Other Scores -- Saturday 12/5

[Trotsky]

Early games have reached the third period:

Colgate 4 RPI 3 (on UStream)
Yale 3 Princeton 1

Women's game in the second period:

Cornell 1 Brown 0 (Redcast link fails)

[Lauren '06]

Now 5-3 Colgate with two minutes to go.

EDIT: RPI loses it 5-3 after taking a penalty with 29 seconds to go.

[Trotsky]

Colgate wins.

[Trotsky]

According to a poster on USCHO, the women won 5-0 and outshot Brown 40-8.

[Trotsky]

Yale beats Princeton 4-1.  The Tigers are 3-7-1, 2-6-1 and may have officially returned to accustomed suckitude.  Yale is 7-3-2, 4-1-2 and 3-0 in the Ivies.

[releck97]

Brown beats Q 2-1.

[releck97]

St. Lawrence 4  Clarkson 3 - Final

[imafrshmn]

Updated ECAC standings (by winning pct.):

1. Quinnipiac .778 7-2-0
2. Union .750 3-0-3
3. Cornell .722 6-2-1
4. Yale .714 4-1-2
5. Colgate .611 5-3-1
6. St. Lawrence .563 4-3-1
7. RPI .500 3-3-0
8. Brown .438 3-4-1
9. Princeton .278 2-6-1
T10. Clarkson .250 1-5-2
T10. Harvard .250 1-5-2
12. Dartmouth .143 1-6-0

(By Points)
1. Quinnipiac 14
2. Cornell 13
3. Colgate 11
4. Yale 10
T5. Union 9
T5. St. Lawrence 9
7. Brown 7
8. RPI 6
9. Princeton 5
T10. Clarkson 4
T10. Harvard 4
12. Dartmouth 2

[Jeff Hopkins '82]

Wow.  What's up with Brown?

[Jim Hyla]

Wow.  What's up with Brown?

I think they lost someone who wasn't important.

[lynah80]

... on the road.

[lynah80]

...but they were playing Denver.  They have 2 against St. Cloud before they meet Cornell.  Wins against CC and ND (in January) will be important for Cornell in Pairwise.  Yale and Colgate can help too if they knock off Ferris St. and Notre Dame, respectively.

[Jim Hyla]

...but they were playing Denver.  They have 2 against St. Cloud before they meet Cornell.  Wins against CC and ND (in January) will be important for Cornell in Pairwise.  Yale and Colgate can help too if they knock off Ferris St. and Notre Dame, respectively.

As an aside, changing the title of the thread, when that is part of your message, makes it difficult to read and understand your point. Wouldn't it have been just as easy to start your message: 1 point weekend for CC but they were...

I know you had (...) before the message, but initially I thought that referred to another message, not your title. Maybe just me, but it would have been easier. Thanks.

[judy]

...but they were playing Denver.  They have 2 against St. Cloud before they meet Cornell.  Wins against CC and ND (in January) will be important for Cornell in Pairwise.  Yale and Colgate can help too if they knock off Ferris St. and Notre Dame, respectively.

As an aside, changing the title of the thread, when that is part of your message, makes it difficult to read and understand your point. Wouldn't it have been just as easy to start your message: 1 point weekend for CC but they were...

I know you had (...) before the message, but initially I thought that referred to another message, not your title. Maybe just me, but it would have been easier. Thanks.

Thanks! Those message made absolutely no sense to me until I read this since I read this board in flat view and COMPLETELY ignore any thread titles, except for the title of the initial post.

[Trotsky]

Thanks! Those message made absolutely no sense to me until I read this since I read this board in flat view and COMPLETELY ignore any thread titles, except for the title of the initial post.

Same here.  It's also why responses should always quote, since in flat they're usually out of order.