Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, Final
Posted by RichH
Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, Final
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:02PM
Scoring Period 1: 1-0 SLU 01:12 Bollig (Vermeulen, Curran) 2-0 SLU 18:27 Ross (Bogosian) Period 2: 3-0 SLU 02:17 DeVergilio (Fensel, Caister) PP 4-0 SLU 09:21 Miskovic (Parenteau, DeVergilio) PP Period 3: 4-1 CU 00:27 R. Nash (Greening) 5-1 SLU 05:12 Vermeulen (Bollig) 6-1 SLU 07:35 Keller (unassisted) ENG 7-1 SLU 08:38 Ross (Vermeulen) PP 8-1 SLU 13:21 Klancher (DeVergilio) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Penalties Period 1: 10:55 SLU DeVergilio Interference 12:52 SLU Generous Hooking 13:08 CU Gallagher Holding the Stick 13:34 CU B. Nash High Sticking 18:47 CU Greening Boarding 19:02 SLU McKenzie Holding the Stick Period 2: 00:34 CU Krueger Interference 04:07 SLU McBride Boarding 07:13 CU R. Nash CTH Elbowing 09:13 CU P. Kennedy Cross Checking 13:22 CU Greening Tripping 17:27 SLU Generous Interference 18:03 CU Gallagher CTH High Sticking 18:03 SLU McBride Roughing Period 3: 08:01 SLU Keller Roughing 08:01 SLU Caister Roughing + 10-Min Misconduct 08:01 CU P. Kennedy Roughing 08:01 CU M. Kennedy Charging Major + 10-Min Misconduct 08:38 CU Roeszler Cross Checking 14:07 SLU Bollig Obstruction Holding 18:16 CU R. Nash Cross Checking 18:39 SLU Miskovic CTH Roughing ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Shots Period 1 2 3 Total CU 10 3 22 35 SLU 12 17 10 39 Three Stars: Are you serious? 3. Petizian 2. Vermeulen 1. Ross
*whew*
Edited 30 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 09:47PM by RichH.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 1, 1st Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:06PM
Very fast start by St. Lawrence, off to the early lead and putting pressure on the Cornell D.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 1, 1st Period
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:21PM
M. Kennedy hits the post on the transition back from a SLU SH break. Now Kennedy being tended to by the trainer, but seems to be OK.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 1, 1st Period
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:27PM
In about 30 seconds, Cornell goes from being on a 5x3 PP to being down 3x4.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 1, 1st Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:28PM
A tone deaf hillbilly is in charge of the Appleton mix tape.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 2, 1st Period
Posted by: amerks127 (---.w90-28.abo.wanadoo.fr)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:33PM
We've been here twice before against Colgate.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 2, 1st Period
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:34PM
SLU deflection of a shot from the R point. 18:27.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 1, 1st Period
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:36PM
And his brother of equal talents is the radio announcer along with his best bud, Wally. I loved this exchange:Trotsky
A tone deaf hillbilly is in charge of the Appleton mix tape.
"Play's been stopped. Did you see what happened, Wally? I couldn't see."
"The net's off."
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 2, 1st Period
Posted by: dbilmes (---.adsl.snet.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:37PM
That's the optimistic view!amerks127
We've been here twice before against Colgate.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 2, 1st Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 07:58PM
Ah, the North Country trip...
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 2, 1st Period
Posted by: Al DeFlorio (---.hsd1.ma.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:06PM
Uncharted waters now.amerks127
We've been here twice before against Colgate.
Maybe we should stop fretting about where Cornell would be sent as a #1 seed.
___________________________
Al DeFlorio '65
Al DeFlorio '65
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: amerks127 (---.w90-28.abo.wanadoo.fr)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:09PM
Al DeFlorioUncharted waters now.amerks127
We've been here twice before against Colgate.
Maybe we should stop fretting about where Cornell would be sent as a #1 seed.
4-0 now. Garman time? Maybe we should be worried about penalties.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 08:10PM by amerks127.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 3, 2nd Period
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:10PM
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: amerks127 (---.w90-28.abo.wanadoo.fr)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:12PM
Garman is in.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: Dafatone (---.resnet.colorado.edu)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:13PM
Anyone watching want to tell me what's going on? Are we looking awful out there, or has Scrivens just been letting in easy shots?
