Halloween: Cornell 1 UNO 1 (ot)

Started by Trotsky, October 31, 2014, 07:00:33 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Trotsky

Sections empty during lineups.  That's poor, Ithacans; that's poor.

DisplacedCornellian

1-1 tie...not a bad result against a quick team that has played quite a bit more hockey than the Red at this point.

What happened to Ryan?  Didn't seem like he was out there at all during the 3rd period or during overtime.::uhoh::

Johnny 5

Quote from: TrotskySections empty during lineups.  That's poor, Ithacans; that's poor.

Sections empty during the entire game; student section included.
Maybe they were all out Halloweening? Playing X-Box? Watching Netflix??
Dunno. But, I never thought I'd see the day.

They missed a great game, the tie notwithstanding.
If coach can convince Mitch to stop playing forward they may have a respectable season?!

Tonight should be interesting. Omahaha is no laughing matter.

::banana::
Cure for cancer? Soon. Cure for stupid? Never. ~ Prof. B. Honeydew

buttercup

Game scheduled on Halloween - any fans with kids were out.  That's why we weren't there - but our tickets were used.  I thought scheduling a game on Halloween wasn't a recipe for a full rink when I first saw it.

redice

Considering the speed & offensive skills that UNO brings to the ice, I thought CU did well to hold fhem to a mere one goal allowed......And, their goalie Massa is a stud.    Getting one by him may be a considerable accomplishment...    Moral:    I think we'll be lucky to beat them tonight.    I was very impressed with their team.....   It's still early for CU.     If these games were played in Jan., when Cornell is hitting their stride, we could sweep.     Tonight, I'm nervous.......
"If a player won't go in the corners, he might as well take up checkers."

-Ned Harkness

andyw2100

Omaha definitely had their chances, but the one goal they did score was kind of a flukey goal. One of our guys (I don't recall who) fanned on a shot from near the blue line resulting in a 2 on 1 the other way.

Dafatone

What happened on that goal that was discounted for us?  I think Massa's mask came off?  Sounded like he had mask issues all night.

andyw2100

Quote from: DafatoneWhat happened on that goal that was discounted for us?  I think Massa's mask came off?  Sounded like he had mask issues all night.

I'm not certain, but I think a Cornell player interfered with Massa while he was playing the puck, resulting in the goal. My thoughts, while they were reviewing the goal, were "I hope what I think I saw isn't viewable on the tape." I guess it was.

RichH

Quote from: andyw2100
Quote from: DafatoneWhat happened on that goal that was discounted for us?  I think Massa's mask came off?  Sounded like he had mask issues all night.

I'm not certain, but I think a Cornell player interfered with Massa while he was playing the puck, resulting in the goal. My thoughts, while they were reviewing the goal, were "I hope what I think I saw isn't viewable on the tape." I guess it was.

Brandon Thomas was cited on the broadcast that it was disallowed because of the mask coming off. That = an immediate whistle by the rules.

https://twitter.com/bt_unassisted/status/528347989928984576

andyw2100

Quote from: RichHBrandon Thomas was cited on the broadcast that it was disallowed because of the mask coming off. That = an immediate whistle by the rules.

https://twitter.com/bt_unassisted/status/528347989928984576

I guess this could be the case, but if that were true, why the review? The ref would know if he blew the whistle before the puck crossed the goal line or not, or more to the point, if he intended to blow the whistle before the puck crossed the goal line. I'd like to hear more.

Bahnstorm

Even more disturbing was the number of students who left at the end of the third because they had "parties to go to" WTH? 5 minutes of OT hockey is really going to throw off your drinking that much?

Quote from: TrotskySections empty during lineups.  That's poor, Ithacans; that's poor.

Jim Hyla

Quote from: RichH
Quote from: andyw2100
Quote from: DafatoneWhat happened on that goal that was discounted for us?  I think Massa's mask came off?  Sounded like he had mask issues all night.

I'm not certain, but I think a Cornell player interfered with Massa while he was playing the puck, resulting in the goal. My thoughts, while they were reviewing the goal, were "I hope what I think I saw isn't viewable on the tape." I guess it was.

Brandon Thomas was cited on the broadcast that it was disallowed because of the mask coming off. That = an immediate whistle by the rules.

https://twitter.com/bt_unassisted/status/528347989928984576

And you hope they look at that rule. Yes, there should the an immediate whistle to stop play when the helmet comes off. However when they review the play, they could make the determination that the helmet coming off had no impact upon the goal, thus allowing the goal. It's one thing if because the goalie's helmet came off, he couldn't make the play, or his helmet comes off without a whistle, and play continues before the goal is scored.   It's a completely different thing if the helmet coming off is incidental to the goal being scored, which I think is what happened this time. I'm going to review the video, just for the fun of it.

And his helmet came off with regularity throughout the game.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

Jim Hyla

Quote from: andyw2100
Quote from: RichHBrandon Thomas was cited on the broadcast that it was disallowed because of the mask coming off. That = an immediate whistle by the rules.

https://twitter.com/bt_unassisted/status/528347989928984576

I guess this could be the case, but if that were true, why the review? The ref would know if he blew the whistle before the puck crossed the goal line or not, or more to the point, if he intended to blow the whistle before the puck crossed the goal line. I'd like to hear more.

I don't think he blew the whistle. They went to review after the goalie protested.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

imafrshmn

Coach Schafer had some unusually pointed comments last night, calling out the leadership for "talking the talk, but not walking the walk" as far as sticking to the gameplan, staying within systems, taking care of the puck, etc. http://youtu.be/l7ndMJ89hoQ
class of '09

Dafatone

Quote from: Jim Hyla
Quote from: RichH
Quote from: andyw2100
Quote from: DafatoneWhat happened on that goal that was discounted for us?  I think Massa's mask came off?  Sounded like he had mask issues all night.

I'm not certain, but I think a Cornell player interfered with Massa while he was playing the puck, resulting in the goal. My thoughts, while they were reviewing the goal, were "I hope what I think I saw isn't viewable on the tape." I guess it was.

Brandon Thomas was cited on the broadcast that it was disallowed because of the mask coming off. That = an immediate whistle by the rules.

https://twitter.com/bt_unassisted/status/528347989928984576

And you hope they look at that rule. Yes, there should the an immediate whistle to stop play when the helmet comes off. However when they review the play, they could make the determination that the helmet coming off had no impact upon the goal, thus allowing the goal. It's one thing if because the goalie's helmet came off, he couldn't make the play, or his helmet comes off without a whistle, and play continues before the goal is scored.   It's a completely different thing if the helmet coming off is incidental to the goal being scored, which I think is what happened this time. I'm going to review the video, just for the fun of it.

And his helmet came off with regularity throughout the game.

I kinda understand the necessity of losing a helmet being an automatic stop.  But could UNO be hit with a delay of game if Massa's helmet continues to pop off every eight seconds?