Premature RPI, PWR and KRACH

[jtwcornell91]

Since people were asking about it, and since Brown's loss and Alabama-Huntsville's win make the KRACH basically well-defined, I've put up the rankings page for the new season.  No KPWR, since I haven't decided what to do in response to the changes to PWR.

http://slack.net/~whelan/tbrw/tbrw.cgi?2003/rankings

We're #1 in the KRACH (we have to be because of our perfect record) and #2 behind BC in the RPI and PWR.

Of course, as the subject line indicates, we shouldn't read too much into ratings based on between four and thirteen games per team.

[jtwcornell91]

With the loss, we drop into the finite KRACH pool with everyone else.  We land at #8, although we're still #2 in the RPI and PWR.

[nshapiro]

John,

You might want to sort the table at the above link by RPI, that way the TUC are the top teams and the PWR rankings will display properly.

Neil

[jtwcornell91]

I figured sorting the comparison table by winning percentage would be the most neutral thing to do (I used to sort it by KRACH).  I've fixed the bug that kept TUCs with losing records from having their PWRs show up in the comparison table.