Harvard(sucks) @ Lynah

Started by Ben Doyle 03, November 11, 2002, 01:26:18 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Section A

and they were 8-1, not 9-1. they then lost 7 straight.

jtwcornell91

Matt Carberry wrote:
QuoteI think that should be November 2000.
Right, it was November of the 2000-2001 season.


jtwcornell91

Avash \\'05 wrote:
Quoteand they were 8-1, not 9-1. they then lost 7 straight.
Right again; their tenth game was a loss to Niagara.


adamw

USCHO generally -- agree or disagree -- has waited until all teams played 16 teams to post PWR.  To be honest, I don't know what will be the consideration now that the criteria has been eliminated.

Perhaps it will just be whenever the programmers are able to re-write the program. :-)

And - John - if you need help on searching USCHO, just let me know :-)
College Hockey News: http://www.collegehockeynews.com

Beeeej

That was sort of the intended gist of my "independent source" question, BRA.  But remember, I'm in law school now - so I need to see evidence and refutation.  :-D

Beeeej

Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

bigred apple

I'd settle for either, Beeej. ::rolleyes::   A bit early in your legal career for Article 8 of the F.R.E., but what you have here isn't evidence. We can discuss the finer points at Baker Field on Saturday.

rhovorka

Yeah...and I also "heard" that Chris Higgins had agreed to come to Cornell, but went to Yale instead.  Maybe the Daily Sun can break this Harvard non-story as well.
Rich H '96

Beeeej

Don't tell me you're claiming Ben '03 made a deathbed statement.  :-))

See you Saturday!

Beeeej

Beeeej, Esq.

"Cornell isn't an organization.  It's a loose affiliation of independent fiefdoms united by a common hockey team."
   - Steve Worona

ugarte

From the article posted on the fish tossing thread:

[q]As for rumors circulating around the East Hill that Harvard might be searching for a neutral site for future Cornell games, they are false, according to Nighman and Crimson head coach Mark Mazzoleni.

"It's not a Harvard rumor," Mazzoleni said, asserting that it came from Ithaca. "It's an absolutely ridiculous rumor. It wouldn't show a lot of courage on our part. It's erroneous. It's just a way to add fuel to the fire."[/q]


JohnnieAg99

Do you realize that we are 4-10-3 vs. Havard(sucks) AT LYNAH:-(  since 1984-5????   ::twitch::  ::twitch::  ::twitch::

jeh25

Take out the National Championship caliber Harvard years through 1990ish and what is the record?

Cornell '98 '00; Yale 01-03; UConn 03-07; Brown 07-09; Penn State faculty 09-
Work is no longer an excuse to live near an ECACHL team... :(

rhovorka

That's very odd, because I count us being 7-2-2 at Lynah since "The Reawakening" on Nov. 11, 1995.  You obviously aren't counting the home playoff games in your total.  4-2-1 if you count home regular season games only.

However, you have done a fine job at uncovering a good source of hate.  I remember other members of the Class of '99 coming into their final Harvard Game as undergrads with a 9-0-1 record vs. Crimson.  They got a little too cocky with their "what's the big deal about beating Harvard?" attitude.  They lost that last game, and will eat crow the rest of their lives, if I have anything to say about it.  :-P

Much like the Clarkson Class of '96 who had one more game to become the first class (perhaps ever) to go undefeated vs. SLU.  They lost.

Anyway, the history through 1999-2000: http://www.hockey.cornell.edu/news/History/Team/Harvard.html
Rich H '96

Erica



Much like the Clarkson Class of '96 who had one more game to become the first class (perhaps ever) to go undefeated vs. SLU.  They lost.

And, might I say, much like the current crop of Dartmouth seniors...

BTW, if  they're the first class to go undefeated against SLU, aren't they also the first class ever? (Just trying to figure out why the parentheses are there.)

rhovorka

Erica wrote:
[Q]BTW, if they're the first class to go undefeated against SLU, aren't they also the first class ever? (Just trying to figure out why the parentheses are there.)[/Q]

The parentheses are there because it's an uncertain aside in my own thought process.  I was originally going to say something like "the first class in many years" or "X decades," but then had the "maybe it's the first ever, but I don't know" thought and left that in as a parenthetical and omitted the other stuff.  I assumed that one of our Clarkson friends might chime in with an agreement or correction.  So geez...lighten up on the literal deconstruction of my grammar.  :-)
Rich H '96

jtwcornell91

For that matter, the ten-year regular-season winless streak was part of the reason that the hatred of Harvard was at such a high level when Schafer took over in 1995.