Football v Fordham
Posted by Trotsky
Football v Fordham
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: October 17, 2009 01:33PM
No video, no audio, no nuttin'.
Fordham up 13-3. Cornell QB Adam Currie (?) with 2 INT so far.
Fordham up 13-3. Cornell QB Adam Currie (?) with 2 INT so far.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:08PM
Trotsky
No video, no audio, no nuttin'.
Fordham up 13-3. Cornell QB Adam Currie (?) with 2 INT so far.
Consider yourself fortunate. Over 300 yards passing by Fordham...in the 1st-half.
3 INTs by Currie in the half -- should have been 4. Cornell's only TD was a great catch by Walters on a ball that was a perfect strike to the Fordham defender. Great takeaway.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:27PM
Maybe Fordham QB's arm will get tired. So much for presuming Fordham to be like Columbia on a bad year.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:37PM
Another 50+ pass play for a TD (on a WR screen). This came one play after an 80+ run was called back. Cornell CBs can be blown out of a play by a breeze.
32-13
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:50PM
You're down by 16 in the 3Q...you're inside the Fordham 10...so you bring in a freshman QB who's been on the sideline for your 3 & 7...
Well, the FG was good.
Another passing TD for Fordham.
Well, the FG was good.
Another passing TD for Fordham.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: scoop85 (---.hvc.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:51PM
Fordham moves right downfield for an easy touchdown, now 32-13. That drive reminded me of last week's Giants-Raiders game.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 03:04PM
Another pick for Fordham... I think it's #5 or 6, I've lost count.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: October 17, 2009 04:02PM
Oh well. Least it's not an Ivy game. And that much more donor movement to hockey...
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: nyc94 (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 04:11PM
Trotsky
Oh well. Least it's not an Ivy game. And that much more donor movement to hockey...
They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
Date: October 17, 2009 06:01PM
Football is probably safe, if only because they need to hold graduation somewhere.nyc94Trotsky
Oh well. Least it's not an Ivy game. And that much more donor movement to hockey...
They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 18, 2009 10:55AM
nyc94
They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.
That place could use some redevelopment. I love the setting, but the facility is a pit. Add up Cornell's heady football history, impressive fund raising apparatus, prestigious architecture and landscape architecture programs, and it's easy to imagine a spectacular complex. Ah, to dream...
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: October 18, 2009 11:05AM
Attitudes like this are the reason why we have Uris, the three Olins (one of which rose from the ashes of the stunning Boardman Hall), Clark, the Engineering school, Mallott, the new Roberts and Kennedy (which replaced beautiful old stone Stone and Roberts), Bradfield, Ho Plaza, etc. Yikes. There's nothing wrong with the Crescent that cannot be renovated without "redeveloping" the place.ithacatnyc94
They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.
That place could use some redevelopment. I love the setting, but the facility is a pit. Add up Cornell's heady football history, impressive fund raising apparatus, prestigious architecture and landscape architecture programs, and it's easy to imagine a spectacular complex. Ah, to dream...
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 18, 2009 06:27PM
Kyle RoseAttitudes like this are the reason why we have Uris, the three Olins (one of which rose from the ashes of the stunning Boardman Hall), Clark, the Engineering school, Mallott, the new Roberts and Kennedy (which replaced beautiful old stone Stone and Roberts), Bradfield, Ho Plaza, etc. Yikes. There's nothing wrong with the Crescent that cannot be renovated without "redeveloping" the place.ithacatnyc94
They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.
That place could use some redevelopment. I love the setting, but the facility is a pit. Add up Cornell's heady football history, impressive fund raising apparatus, prestigious architecture and landscape architecture programs, and it's easy to imagine a spectacular complex. Ah, to dream...
I never said tear down the Crescent. Redevelopment doesn't necessarily mean raze. See Sage Hall.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: October 18, 2009 07:28PM
Sorry, but "redevelop" clearly has a "tear-down-and-replace" connotation, a la eminent domain redevelopment authorities that replace rows of old houses with shopping malls. What you want is "renovate" or "rehabilitate".ithacat
I never said tear down the Crescent. Redevelopment doesn't necessarily mean raze. See Sage Hall.
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: mnagowski (---.allfirst.com)
Date: October 19, 2009 10:33AM
Perhaps we should redevelop our football program though?
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.