Tuesday, April 23rd, 2024
 
 
 
Updates automatically
Twitter Link
CHN iOS App
 
NCAA
1967 1970

ECAC
1967 1968 1969 1970 1973 1980 1986 1996 1997 2003 2005 2010

IVY
1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1977 1978 1983 1984 1985 1996 1997 2002 2003 2004 2005 2012 2014

Cleary Bedpan
2002 2003 2005

Ned Harkness Cup
2003 2005 2008 2013
 
Brendon
Iles
Pokulok
Schafer
Syphilis

Football v Fordham

Posted by Trotsky 
Football v Fordham
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: October 17, 2009 01:33PM

No video, no audio, no nuttin'.

Fordham up 13-3. Cornell QB Adam Currie (?) with 2 INT so far.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:08PM

Trotsky
No video, no audio, no nuttin'.

Fordham up 13-3. Cornell QB Adam Currie (?) with 2 INT so far.

Consider yourself fortunate. Over 300 yards passing by Fordham...in the 1st-half.

3 INTs by Currie in the half -- should have been 4. Cornell's only TD was a great catch by Walters on a ball that was a perfect strike to the Fordham defender. Great takeaway.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:27PM

Maybe Fordham QB's arm will get tired. So much for presuming Fordham to be like Columbia on a bad year.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:37PM

Another 50+ pass play for a TD (on a WR screen). This came one play after an 80+ run was called back. Cornell CBs can be blown out of a play by a breeze.
 
32-13
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:50PM

You're down by 16 in the 3Q...you're inside the Fordham 10...so you bring in a freshman QB who's been on the sideline for your 3 & 7...doh

Well, the FG was good.

Another passing TD for Fordham.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: scoop85 (---.hvc.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 02:51PM

Fordham moves right downfield for an easy touchdown, now 32-13. That drive reminded me of last week's Giants-Raiders game.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 03:04PM

Another pick for Fordham... I think it's #5 or 6, I've lost count.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: October 17, 2009 04:02PM

Oh well. Least it's not an Ivy game. And that much more donor movement to hockey...
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: nyc94 (---.cable.mindspring.com)
Date: October 17, 2009 04:11PM

Trotsky
Oh well. Least it's not an Ivy game. And that much more donor movement to hockey...

They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
Date: October 17, 2009 06:01PM

nyc94
Trotsky
Oh well. Least it's not an Ivy game. And that much more donor movement to hockey...

They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.
Football is probably safe, if only because they need to hold graduation somewhere.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 18, 2009 10:55AM

nyc94
They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.

That place could use some redevelopment. I love the setting, but the facility is a pit. Add up Cornell's heady football history, impressive fund raising apparatus, prestigious architecture and landscape architecture programs, and it's easy to imagine a spectacular complex. Ah, to dream...
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: October 18, 2009 11:05AM

ithacat
nyc94
They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.

That place could use some redevelopment. I love the setting, but the facility is a pit. Add up Cornell's heady football history, impressive fund raising apparatus, prestigious architecture and landscape architecture programs, and it's easy to imagine a spectacular complex. Ah, to dream...
Attitudes like this are the reason why we have Uris, the three Olins (one of which rose from the ashes of the stunning Boardman Hall), Clark, the Engineering school, Mallott, the new Roberts and Kennedy (which replaced beautiful old stone Stone and Roberts), Bradfield, Ho Plaza, etc. Yikes. There's nothing wrong with the Crescent that cannot be renovated without "redeveloping" the place.

 
___________________________
[ home | FB ]
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: October 18, 2009 06:27PM

Kyle Rose
ithacat
nyc94
They better turn the football program around before the next Cornell Master Plan casts an eye on Schoellkopf as a redevelopment zone.

That place could use some redevelopment. I love the setting, but the facility is a pit. Add up Cornell's heady football history, impressive fund raising apparatus, prestigious architecture and landscape architecture programs, and it's easy to imagine a spectacular complex. Ah, to dream...
Attitudes like this are the reason why we have Uris, the three Olins (one of which rose from the ashes of the stunning Boardman Hall), Clark, the Engineering school, Mallott, the new Roberts and Kennedy (which replaced beautiful old stone Stone and Roberts), Bradfield, Ho Plaza, etc. Yikes. There's nothing wrong with the Crescent that cannot be renovated without "redeveloping" the place.

I never said tear down the Crescent. Redevelopment doesn't necessarily mean raze. See Sage Hall.
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: October 18, 2009 07:28PM

ithacat
I never said tear down the Crescent. Redevelopment doesn't necessarily mean raze. See Sage Hall.
Sorry, but "redevelop" clearly has a "tear-down-and-replace" connotation, a la eminent domain redevelopment authorities that replace rows of old houses with shopping malls. What you want is "renovate" or "rehabilitate".

 
___________________________
[ home | FB ]
 
Re: Football v Fordham
Posted by: mnagowski (---.allfirst.com)
Date: October 19, 2009 10:33AM

Perhaps we should redevelop our football program though?

 
___________________________
The moniker formally know as metaezra.
[www.metaezra.com]
 

Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.

Click here to login