NCAAs quarterfinal Cornell vs. BU

Started by 617BigRed, March 28, 2025, 12:08:09 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

VIEWfromK

Quote from: jtwcornell91I think if they'd called it on the ice they would have given one of the two Terriers double-teaming him a minor, but since it was a replay challenge, they could only assess the major.

I don't think anything would have come of that get together if not for the facemask.  Walsh would have been better off with a punch than what he did do

stereax

we're all talking about the facemask call but how about yegorov and lachance double-teaming kraft, literally throwing him to the ice, and no penalty being called on that? that's much more egregious of a missed call. the facemask sucks but that's how it is in the rulebook :/
Law '27, Section C denizen, liveblogging from Lynah!

upprdeck

Calling it vs the Rule is the major problem

Its one thing to miss am elbow that knocks someone silly and replay to call it

Its another thing to call a facemask play like that as a major unless the tugging is egregious. Its a bad rule

Especially when punching is not allowed and when was the last time you saw them review those randomly other than when its a complete scrum?

Scersk '97

Quote from: upprdeckCalling it vs the Rule is the major problem

Its one thing to miss am elbow that knocks someone silly and replay to call it

Its another thing to call a facemask play like that as a major unless the tugging is egregious. Its a bad rule

Especially when punching is not allowed and when was the last time you saw them review those randomly other than when its a complete scrum?

The correct call was to call the facemask penalty and then "find" another major to call.

Basically, "Yep, you got your timeout back because technically there was a facemask there, but don't pull that crap again."

stereax

Quote from: Scersk '97
Quote from: upprdeckCalling it vs the Rule is the major problem

Its one thing to miss am elbow that knocks someone silly and replay to call it

Its another thing to call a facemask play like that as a major unless the tugging is egregious. Its a bad rule

Especially when punching is not allowed and when was the last time you saw them review those randomly other than when its a complete scrum?

The correct call was to call the facemask penalty and then "find" another major to call.

Basically, "Yep, you got your timeout back because technically there was a facemask there, but don't pull that crap again."
or even 5 for facemask and a minor for roughing
Law '27, Section C denizen, liveblogging from Lynah!

jtwcornell91

Quote from: stereax
Quote from: Scersk '97
Quote from: upprdeckCalling it vs the Rule is the major problem

Its one thing to miss am elbow that knocks someone silly and replay to call it

Its another thing to call a facemask play like that as a major unless the tugging is egregious. Its a bad rule

Especially when punching is not allowed and when was the last time you saw them review those randomly other than when its a complete scrum?

The correct call was to call the facemask penalty and then "find" another major to call.

Basically, "Yep, you got your timeout back because technically there was a facemask there, but don't pull that crap again."
or even 5 for facemask and a minor for roughing

That was my point; unfortunately they can't call a minor based on a replay, but I like Scott's idea of calling 5 for "contact to the head roughing" or some such.