[OT] Hobey Voting

Started by ithacat, December 13, 2005, 08:24:17 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ithacat

The nomination phase is open. Pioneers and Badgers are off and skating...

http://www.hobeybaker.com/vote/guest_welcome.php

dbilmes

Moulson the current CU leader with 6. McKee and Scott with 5.

calgARI '07

I'm gonna vote for Moulson who has zero even strength goals.

redhair34

[Q]dbilmes Wrote:

 Moulson the current CU leader with 6. McKee and Scott with 5. [/q]

This must be wishful thinking for the second half of the season.:-P

Rosey

[Q]calgARI '07 Wrote:

 I'm gonna vote for Moulson who has zero even strength goals.[/q]

Thank you.

Let's be sane, people: no one on this team deserves the Hobey this year.

Kyle
[ homepage ]

ithacat

[Q]krose Wrote:

 [Q2]calgARI '07 Wrote:

 I'm gonna vote for Moulson who has zero even strength goals.[/Q]
Thank you.

Let's be sane, people: no one on this team deserves the Hobey this year.

Kyle[/q]

Sane? Like this nomination/PR process really has anything to do with determining the Hobey winner... Or, do you mean sane, as in less than half-a-season shouldn't begin to determine the Hobey winner? ;-)

Have some fun and nominate as many Cornell players as you want -- or nominate others if it helps you sleep better.

I want to know why there's no RIT players on the list. Jocelyn Guimond for the Hobey...::banana::

Beeeej

"And this year's Hobey Baker Memorial Award goes to... University of Wisconsin Badgers Equipment Manager Rob Malnory!"

Beeeej
Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

Rosey

[Q]Sane? Like this nomination/PR process really has anything to do with determining the Hobey winner... Or, do you mean sane, as in less than half-a-season shouldn't begin to determine the Hobey winner?  [/q]
Okay, let me rephrase:

If you believe the Hobey Baker award actually means something with respect to individual skill, talent, and/or effectiveness, then no Cornell player this year deserves it.

OTOH, if you believe the Hobey Baker award is simply a popularity contest, then by all means, vote for whomever you want for whatever reason (tallest?  cutest?) you want.

Cheers,
Kyle
[ homepage ]

ftyuv

Well, Chabot's tied with Moulson for even-strength goals, and with much less ice time.  He's already on the list... we should vote for him as a bloc and give him some recognition.

CowbellGuy

[Q]ftyuv Wrote:

 Well, Chabot's tied with Moulson for even-strength goals, and with much less ice time.  He's already on the list... we should vote for him as a bloc and give him some recognition.[/q]

/me runs off to register louisforhobey.com
"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy

Trotsky

[Q]krose Wrote:
If you believe the Hobey Baker award actually means something with respect to individual skill, talent, and/or effectiveness, then no Cornell player this year deserves it.

OTOH, if you believe the Hobey Baker award is simply a popularity contest, then by all means, vote for whomever you want for whatever reason (tallest?  cutest?) you want.[/q]

I agree with Kyle; check off another Sign of the End Times.

I'll ballot-stuff whenever there's a plausible argument for a Cornellian (Nieuwy, Lenny, Murray, McKee '05), but I can't get motivated during a season when performance is... er... "well-distributed." :-)

dbilmes

[Q]ftyuv Wrote:

 Well, Chabot's tied with Moulson for even-strength goals, and with much less ice time.  He's already on the list... we should vote for him as a bloc and give him some recognition.[/q]

Can't say I didn't vote for him, myself.