Probably both.
Probably both.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 3, 2nd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:13PM
You're never as good as you look when you win, and...
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:15PM
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: Roy 82 (128.18.14.---)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:16PM
Dafatone
Anyone watching want to tell me what's going on? Are we looking awful out there, or has Scrivens just been letting in easy shots?
Probably both.
Don't worry, the team studied the Yale game plan from last weekend. Look for four goals in the next period and a win in OT.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:18PM
Shots in this period: 14-2.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:36PM
Trotsky
Shots in this period: 14-2.
17-3 when all was said and done in the 2nd.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: Jordan 04 (---.nyc.res.rr.com)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:48PM
Roy 82Dafatone
Anyone watching want to tell me what's going on? Are we looking awful out there, or has Scrivens just been letting in easy shots?
Probably both.
Don't worry, the team studied the Yale game plan from last weekend. Look for four goals in the next period and a win in OT.
And it begins!
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: Chris 02 (---.dsl.hstntx.sbcglobal.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:54PM
4-1
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 4, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:56PM
Not tonight. 5-1.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 08:59PM
Garman pulled with 12:50 left...interesting move by Schafer.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:00PM
Mike pulls Garman, channeling Yale. I can't recall Mike ever pulling a goalie so early (or needing to, maybe).
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:00PM
6-1.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:00PM
Trotsky
Mike pulls Garman, channeling Yale. I can't recall Mike ever pulling a goalie so early (or needing to, maybe).
And that leads to an ENG.
6-1.
Sigh.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:01PM
Note to Schafer: we're not Yale.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: RedWins11 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:02PM
ughh...some frustration...petizian getting knocked around a little too much...come on guys keep it clean
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: ugarte (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:02PM
Well, that was unsatisfying. Maybe I'll have better luck checking the Other Sports forum.
___________________________
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
quality tweets | bluesky (twitter 2) | ALAB Series podcast | Other podcasts and writing
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 2, 1st Period
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:02PM
Al DeFlorioUncharted waters now.amerks127
We've been here twice before against Colgate.
Maybe we should stop fretting about where Cornell would be sent as a #1 seed.
... and start fretting about, if we survive (get to) Albany, where we get sent to play the #1 seed.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: RedWins11 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:03PM
well we get the power play off of that it appears
never mind...major for Kennedy and 10 min misconduct
2 min for other kennedy
never mind...major for Kennedy and 10 min misconduct
2 min for other kennedy
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 09:07PM by RedWins11.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: Kyle Rose (---.bstnma.fios.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:07PM
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 6, 3rd Period
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:08PM
Please no Game DQs.
Re: Cornell 0 @ SLU(t) 4, 2nd Period
Posted by: dbilmes (---.adsl.snet.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:08PM
At least the men's basketball team won big!
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 6, 3rd Period
Posted by: amerks127 (---.w90-28.abo.wanadoo.fr)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:09PM
Unbelievable. The best we can hope for is a tie from Yale-Princeton tonight which leaves us with a two-point lead in the standings. If Yale wins, that lead is down to one point. [Edit: Yale won 3-1] Finishing first is so crucial because it likely avoids playing Yale/Princeton until the finals in Albany. Not trying to get ahead of myself here, but every point is crucial.
Harvard also won too...
Harvard also won too...
Edited 2 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 09:16PM by amerks127.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:09PM
PPG for Ross.
7-1.
Can I go to bed now?
7-1.
Can I go to bed now?
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 6, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:10PM
That's what I was thinking. Mail it in and start over tomorrow.sah67
Please no Game DQs.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:12PM
Whoops...mistake post.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 09:12PM by sah67.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:12PM
Cornell should keep their heads together and keep playing hard. They are going to have to play Clarkson tomorrow night at Cheel.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 09:13PM by lynah80.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:14PM
A brave cowbell effort in defeat.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: jy3 (---.bflony.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:16PM
Oooo what happened or is happening
___________________________
LGR!!!!!!!!!!
jy3 '00
LGR!!!!!!!!!!
jy3 '00
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:17PM
Nice shorty attempts by Collins.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:17PM
Still happening. Great game by a home team vs total collapse by a visiting team. It's not as close as the score.jy3
Oooo what happened or is happening
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, 3rd Period
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:19PM
8-1.
