HARVARD SUCKS

[Trotsky]

A simple reiteration prior to the game tonight.  Harvard sucks.

[Roy 82]

Anyone else having trouble logging on to Redcast?

This, well uh, sucks.

[MattShaf]

1-1 start lynah east living up to name. Good game so far a few to many turnovers. Looking forward to stronger 2nd.

[Trotsky]

With the win, Cornell has 5 straight wins against Harvard, their longest streak since 6 straight during the Silver Age of '02-04.  Schafer is 21-9-1 in regular season games against them: 10-4-1 in Fish N Fowl and 11-5-0 at Lynah East.

When Mike became coach Cornell was 41-45-5 all-time vs Harvard and had just gone 2-20-3 from the infamous 11-3 Lynah loss to the end of the McCutcheon era.  Since then Cornell is 30-12-2.

Thank you, Schafer.

[KeithK]

With the win, Cornell has 5 straight wins against Harvard, their longest streak since 6 straight during the Silver Age of '02-04.  Schafer is 21-9-1 in regular season games against them: 10-4-1 in Fish N Fowl and 11-5-0 at Lynah East.

When Mike became coach Cornell was 41-45-5 all-time vs Harvard and had just gone 2-20-3 from the infamous 11-3 Lynah loss to the end of the McCutcheon era.  Since then Cornell is 30-12-2.

Thank you, Schafer.

...and Tomassoni and Mazzolini and Donato.  But mostly Schafer. Thank you Schafer.

[Jim Hyla]

With the win, Cornell has 5 straight wins against Harvard, their longest streak since 6 straight during the Silver Age of '02-04.  Schafer is 21-9-1 in regular season games against them: 10-4-1 in Fish N Fowl and 11-5-0 at Lynah East.

When Mike became coach Cornell was 41-45-5 all-time vs Harvard and had just gone 2-20-3 from the infamous 11-3 Lynah loss to the end of the McCutcheon era.  Since then Cornell is 30-12-2.

Thank you, Schafer.

...and Tomassoni and Mazzolini and Donato.  But mostly Schafer. Thank you Schafer.

Yeah, they have had a string of them, haven't they.

[Robb]

With the win, Cornell has 5 straight wins against Harvard, their longest streak since 6 straight during the Silver Age of '02-04.  Schafer is 21-9-1 in regular season games against them: 10-4-1 in Fish N Fowl and 11-5-0 at Lynah East.

When Mike became coach Cornell was 41-45-5 all-time vs Harvard and had just gone 2-20-3 from the infamous 11-3 Lynah loss to the end of the McCutcheon era.  Since then Cornell is 30-12-2.

Thank you, Schafer.

...and Tomassoni and Mazzolini and Donato.  But mostly Schafer. Thank you Schafer.

Yeah, they have had a string of them, haven't they.

During which, Harvard won 4 ECAC championships.  There are 10 other ECAC teams that dream of such a string...

[BigRedNH]

Tomassoni - 140-115-26 - ECAC Regular Season Champs - 91-92, 92-93, 93-94 - ECAC Tournament Champs - 93-94 - Frozen Four 93-94

Mazzolini - 82-72-11 - ECAC Tournament Champs 01-02, 03-04

Donato - 95-102-20 - ECAC Tournament Champs 05-06

In Donato's first two years with Mazzolini's players he went 21-10-3 and 21-12-2 with two NCAA appearances and an ECAC Tournament Championship.  Since then he has went 53-83-15 not counting this year' 4-16-0 mark.  Perhaps Tomassoni was not so bad after all?

[KeithK]

Don't bother me with facts and details!  Those three men coached for Harvard so clearly they sucked.  Case closed!

[Towerroad]

Don't bother me with facts and details!  Those three men coached for Harvard so clearly they sucked.  Case closed!

Amen!

