proved my time-blindness by thinking the rule where you keep the PP after a delayed-penalty goal went into effect the last two seasons. It was 2011.

FWIW Grady also didn't seem to remember that the team keeps the power play.