I want to go to bed now.
I want to go to bed now.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:19PM
8. And there's still 7 minutes to go. Is Troy Davenport dressed?
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:19PM
The score is terrible. But the St. Lawrence announcers are making it worth the seven bucks. Almost.
Wally the color guy apparently studied Art Carney's mastery of the Ed Norton character in the Honeymooners.
Oh, geez, now it's 8-1. Guess Scrivens starts tomorrow unless he's got the flu.
Wally the color guy apparently studied Art Carney's mastery of the Ed Norton character in the Honeymooners.
Oh, geez, now it's 8-1. Guess Scrivens starts tomorrow unless he's got the flu.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: mhand06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:22PM
Whydid B. Nash leave the ice? Is he hurt?
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, 3rd Period
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:22PM
Oh, good, Cornell gets a PP. That should start the comebook.
announcer says, "Cornell goes on the man advantage for the next couple minutes, unless they score."
Earlier he said the SLU PPG "negates the Cornell penalty." Am I too tired or is that not the right word?
announcer says, "Cornell goes on the man advantage for the next couple minutes, unless they score."
Earlier he said the SLU PPG "negates the Cornell penalty." Am I too tired or is that not the right word?
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:22PM
20th game of the season.
19 goals given up in three of them. (6.33)
16 goals given up in the other 17. (0.94)
19 goals given up in three of them. (6.33)
16 goals given up in the other 17. (0.94)
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 09:26PM by Trotsky.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: mnagowski (---.bflony.fios.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:25PM
Sometimes a coin lands on heads a couple more times in a row than what you might otherwise expect. I suspect that is what happened with us earlier this season.
At least the women kept the score respectable against St. Lawrence -- losing only 2-1 to the team that stands atop the ECAC and ranked No. 4 in the country.
At least the women kept the score respectable against St. Lawrence -- losing only 2-1 to the team that stands atop the ECAC and ranked No. 4 in the country.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 09:26PM by mnagowski.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:27PM
For all you history buffs, has a good team ever been beaten this badly? Someone has to be able to put this in perspective.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:28PM
billhoward
Oh, geez, now it's 8-1.
One more, and I'm removing the (t) from the thread subject.
I also resign from being the game threadmaster. I think I'm 1-2-0 this year (0-2-0 the last 2 weeks), and I was in the crowd for the 3rd loss.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:28PM
Maybe, but it's been all tails tonight. My advice is buy Cornell stock tonight; it will never be lower.mnagowski
Sometimes a coin lands on heads a couple more times in a row than what you might otherwise expect. I suspect that is what happened with us earlier this season.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:28PM
And sometimes teams just have bad nights.
Games like this build character.
Games like this build character.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: mhand06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:29PM
Why did B. Nash leave the ice?
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: RichH (---.hsd1.ct.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:31PM
mhand06
Why did B. Nash leave the ice?
Nobody knows yet. Stop asking.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, 3rd Period
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:32PM
Schafer should take a hard look at Mike Garman and decide if he is really ready for NCAA hockey. Unless Troy Davenport has some kind of health problem, he probably should be getting some playing time.
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 09:35PM by lynah80.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: Trotsky (---.hsd1.md.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:32PM
ithacat
For all you history buffs, has a good team ever been beaten this badly? Someone has to be able to put this in perspective.
A very good 1986 Cornell team lost Fish N' Fowl 11-3. That's what comes to my mind.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: RedWins11 (---.resnet.cornell.edu)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:32PM
well i'd say thats about enough character building for me
3rd period SOG
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:36PM
According to Jason, SOG were 22-10 in favor of Cornell in the third period.
When was the last time we had that many SOG in a third period?
When was the last time we had that many SOG in a third period?
Re: 3rd period SOG
Posted by: dbilmes (---.adsl.snet.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:38PM
The last time we lost 8-1sah67
When was the last time we had that many SOG in a third period?
