at Brown 2/27

[Dafatone]

If it's any kinda-sorta-consolation, one of the contingencies for us to control our destiny for that 4th seed in tomorrow's game was that Colgate and Yale not tie.

They tied.

[Johnny 5]

http://i159.photobucket.com/albums/t147/Coelacanth64/Mobile%20Uploads/CU%20non-goal%20Brown%202_27_15.jpg

If that's GTI, I'm Elmer Fudd!?

::bang::

[dbilmes]

Unbelievable! And I was at Quinnipiac earlier this season when Schafer wanted a review on their game-winning goal late in the third period of a 1-0 game, and the refs refused to review it. Now this goal gets reviewed and gets overturned. It's ridiculous.

[Jim Hyla]

From another excellent recap, I assume from Brandon Thomas, this interesting fact:

Cornell hasn't rallied from three down to win in at least 15 years.

The recap can be found on CornellBigRed.com or the ECAC site.

I need to again thank Brandon for his writing. He was excellent at the IJ and it's carried over to Cornell. He always has a report on Cornell games, even though other schools skip it. Brown has nothing on the ECAC site. Thanks Brandon and keep up the good work.

Edit: I take back about Brown not having a recap. I now see a link to it on the Cornell recap page. Why the ECAC doesn't put the link on the home page is beyond me, they used to do that.

[billhoward]

Just watched the video cold before reading any of the comments.  I have NO idea why the goal was disallowed!

Is it possible the referees saw an overhead view and concluded the Brown contact with Cornell wasn't why Cornell collided with the goaltender? Not saying I believe this, but that might explain the referee's action.

Watching this is start=stop-slow motion, it looked as if it was the fourth stab at the puck that got Cornell the goal. That was good effort by Cornell.

[upprdeck]

once you have contact its hard to rule anything after that and you can see him try to avoid and go down under the contact.

also hard to undertand how the early replay of the contact on stewart is not called.

[Scersk '97]

If you watch closely, Hilbrich ends up standing on Ernst's stick, which the goalie lost on the initial poke check. Ernst, rather than play the puck, spent much of the flurry grabbing for his stick.

Not Hilbrich's fault where he's standing, since Tegtmeyer is draped all over him, and also not Hilbrich's fault that the goalie is too attached to his stick to realize that he should play the puck. I still can't get over what a horrible, horrible call that was.

[upprdeck]

really wish they would post the reasoning behind the reviews and the changes.. did the announce it at the rink?  i assume goalie interference was the call not just being in the crease.

[upprdeck]

too bad we play a sport with no real press to question decisions and a league that doesnt bother to explain calls.

[Jim Hyla]

I've been listening to Colgate-Brown and the announcers mentioned that Brown was lucky to get the call that they did. Last night they immediately called it as goalie intereference, but they must have changed their mind after watching the replay.

[scoop85]

I've been listening to Colgate-Brown and the announcers mentioned that Brown was lucky to get the call that they did. Last night they immediately called it as goalie intereference, but they must have changed their mind after watching the replay.

And they gave Schafer all kinds of crap for protesting the call

[Jim Hyla]

I've been listening to Colgate-Brown and the announcers mentioned that Brown was lucky to get the call that they did. Last night they immediately called it as goalie intereference, but they must have changed their mind after watching the replay.

And they gave Schafer all kinds of crap for protesting the call

I think they gave him crap for throwing papers at the ref. I'd give him crap for that as well.

[Trotsky]

I've been listening to Colgate-Brown and the announcers mentioned that Brown was lucky to get the call that they did. Last night they immediately called it as goalie intereference, but they must have changed their mind after watching the replay.

They did.  They said after reviewing at least one other angle that Hilbrich had been forced into the crease by Tegtmeyer.  They were very surprised when the goal was waved off.

I actually thought that in general the Brown announcers were extremely fair throughout the game, and quite complimentary of Cornell.  They were critical of Mike for exploding, sure, but that's to be expected.  If anything I thought they were VERY harsh on Brown, at several points saying it was only a matter of time until Cornell won, and saying at the wrap-up that Brown stole a point from us and we deserved the win.

[upprdeck]

hearing coach say that they ruled there was no contact is hard to fathom?

[upprdeck]

sounds like even the first goal shoudltn have counted after review.  even though the ecac repots says it was tipped that doesnt matter if the initial contact of the puck is a kick.. no differen than a handpass cant go in.