Cornell 4 at Colgate 1 Post-game Thread

Started by sah67, November 13, 2008, 10:00:10 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

marty

[quote Beeeej][quote Give My Regards][quote Beeeej][quote RichH]For regular season streaks, BC's Schnieder had 242:19. The record for a regular season shutout streak is BC's Clemmensen 254:23.[/quote]

I must be missing something.  What's the distinction between the two?[/quote]

Um... Clemmensen's is a regular-season record, and Schneider's isn't.  I assume Schneider's is being mentioned because it was more recent (2006).[/quote]

So why does it say "For regular season streaks" before Schneider's?  That's the only reason I asked.  It sounded to me like they're both regular season streaks, and so one would have to be the record while the other is not.[/quote]

The difference might be due to "shutout" but if so, the Gazette could have explained it.  Maybe they had to fit another Fucillo Hyundai ad on the page and there wasn't any more room for something trivial like hockey.
"When we came off, [Bitz] said, 'Thank God you scored that goal,'" Moulson said. "He would've killed me if I didn't."

RichH

[quote Beeeej][quote Give My Regards][quote Beeeej][quote RichH]For regular season streaks, BC's Schnieder had 242:19. The record for a regular season shutout streak is BC's Clemmensen 254:23.[/quote]

I must be missing something.  What's the distinction between the two?[/quote]

Um... Clemmensen's is a regular-season record, and Schneider's isn't.  I assume Schneider's is being mentioned because it was more recent (2006).[/quote]

So why does it say "For regular season streaks" before Schneider's?  That's the only reason I asked.  It sounded to me like they're both regular season streaks, and so one would have to be the record while the other is not.[/quote]

Holy fuck!  

Because I used poor sentence structure! Is that what you want me to say, Beeeej Noonan?  Woe is me upon the eLynah Forum to have made such an egregious non-sequitur!  May I be cast into the pit of Palin-English!  :-)  Seriously, Beeeej...I don't understand your confusion.  Give My Regards got it right.

All I was doing was listing other NCAA streaks surpassing Dekanich's ECAC mark.  I typed the way my mind was thinking whilst reading a USCHO report about Schneider's streak which also mentioned Clemmensen's.  They are both regular season streaks, as was Ryan Miller's.  I used the words "For regular season streaks" to set up the punchline of Lacher's playoff streak.  Technically, Scrivens's streak is not a regular season streak, since it began in the ECAC Tournament (Conso vs. Colgate).  I see nothing wrong with my paragraph.

RichH

[quote Ronald '09]Is 160:59 the official number to start the season?  On the surface it seems to me not to include the 5 minute overtime.  Or is that made up by Ben's leaving the ice on delayed penalty calls?[/quote]

Ah, great catch, Ronald.  My own math neglected to add the 5:00 OT!  Somehow I thought 1 Shutout = 60 minutes, which was my mistake.

165:59.

:-)

Rita

[quote RichH][quote amerks127]Not sure if this was mentioned but Scrivens' shutout streak lasted 206:44, passing Cropper's record of 189:45.[/quote]

Yeah, in the game thread.  It ranks #2 all-time for ECAC streaks to Colgate's Mark Dekanich's 217:16 set this past February.  Scrivens missed that mark by 10:32.



For regular season streaks, BC's Schnieder had 242:19. The record for a regular season shutout streak is BC's Clemmensen 254:23.  MSU's Ryan Miller had one at 229:29, but the all-time record (playoffs included) was a ridiculous 375:01 — Blaine Lacher for Lake Superior St., Feb. 26-March 2, 1994.

[/quote]

Well, speaking of the (New Jersey) Devil, he had a shut out going for a whole 9 minutes and 52 seconds tonight, until Laich capitalized for Washington.  Clemmensen got another shut out streak going, but alas after ~ 28 minutes that too came to an end. **]

Beeeej

[quote RichH][quote Beeeej][quote Give My Regards][quote Beeeej][quote RichH]For regular season streaks, BC's Schnieder had 242:19. The record for a regular season shutout streak is BC's Clemmensen 254:23.[/quote]

I must be missing something.  What's the distinction between the two?[/quote]

Um... Clemmensen's is a regular-season record, and Schneider's isn't.  I assume Schneider's is being mentioned because it was more recent (2006).[/quote]

So why does it say "For regular season streaks" before Schneider's?  That's the only reason I asked.  It sounded to me like they're both regular season streaks, and so one would have to be the record while the other is not.[/quote]

Holy fuck!  