Re: 3rd period SOG
Posted by: lynah80 (---.phlapa.east.verizon.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:42PM
sah67
According to Jason, SOG were 22-10 in favor of Cornell in the third period.
When was the last time we had that many SOG in a third period?
Yeah, it shows they didn't just roll over and give up at the end.
Unless the team has the flu, these guys will come out strong tomorrow night.
Re: 3rd period SOG
Posted by: mhand06 (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 30, 2009 09:44PM
so many shots so little to non goals
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: Rita (---.hsd1.in.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 10:08PM
lynah80
And sometimes teams just have bad nights.
Games like this build character.
Didn't we say something to this effect last week after the loss to Yale?
I think it was 2006 North Country trip that the team (at least McKee) had the flu. Not that I wish anyone to be sick, but at least it would explain a lot about this game.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: ebilmes (206.53.144.---)
Date: January 30, 2009 10:20PM
mhand06
Whydid B. Nash leave the ice? Is he hurt?
Schafer kicked him out of the game. No joke
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 5, 3rd Period
Posted by: sah67 (---.dyn.optonline.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 10:37PM
ebilmesmhand06
Whydid B. Nash leave the ice? Is he hurt?
Schafer kicked him out of the game. No joke
Schafer clearly just doesn't understand his style...he's very deliberate and smooth with his stickhandling
Edited 1 time(s). Last edit at 01/30/2009 10:58PM by sah67.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, Final - postgame
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 10:42PM
This game doesn't deserve a postgame thread.
I agree that sometimes you just get rolled over. The bounces don't go Cornell's way. The one missed bounce in particular: the 2-on-1 Kennedy and Kennedy breakaway (was it them - I'm relying on the SLU radio guy) early in the third that would have closed it to 4-2. It should've gone in; it didn't.
Scrivens gave up 4; Garman gave up 3. I don't think that means Davenport necessarily is the backup goalie for the next series.
Would that it was the flu that did in Cornell.
Is there a pattern: Quick teams do well against Cornell now?
The 22-10 SOG advantage for Cornell in the third shows Cornell did not play dead. And 35-39 on shots is pretty close for the game.
On to Clarkson.
I agree that sometimes you just get rolled over. The bounces don't go Cornell's way. The one missed bounce in particular: the 2-on-1 Kennedy and Kennedy breakaway (was it them - I'm relying on the SLU radio guy) early in the third that would have closed it to 4-2. It should've gone in; it didn't.
Scrivens gave up 4; Garman gave up 3. I don't think that means Davenport necessarily is the backup goalie for the next series.
Would that it was the flu that did in Cornell.
Is there a pattern: Quick teams do well against Cornell now?
The 22-10 SOG advantage for Cornell in the third shows Cornell did not play dead. And 35-39 on shots is pretty close for the game.
On to Clarkson.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 10:45PM
I was something like 5-0 as an occasional game threadmaster, then volunteered to do, I think it was, an ECAC quarterfinal game when no one else wanted to. You know the rest. We never got to Albany.RichHbillhoward
Oh, geez, now it's 8-1.
One more, and I'm removing the (t) from the thread subject.
I also resign from being the game threadmaster. I think I'm 1-2-0 this year (0-2-0 the last 2 weeks), and I was in the crowd for the 3rd loss.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, Final
Posted by: cth95 (---.hsd1.vt.comcast.net)
Date: January 30, 2009 11:24PM
I just turned on my computer. In case someone didn't notice, April Fool's is still a couple of months away. Would someone please post the real game thread?
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, Final
Posted by: Robb (---.gradacc.ox.ac.uk)
Date: January 30, 2009 11:27PM
Silver Lining:
5 of the top 6 (by poll) lost tonight. Wow.
5 of the top 6 (by poll) lost tonight. Wow.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, Final - postgame
Posted by: HockeyMan (67.244.37.---)
Date: January 31, 2009 12:21AM
billhoward
This game doesn't deserve a postgame thread.
On the contrary, I would like precisely such a thread after a night like this. Could someone who saw it give us at least a paragraph on what happened?
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, Final - postgame
Posted by: ebilmes (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 31, 2009 01:31AM
I'm at a friend's house so I'll have to wait til tomorrow night to write a longer summary.