[Josh '99]

Tomassoni - 140-115-26 - ECAC Regular Season Champs - 91-92, 92-93, 93-94 - ECAC Tournament Champs - 93-94 - Frozen Four 93-94

Mazzolini - 82-72-11 - ECAC Tournament Champs 01-02, 03-04

Donato - 95-102-20 - ECAC Tournament Champs 05-06

In Donato's first two years with Mazzolini's players he went 21-10-3 and 21-12-2 with two NCAA appearances and an ECAC Tournament Championship.  Since then he has went 53-83-15 not counting this year' 4-16-0 mark.  Perhaps Tomassoni was not so bad after all?

I guess it depends on whether you're of the Clarkson school of thought (regular season is more important) or the Cornell school of thought (postseason is more important).  If you're a postseason believer, I think you would say that RT underachieved after inheriting a team just one year removed from winning a national championship, with players like Ted Donato and Ted Drury, and then basically ran it into the ground after 1994.  Mazz, on the other hand, had to compete with the great Cornell teams of the early '00s and still managed a couple of conference championships.  And Donato is just in over his head, and pretty much has been all along.

The one thing they all have in common is that they're easy to dislike.

[BigRedNH]

Easy to dislike is an understatement...they are all that is bad and evil in this world, certainly in New England at the very least.

[RichH]

Tomassoni - 140-115-26 - ECAC Regular Season Champs - 91-92, 92-93, 93-94 - ECAC Tournament Champs - 93-94 - Frozen Four 93-94

Mazzolini - 82-72-11 - ECAC Tournament Champs 01-02, 03-04

Donato - 95-102-20 - ECAC Tournament Champs 05-06

In Donato's first two years with Mazzolini's players he went 21-10-3 and 21-12-2 with two NCAA appearances and an ECAC Tournament Championship.  Since then he has went 53-83-15 not counting this year' 4-16-0 mark.  Perhaps Tomassoni was not so bad after all?

I guess it depends on whether you're of the Clarkson school of thought (regular season is more important) or the Cornell school of thought (postseason is more important).  If you're a postseason believer, I think you would say that RT underachieved after inheriting a team just one year removed from winning a national championship, with players like Ted Donato and Ted Drury, and then basically ran it into the ground after 1994.  Mazz, on the other hand, had to compete with the great Cornell teams of the early '00s and still managed a couple of conference championships.  And Donato is just in over his head, and pretty much has been all along.

The one thing they all have in common is that they're easy to dislike.

I dunno...I've been very pleased with Teddy Rogaine's performance to date, as well as giving us a nickname like "Teddy Rogaine." I hope he sticks around for many, many years.

[Josh '99]

Tomassoni - 140-115-26 - ECAC Regular Season Champs - 91-92, 92-93, 93-94 - ECAC Tournament Champs - 93-94 - Frozen Four 93-94

Mazzolini - 82-72-11 - ECAC Tournament Champs 01-02, 03-04

Donato - 95-102-20 - ECAC Tournament Champs 05-06

In Donato's first two years with Mazzolini's players he went 21-10-3 and 21-12-2 with two NCAA appearances and an ECAC Tournament Championship.  Since then he has went 53-83-15 not counting this year' 4-16-0 mark.  Perhaps Tomassoni was not so bad after all?

I guess it depends on whether you're of the Clarkson school of thought (regular season is more important) or the Cornell school of thought (postseason is more important).  If you're a postseason believer, I think you would say that RT underachieved after inheriting a team just one year removed from winning a national championship, with players like Ted Donato and Ted Drury, and then basically ran it into the ground after 1994.  Mazz, on the other hand, had to compete with the great Cornell teams of the early '00s and still managed a couple of conference championships.  And Donato is just in over his head, and pretty much has been all along.

The one thing they all have in common is that they're easy to dislike.

I dunno...I've been very pleased with Teddy Rogaine's performance to date, as well as giving us a nickname like "Teddy Rogaine." I hope he sticks around for many, many years.

I didn't say I was upset that Teddy Rogaine is in over his (shiny bald) head.  :-D

[Killer]

Harvard tearing up the ice in the Beanpot.  Down 4-0 to Northeastern with about 14:00 left in the 3rd.