2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by Greg Berge
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (3rd)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:21PM
:14
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:21PM
Cook stopped at the buzzer. OT.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (3rd)
Posted by: CornellChris (---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:22PM
OVERTIME.... I don't think I can take much more of this!
-Chris '03
-Chris '03
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (3rd)
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.airproducts.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:22PM
And it's going to OT.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: atb9 (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:22PM
[Q]Greg Berge Wrote:
Cook stopped at the buzzer. OT.[/q]
Phew...1-1-2 on the season in OT...first time in OT at Lynah this season
Cook stopped at the buzzer. OT.[/q]
Phew...1-1-2 on the season in OT...first time in OT at Lynah this season
___________________________
24 is the devil
24 is the devil
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Chris 02 (---.icsincorporated.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:23PM
OVERTIME!
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:24PM
Crowd is defeaning.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: KenP (---.tu.ok.cox.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:24PM
wow...and we surpassed 200 posts tonight without needing to resort to padding!
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:25PM
McKee big save.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:25PM
"Let's Go Red!"
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: bob chunky (---.lndnnh.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:26PM
these announcers make me scared, they scream whenever colgate shoots
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.airproducts.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:27PM
3 minutes or so left in OT.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:27PM
O'Byrne pulled down, no call.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:27PM
Iggy touching the puck again, hope, hope...
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:28PM
Gate ices, 2:12 remaining.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: bob chunky (---.lndnnh.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:28PM
cornell great pressure, iced by colgate
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:28PM
Cornell wins the face, Downs holds it in, but no shot.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:29PM
Downs deflectes Mitchell shot in Cornell end; now Abbott and Downs trying to clear but Gate has the puck. 1:16.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: ugarte (---.ny325.east.verizon.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:29PM
1:25 left
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:29PM
Pegs deflection JUST wide.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: bob chunky (---.lndnnh.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:30PM
1:00 left
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: atb9 (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:30PM
LGR!!!!!!!! 
___________________________
24 is the devil
24 is the devil
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: ugarte (---.ny325.east.verizon.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:30PM
I think Greg is ahead of me...
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:30PM
Now Pegs blocks on the other end, he's everywhere. Lots of action now.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Greg Berge (---.frdrmd.adelphia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:30PM
Game tied. 3 point weekend. I will take it.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Jeff Hopkins '82 (---.airproducts.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:31PM
Final. 2-2
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: ugarte (---.ny325.east.verizon.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:32PM
We just marred their perfect record here at Lynah rink. BFD.
He did follow it up with the right words, though. (Great game, great teams, etc.)
He did follow it up with the right words, though. (Great game, great teams, etc.)
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (3rd)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.patmedia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:32PM
Well, can't complain too much about 3 out of 4 points against Colgate. Can complain about how it happened a little. 8 unbeaten and this makes it 10-0-1 at home? Lets see how PWR shakes out tonight.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: atb9 (---.nycap.res.rr.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:33PM
Too bad we couldn't win this one, but three ponts on the weekend against Gate is pretty darn good! Gotta run! It's been fun folks!
___________________________
24 is the devil
24 is the devil
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: CornellChris (---.proxy.aol.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:35PM
An exciting tie (as tied tend to be). 4/4 would have been nice, but hard to complain about 3 points. Best part: I don't have to listen to those announcers ever again!
-Chris '03
-Chris '03
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: DeltaOne81 (---.patmedia.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:39PM
Postgame thread anyone?
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:40PM
B-ball won in 2 OT
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Al DeFlorio '65
Re: 2/5: Cornell 2 Colgate 2 (ot)
Posted by: puff (---.pn.at.cox.net)
Date: February 05, 2005 09:43PM
anyone going to start one? or are we all scared 
___________________________
tewinks '04
stir crazy...
tewinks '04
stir crazy...
Re: 2/5: Cornell 1 Colgate 1 (2nd)
Posted by: KeithK (---.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net)
Date: February 06, 2005 01:28AM
[q]Greg broke the two game series up into a nine inning baseball game...a fun way to track the score across both games...I think Al alluded last night that two game series used to have an aggregate score to determine the winner?[/q]In the 80's the NCAA's used to use a two-game total goals format in the first round of the 8 team tournament. So it was effectively a 120 minute game. Cornell got burned by this in 86. They lost the first game to Denver 4-2 and won the second 4-3, but lost the series 7-6.
I don't think the ECAC playoffs ever used this system, though I could be wrong. The ECAC did use the brilliant mini-game and first to three point options though.
I don't think the ECAC playoffs ever used this system, though I could be wrong. The ECAC did use the brilliant mini-game and first to three point options though.
Re: 2/5: Cornell 1 Colgate 1 (2nd)
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.ne.client2.attbi.com)
Date: February 06, 2005 08:07AM
[Q]KeithK Wrote:
Greg broke the two game series up into a nine inning baseball game...a fun way to track the score across both games...I think Al alluded last night that two game series used to have an aggregate score to determine the winner?[/Q]
In the 80's the NCAA's used to use a two-game total goals format in the first round of the 8 team tournament. So it was effectively a 120 minute game. Cornell got burned by this in 86. They lost the first game to Denver 4-2 and won the second 4-3, but lost the series 7-6.
I don't think the ECAC playoffs ever used this system, though I could be wrong. The ECAC did use the brilliant mini-game and first to three point options though. [/q]
The ECAC never used the two-game total goals format. Only the first-round NCAA series, and perhaps first-round WCHA series.
The mini-game was awful, but first-to-three-points wasn't so bad.
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Re: 2/5: Cornell 0 Colgate 0 (1st)
Posted by: Avash (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: February 06, 2005 12:54PM
[Q]atb9 Wrote:
CornellChris Wrote:
Greg Berge Wrote:
I use the Cornell feed, but you hafta pay.[/Q]
I can suffer through the Colgate feed, even if they DID play Ace of Base during the pre-game.
-Chris
[/Q]
I wonder if someone brought a good sign to the game tonight...[/q]
Just reading through some of the game thread, and I saw this and laughed. Adam, maybe noone else noticed, but I found it clever.
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.