All Ivy Teams Announced

Started by Dart~Ben, March 03, 2004, 02:31:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

Dart~Ben

First Team
Forward: Matt Moulson, Cornell, So. (Mississauga, Ont.)*
Forward: Ryan Vesce, Cornell, Sr. (Lloyd Harbor, N.Y.)
Forward: Lee Stempniak, Dartmouth, Jr. (West Seneca, N.Y.)
Defense: Scott Ford, Brown, Sr. (Fort St. John, B.C.)
Defense: Grant Lewis, Dartmouth, Fr. (Upper St. Clair, Pa.)
Goalie: Yann Danis, Brown, Sr. (St. Jerome, Que.)*

Second Team
Forward: Brent Robinson, Brown, Sr. (Pointe Claire, Que.)
Forward: Les Haggett, Brown, Jr. (Norwood, N.Y.)
Forward: Hugh Jessiman, Dartmouth, So. (Darien, Conn.)
Defense: Charlie Cook, Cornell, Jr. (Port Huron, Mich.)
Defense: Noah Welch, Harvard, Jr. (Brighton, Mass.)
Goalie: David McKee, Cornell, Fr. (Irving, Texas)

Honorable Mention
Tim Pettit, Harvard (Sr., F, Seattle, Wash.); Tom Cavanagh, Harvard (Jr., F, Warwick, R.I.); Vince Macri, Brown (Sr., D, Durham, N.H.); Matt Maglione, Princeton (Sr., D, Fayetteville, N.Y.); Jeff Dwyer, Yale (Sr., D, New Canaan, Conn.)

Player of the Year
Yann Danis, Brown (Sr., G, St. Jerome, Que.)

Rookie of the Year
Brian Ihnacak, Brown (F, Toronto, Ont.)

* = unanimous selection

Ben Flickinger
Omaha, NE
Dartmouth College

Dart~Ben

Quick question regarding the logic involved here...how does Ihnacak get RoY, but not get placed on either All-Ivy team? Or vice versa, how do Lewis and McKee make it onto the All-Ivy teams, but not get RoY?

Ben Flickinger
Omaha, NE
Dartmouth College

cornelldavy

I guess the powers that be consider Ihnacak, who is the 9th-best forward in the Ivies at best, to still be better than the second-best defenseman or second-best goalie.

CowbellGuy

A better question might be how in God's name does Jeremy Downs not even get an honorable mention?

"[Hugh] Jessiman turned out to be a huge specimen of something alright." --Puck Daddy

Ben Rocky Harris 04

What a load.  McKee unquestionably is the rookie of the year: for several weekends this year he was all that stood between Cornell and a 6 or 8th place ECAC finish.

Also....
'unanimous' selection for Danis ???

Hillel J. Hoffmann \'85

The geography of this list is fascinating.

The decline of Ontario as a source of the best D-I hockey talent continues to be apparent. Canadians of all stripes represent only 5 of the 18 players on the list. (Shoot, even two-thirds of the Cornellians on the All-Ivy team are American.) And who woulda thunk that the good ol' Mid Atlantic states would be so heavily represented. New York and Pennsylvania contributed five times as many players as the traditional US D-I feeder states, Massachusetts and Minnesota -- and three of those Mid Atlantic guys are on the first team. I remember the days when every single player on the All-Ivy and All-ECAC teams were from Ontario or Massachusetts.


Chris 02

[q]What a load. McKee unquestionably is the rookie of the year: for several weekends this year he was all that stood between Cornell and a 6 or 8th place ECAC finish[/q]

These are just the Ivy Teams and don't reflect what the players did in non-Ivy play.  If you look at the stats of Danis in Ivy games http://www.collegehockeystats.com/0304/confstats/ivym

he's considerably better than McKee

[q]A better question might be how in God's name does Jeremy Downs not even get an honorable mention?[/q]

As for this one, I think that the powers-that-be just looked at the defensemen scoring stats.  Downs didn't score or assist on goals in Ivy games.  I guess that's why the ECAC has awards such as the "defensive defensemen" or "defensive forward" things.


jtwcornell91

Didn't realize collegehockeystats.com had a separate Ivy section.  That's nice.  (Maybe they should add a Big Ten category as well ;-))


Josh '99

QuoteChris '02 wrote:
As for this one, I think that the powers-that-be just looked at the defensemen scoring stats.  Downs didn't score or assist on goals in Ivy games.  I guess that's why the ECAC has awards such as the "defensive defensemen" or "defensive forward" things.
If that's the case, I have a hard time seeing how Welch (4 points) got in on anything but reputation, when 8 defensemen outscored him.
"They do all kind of just blend together into one giant dildo."
-Ben Rocky 04

Will

QuoteJosh Herman '99 wrote:

If that's the case, I have a hard time seeing how Welch (4 points) got in on anything but reputation, when 8 defensemen outscored him.

To rectify this, we should start www.jeremydowns.com, and garner Hobey Baker hopeful attention to this guy who we know is a great player.

Oh, wait, we're not Brown. ::rolleyes::

Is next year here yet?

Ben Rocky Harris 04

Yes, you're right.  Danis has a better Ivy GAA, which I did not know.
But Yann is the experienced senior.  McKee, a freshman, tied him once, and to me is a much more impressive goaltender considering how he was thrown into the deep end at the beginning of the season, and preformed admirably.

I guess I am just a little biased towards Cornell skaters......

calgARI \'07

At all levels, these things tend to totally favor only defensemen with good offensive numbers.  The Norris trophy for best defenseman in the NHL pretty much always (in the last 25 years) goes to a  blueliner in the top 10 (usually top 5) in defense scoring.  In college, how can anyone possibly make these picks for IVY or ECAC or All American or Hobey when 90% of the voters have only seen a couple candidates play regularly?  It's almost all based totally on numbers.  Defensive defenseman rarely get recognized.  I do like the defensive defenseman of the year award that the ECAC gives out.

calgARI \'07

Purely based on reputation.  Murray was obviously outstanding last year, but to everyone that voted, he was a no-brainer for All American, defensman of the year, etc.  And this may sound ridiculous to some, but LeNeveu was not the MVP of the ECAC last year and certainly not the MVP in the playoffs, but based on his spectacular numbers, he got it without question.  
I wanna know how anyone can vote on these awards considering the people that vote barely see most of these players play.  It has no merit.  Purely based on reputation and stats.

Keith K \'93

Sure, the voters don't see the players play much.  but no one does.  So it's either uninformed voting or no voting.  At least in the case of All-Ivy selections the coaches have seen each player play 20% of his teams games.

calgARI \'07

I, like everyone else, wants something in the way of post season awards, so we'll take the uninformed voting, but it is definitely uninformed.
You said the coaches vote for IVY selections.  Who votes for ECAC selections?  All Americans?  I know media votes for the Hobey (which is ridiculous).