But...as for B. Nash, he was involved in a little scuffle around the SLUt net after the Kennedy major. Schafer clearly didn't like something that happened, maybe that he was still going after Petizian, and as Nash skated towards the bench Schafer pointed towards the locker room. Nash obligingly walked off the ice and wasn't seen again.
Folks, this was just a terrible game. The shots in the 3rd were misleading because many of them were frustration-type shots from the blue line. Just awful awful awful awful.
Most bizarre play was Schafer pulling Garman with 11 mins left and allowing an ENG. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think SLUt had too many men out for the faceoff, Schafer assumed it would be called and pulled Garman, it wasn't called, and then SLUt scored. (?) Just caps up the night.
Let's win tomorrow. LGR.
But...as for B. Nash, he was involved in a little scuffle around the SLUt net after the Kennedy major. Schafer clearly didn't like something that happened, maybe that he was still going after Petizian, and as Nash skated towards the bench Schafer pointed towards the locker room. Nash obligingly walked off the ice and wasn't seen again.
Folks, this was just a terrible game. The shots in the 3rd were misleading because many of them were frustration-type shots from the blue line. Just awful awful awful awful.
Most bizarre play was Schafer pulling Garman with 11 mins left and allowing an ENG. Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I think SLUt had too many men out for the faceoff, Schafer assumed it would be called and pulled Garman, it wasn't called, and then SLUt scored. (?) Just caps up the night.
Let's win tomorrow. LGR.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 8, Final
Posted by: billhoward (---.hsd1.nj.comcast.net)
Date: January 31, 2009 08:07AM
Just like college football. Does Utah have a hockey team that won't get invited the title game?Robb
Silver Lining:
5 of the top 6 (by poll) lost tonight. Wow.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 31, 2009 11:14AM
Trotskyithacat
For all you history buffs, has a good team ever been beaten this badly? Someone has to be able to put this in perspective.
A very good 1986 Cornell team lost Fish N' Fowl 11-3. That's what comes to my mind.
Thanks...the perspective helps. Since the weekend already feels surreal, it might be time to start working on my taxes.
Let's Go Red...
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: ACM (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 31, 2009 06:22PM
ithacat
For all you history buffs, has a good team ever been beaten this badly? Someone has to be able to put this in perspective.
12/27/95 Cornell loses to Colorado College 11-0 in the opening round of the Denver Cup Tournament
3/16/96 Cornell defeats Harvard 2-1 to win ECAC Tournament in Mike Schafer's first season
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: Rita (---.hsd1.in.comcast.net)
Date: January 31, 2009 06:57PM
ACMithacat
For all you history buffs, has a good team ever been beaten this badly? Someone has to be able to put this in perspective.
12/27/95 Cornell loses to Colorado College 11-0 in the opening round of the Denver Cup Tournament
3/16/96 Cornell defeats Harvard 2-1 to win ECAC Tournament in Mike Schafer's first season
Thank you Arthur. Things don't look as gloomy now. Common sense tells you that there will be a few bad games during the course of a season, but they still sting when they happen.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: jtwcornell91 (Moderator)
Date: January 31, 2009 07:23PM
ACMithacat
For all you history buffs, has a good team ever been beaten this badly? Someone has to be able to put this in perspective.
12/27/95 Cornell loses to Colorado College 11-0 in the opening round of the Denver Cup Tournament
3/16/96 Cornell defeats Harvard 2-1 to win ECAC Tournament in Mike Schafer's first season
There was also a 7-1 (I think) loss at BU.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: rstott (---.hsd1.va.comcast.net)
Date: January 31, 2009 09:46PM
ithacat
For all you history buffs, has a good team ever been beaten this badly? Someone has to be able to put this in perspective.
1973 -- BU 9-CU 0, Clarkson 10-CU 1. Cornell went 23-5-1, won the ECAC and lose to Wisconsin 6-5 in the NCAA semis.
Re: Cornell 1 @ SLU(t) 7, 3rd Period
Posted by: ithacat (---.twcny.res.rr.com)
Date: January 31, 2009 09:56PM
To the history buffs, thank you for bringing the weekend into a softer focus.
LGR...
LGR...
Sorry, only registered users may post in this forum.