2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)

Started by Greg Berge, February 05, 2005, 06:43:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Jeff Hopkins '82


ugarte

We just marred their perfect record here at Lynah rink. BFD.

He did follow it up with the right words, though. (Great game, great teams, etc.)

DeltaOne81

Well, can't complain too much about 3 out of 4 points against Colgate. Can complain about how it happened a little. 8 unbeaten and this makes it 10-0-1 at home? Lets see how PWR shakes out tonight.

atb9

Too bad we couldn't win this one, but three ponts on the weekend against Gate is pretty darn good!  Gotta run!  It's been fun folks!
24 is the devil

CornellChris

An exciting tie (as tied tend to be). 4/4 would have been nice, but hard to complain about 3 points. Best part: I don't have to listen to those announcers ever again!

-Chris '03

DeltaOne81


Al DeFlorio

Al DeFlorio '65

puff

anyone going to start one? or are we all scared ::nut::
tewinks '04
stir crazy...

KeithK

[q]Greg broke the two game series up into a nine inning baseball game...a fun way to track the score across both games...I think Al alluded last night that two game series used to have an aggregate score to determine the winner?[/q]In the 80's the NCAA's used to use a two-game total goals format in the first round of the 8 team tournament.  So it was effectively a 120 minute game.  Cornell got burned by this in 86. They lost the first game to Denver 4-2 and won the second 4-3, but lost the series 7-6.

I don't think the ECAC playoffs ever used this system, though I could be wrong. The ECAC did use the brilliant mini-game and first to three point options though.

Al DeFlorio

[Q]KeithK Wrote:

 [Q2]Greg broke the two game series up into a nine inning baseball game...a fun way to track the score across both games...I think Al alluded last night that two game series used to have an aggregate score to determine the winner?[/Q]
In the 80's the NCAA's used to use a two-game total goals format in the first round of the 8 team tournament.  So it was effectively a 120 minute game.  Cornell got burned by this in 86. They lost the first game to Denver 4-2 and won the second 4-3, but lost the series 7-6.

I don't think the ECAC playoffs ever used this system, though I could be wrong. The ECAC did use the brilliant mini-game and first to three point options though. [/q]
The ECAC never used the two-game total goals format.  Only the first-round NCAA series, and perhaps first-round WCHA series.

The mini-game was awful, but first-to-three-points wasn't so bad.
Al DeFlorio '65

Avash

[Q]atb9 Wrote:

 [Q2]CornellChris Wrote:

 [Q2]Greg Berge Wrote:

 I use the Cornell feed, but you hafta pay.[/Q]
I can suffer through the Colgate feed, even if they DID play Ace of Base during the pre-game.

-Chris
[/Q]
I wonder if someone brought a good sign to the game tonight...[/q]


Just reading through some of the game thread, and I saw this and laughed. Adam, maybe noone else noticed, but I found it clever :-).