ECAC Inferiority

Started by Chris '03, March 27, 2011, 12:32:36 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

Josh '99

Yeesh, I enjoy games against Harvard as much as the next Cornell fan, but four scheduled per year would be a bit much, plus would we have anybody left healthy after four games against Brown?

Plus then you'd need to use some of those NC slots to schedule at least Clarkson and RPI and Colgate.  I don't really think it works as a separate conference.
"They do all kind of just blend together into one giant dildo."
-Ben Rocky 04

KeithK

We already have trouble filling the seven non-conference games with decent opponents (see non-conf games against Colgate, UAH).  Now you're going to add more non-confs?  Oh wait, we can just fill the slate with games against our old ECAC opponents!  So you end up with a schedule that looks sort of similar to what we had before except that instead of a few decent non-conf games we get more games against Brown and Dartmouth!  Yeah, that sounds appealing.

jtwcornell91

Quote from: KeithKWe already have trouble filling the seven non-conference games with decent opponents (see non-conf games against Colgate, UAH).  Now you're going to add more non-confs?  Oh wait, we can just fill the slate with games against our old ECAC opponents!  So you end up with a schedule that looks sort of similar to what we had before except that instead of a few decent non-conf games we don't play anybody, just Brom and Darmouth!  Yeah, that sounds appealing.

FYP :-}