Because I used poor sentence structure! Is that what you want me to say, Beeeej Noonan?  Woe is me upon the eLynah Forum to have made such an egregious non-sequitur!  May I be cast into the pit of Palin-English!  :-)  Seriously, Beeeej...I don't understand your confusion.  Give My Regards got it right.[/quote]

From the context of your post, and the discussion everyone else was having, it sounded like you were talking only about record streaks, and so the mention of one other streak that clearly couldn't be a record because of the very next streak mentioned left me wondering why it was in there.  I wasn't picking on your grammar, I was asking a simple question.  Lighten the hell up.
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

RichH

[quote Beeeej] Lighten the hell up.[/quote]

Chill, I wasn't really upset.  There's a smiley in there.  :-)  Sounds like beer needs to be consumed the next time I see you.  :-)

Jim Hyla

[quote Beeeej][quote RichH][quote Beeeej][quote Give My Regards][quote Beeeej][quote RichH]For regular season streaks, BC's Schnieder had 242:19. The record for a regular season shutout streak is BC's Clemmensen 254:23.[/quote]

I must be missing something.  What's the distinction between the two?[/quote]

Um... Clemmensen's is a regular-season record, and Schneider's isn't.  I assume Schneider's is being mentioned because it was more recent (2006).[/quote]

So why does it say "For regular season streaks" before Schneider's?  That's the only reason I asked.  It sounded to me like they're both regular season streaks, and so one would have to be the record while the other is not.[/quote]

Holy fuck!  

Because I used poor sentence structure! Is that what you want me to say, Beeeej Noonan?  Woe is me upon the eLynah Forum to have made such an egregious non-sequitur!  May I be cast into the pit of Palin-English!  :-)  Seriously, Beeeej...I don't understand your confusion.  Give My Regards got it right.[/quote]

From the context of your post, and the discussion everyone else was having, it sounded like you were talking only about record streaks, and so the mention of one other streak that clearly couldn't be a record because of the very next streak mentioned left me wondering why it was in there.  I wasn't picking on your grammar, I was asking a simple question.  Lighten the hell up.[/quote]

Why doesn't everybody lighten up. Look this was a simple misunderstanding of intent. God, if you guys had guns we might have a duel. On second thought that might not be a bad idea.::starwars::

But I really think that ::drunk:: is better than ::asshole::
There's hockey tonight and maybe Scriven's can start another streak, record or not.::banana:: We've already ::smashfreak:: this ::deadhorse::.

So before someone ::moon::s someone else over this, let's stop ::fight::.I'm tired of::bang::.

As the crowd said when Colgate took forever to clean up those Big Red gum packages, LET'S PLAY HOCKEY and by the way how many Colgate toothpaste boxes will there be tonight?

See ya, back to my ::coffee::.
"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

Beeeej

[quote RichH][quote Beeeej] Lighten the hell up.[/quote]

Chill, I wasn't really upset.  There's a smiley in there.  :-)  Sounds like beer needs to be consumed the next time I see you.  :-)[/quote]

I can't argue with that.

By the way - "Beeeej Noonan"?  :-D
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

ugarte

[quote Jim Hyla] We've already ::smashfreak:: this ::deadhorse::.[/quote]
THAT'S REDUNDANT!

imafrshmn

CHN's injury report lists Mugford's injury as "back" and status as "questionable for Nov. 15 game".  I think everyone who was at the game would agree that it was clearly not a back injury.  I hope the bit about his status is accurate though.  He's been one of our best players this year.  Get well Muggy.
class of '09

TimV

Ten smileys!  Is that a record?  For one continuous post (regular season, not including playoffs...)?
"Yo Paulie - I don't see no crowd gathering 'round you neither."

Tom Lento

[quote RichH]Sounds like beer needs to be consumed the next time I see you.  :-)[/quote]

How is this different from normal Cornell Hockey gatherings?