Now *that* is bad goaltending.

[Greg Berge]

You want bad goaltending?

According to the USCHO box, Brown was outshot 18-38 in their 8-0 win over SLU last night.

[canucksfan]

Or very good goaltending from Brown. I assume that Danis got the shutout.

I remember SLU having very good goaltending in the days of old. My, how the standards have fallen.

[Will]

canucksfan wrote:

Or very good goaltending from Brown. I assume that Danis got the shutout.

I remember SLU having very good goaltending in the days of old. My, how the standards have fallen.

Yes, Danis got the shutout.  Undoubtedly, both he and the Brown defense are going to be hard to beat next weekend.  Although, after looking at this game, maybe we should be worried about a team that can score eight goals on eighteen shots.  ::yark::

[ugarte]

canucksfan wrote:

Or very good goaltending from Brown. I assume that Danis got the shutout.

I remember SLU having very good goaltending in the days of old. My, how the standards have fallen.

You must have meant and good goaltending from Brown.  Giving up 8 goals on 18 shots had to be bad goaltending from SLU.

[canucksfan]

::uhoh::
I was hoping no one would notice that.

[HOTELCALIFORNIA]

Or...
I left a hockey game today where my team had a total of 5 shots on net (according to sources after the game) and the other team had 35 shots on net. The score was 3-2. We won.

[Give My Regards]

Greg Berge '85 wrote:
You want bad goaltending?

NO, I don't want bad goaltending -- what the hey's the matter with you??  Oh, I get it...

Reminds me of the guy from Air Force when the Big Red hosted them several years ago.  Nine minutes played, six shots faced... one save.  That's a GAA of 33.33, folks.  No, he wasn't the backup, or at least he wasn't before the game started...