Adam's assessment of freshmen

Started by Robb \'94, October 28, 2003, 01:01:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

DeltaOne81

Well, that's what I meant when I said that it didn't take in account the effect of teams being added. I didn't realize it also effects the Marlins calculation.

Believe me, the Marlins are about my second to last choice to win the series next year, they've won plenty recently. If they won next year again, I'd probably even pick the Yanks over them after that (then Yanks would be second to last).

I'm logical about this... I don't like teams that win a lot. I didn't like the Bulls or the 49ers or the Cowboys, I hate the Lakers. If I was old enough I'm sure I would have hated the Islanders in the early 80s. I hated the Red Wings when they won twice.

Teams that win too much bug me. The Yanks just happened to be the worst offender over the longest period of time.

Keith K \'93

[Q]Teams that win too much bug me. [/Q]
I can understand that.  I couldn't stand the A's in the late '80s when they were the class of the AL.  Insofar as I care about the NBA the Bulls pissed me off in the '90s.  But obviously it's different when it's your team doing the winning.  So I respect people who hate the Yankees.  Actually, it warms my heart, because nobody bothered to hate the Yankees ten years ago (well, not many outside of New England :-) ).

BTW - you are right Whelan.  I try to forget about '94...

Jim Hyla

[Q]Teams that win too much bug me. [/Q]I wasn't going to respond to this Yankee bashing, buuuut... doesn't anyone see the similarity between those that bash the Yankees and those that do it against us? After all if you look at ECAC Championships we certainly have won the highest %, and maybe about the same as the Yankees have.

So if we hate those that hate us just for winning, should we turn around and do the same to another team? It sure would be calmer if we could just be for someone and not have to hate someone else.

"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

Greg Berge

D'backs are 10% as well: 1/10.

I hate expansion teams.  I rooted against the Marlins (and, naturally, lost).

When the Yankees win it's the same as a year without a Series -- it doesn't suck, like a Marlins win, but it isn't anything worth celebrating, either.  The odds are always stacked in favor of the House -- when the wheel comes up 0 or 00, everybody loses and you just spin again.  When the Yankees win, the guy who runs the game cleans the table.  Not hateful -- just grimly inevitable.



Post Edited (10-28-03 21:08)

DeltaOne81

Ah, excellent, I can combine my responses to Keith and Jim, cause it's pretty much one topic.

Rule #1 is 'root for your team', so I don't blame Yankee fans for being Yankee fans (I do blame half of them for acting like jackoffs when they win, however). I also don't like it when some Yankees fans get pissed off at it. All teams that do well get negative feelings towards them - especially multiplied when they spend 60% more than the nearest competitor. I dunno if it should 'warm your heart', Keith ;-)... but it's certainly a reaction to positive events on your end .

On the same note, I certainly do see the similarity to people who don't like us. And I don't blame them. Of course I'm gonna root for my own team, but if we were to win a few championships in a row, I would certainly understand the people who think it's boring for everyone else and/or annoying. I mean, who here really thinks the ECAC is best served with us blowing away the competition every year in the regular season?

Doesn't mean I still wouldn't say... Let's Go Red! ;-)

P.S. Oh, one more thing...
[Q]It sure would be calmer if we could just be for someone and not have to hate someone else.[/Q]
This is a Cornell fan saying this?? Yeah, cause I can't think of anyone we hate :-P. And isn't this essentially the same reason that we hate Hahvahd? Both academically and sports-wise, they're often at or near the top, and you wanna knock the top down. Nothing wrong with it, but Yanks fans shouldn't think they're singled out any more than their overall success deserves. The attitude of "it's not fair that people hate us" is just not reasonable... and kinda snobbish to imply that everyone's gotta love the dear old Yanks.



Post Edited (10-28-03 21:17)

Jim Hyla

[Q]This is a Cornell fan saying this??[/Q]Yeah, it is a Cornell fan that is saying this! And you know what, I don't hate Harvard. Yeah, I always want to beat them, and yeah, if I do go to some of their package games, I'll root against them. But hate, well that is not an emotion that I have found to give me much satisfaction over the years.

In fact, some of my most satisfying moments have been when I could watch some of those Cornell haters when we won, yet again. Certain Vermont fans in the mid 90's come to mind.

So, you can certainly hate if you want to, but don't imply that someone who has seen countless more games than you have, needs to hate to be a Cornell fan.

"Cornell Fans Made the Timbers Tremble", Boston Globe, March/1970
Cornell lawyers stopped the candy throwing. Jan/2005

DeltaOne81

[Q]but don't imply that someone who has seen countless more games than you have, needs to hate to be a Cornell fan.[/Q]
Nah, never meant to imply it, Jim. No disrespect meant. I can certainly see that it's not a prerequisite, but it is very common, so my suprise is understandable I'd hope :-). Sure, no one needs to hate, but it's often natural and sometimes it's fun, and when it's both, I'm not gonna stop. I'd rather have a rooting interest in a game than sit there not caring. It means more to me.

So anyway, I hope I showed why I don't like the Yankees, why it's common, and how it's not just the Yankees that are affected by the concept. It's not just "you suck, die", it's "I'm getting tired of this and I'd like to see a little more long term variety (oh, btw, you suck, die ;-) )".

Back to your regularly scheduled program... how 'bout those freshman? :-D



Post Edited (10-28-03 21:38)

Keith K \'93

Arizona is actually 1/6 (started in '98) or 16.7%.

The short list:
Yankees     26.3%
Marlins     20%
Arizona     16.7%
Athletics   9.1%
Cardinals   9.1%
Blue Jays   7.7%
Dodgers     6.1%
Reds, Red Sox, Giants, Pirates all tied at 5.1%

If we consider teams separately when in different cities (e.g. the Giants in NY and SF are separate), which is what the official records do, then Oakland jumps to 11.4% and LA is up to 11.1%.

tml5

Greg wrote:

[Q] I hate expansion teams. [/Q]

This from a Mets fan?  :-P

Sorry Greg, couldn't resist. :-}

Robb \'94

Hey, let's not forget Cornell men's hockey:  10/42 = 23.8%, versus an "expected" value of 2.89 championships over that run (if all teams had an equal chance of winning every year), for a "championship ratio" of 3.46 times as many as we should have won.  I don't know how that compares to the Yankees (not sure how many baseball teams there were each season), but it's pretty impressive!